Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 554–563 | Cite as

Failure of Titanium Condenser Tubes After 24 Years Power Plant Service

  • Melanie Montgomery
  • Allan Enemark
  • Anders Hangaard
Case History---Peer-Reviewed
  • 265 Downloads

Abstract

The titanium condenser has been in operation for 24 years at Amager unit 3 power plant. In February 2012, the plant was contaminated by seawater due to a failed condenser tube and some tubes were plugged. A month later, the plant tripped again. Small leaks were found again and finally approx. 200 tubes were plugged before the condenser was in service again. A series of inspections, NDT, and destructive examinations were conducted to try and understand the cause of failure in the tubes within the condenser. After such investigations, degradation mechanisms such as inner fouling, steam impingement, and fretting/erosion around the supports could be discounted. Ductile cracks were found in the tube within the tubesheet. From circumstantial evidence, it was concluded that failure was caused by a semi-filled condenser which led to a mismatch in expansion coefficients of filled tubes and unfilled tubes during a plant trip. In addition, small amounts of titanium hydride were revealed to be present in the tubes within the tubesheet indicating that the carbon steel tubesheet was corroding due to ingress of salt water. Although this was not the reason for the failure, it indicated the need for repair of the epoxy coating in the waterbox.

Keywords

Titanium condenser Failure Power plant trip 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank HOFOR for constructive discussions and allowing the publication of this paper. Thanks also go to DTU-Mekanik for help with metallurgical analysis and discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Al-Meshari, M. Diab, S. Al-Enazi, Investigation: failure of a surface condenser titanium tube. Hydrocarbon Process. 90(4), 55–58 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.G. Daniels, Taming condenser tube leaks part I and II, www.powermag.com Sep/Oct 2010
  3. 3.
    O. Andersen, K. Sjølstad, Titanium tube failures in Helifin Heat Exchangers. Presented at Stainless Steel World 2009—Reproduced from Statoils website. http://www.kcicms.com/pdf/factfiles/titanium/ssw09ce_titanium_statoil.pdf?resourceId=130. Accessed 3 July 2014
  4. 4.
    D. Fan, W.C. Fort, R. Horvath, Experience with Titanium Heat Exchangers in Refinery Services, NACE Proceedings 2000, Paper 00691, 2000Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z.G. Yang, Y. Gong, J.Z. Yuan, Failure analysis of leakage on titanium tubes within heat exchangers in a nuclear power plant. Part I: electrochemical corrosion. Mater. Corros. 63, 7–17 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Gong, Z.G. Yang, J.Z. Yuan, Failure analysis of leakage on titanium tubes within heat exchangers in a nuclear power plant. Part II: mechanical degradation. Mater. Corros. 63, 18–28 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.H. Hsu, Fatigue cracking of titanium tubes in an industrial heat exchanger. J. Mater. Eng. 10, 57–60 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.H. Hsu, The failure of titanium clad tube sheet in heat exchanger by fatigue cracking and corrosion. Proceedings Industrial Heat Exchanger Technology, (Pittsburg, PA 6–8 Nov, Ed ASM 1985) pp. 281–284Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Q.L. Ma, H. Xu, Z.W. Wang, F. Hou, L.Y. Xu, Failure analysis and critical manufacturing technology research on titanium condensers. Eng. Fail. Anal. 12, 432–439 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Onishi, M. Yano, T. Hoshika, T. Haruna, Results of an Investigation into the localised hydrogen embrittlement of titanium heat exchanger tubes in a wastewater environment. Proceedings of NACE Corrosion Conference 2007, Paper 07200, 2007Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.M. Shalaby, H. Al-Mazeedi, H. Gopal, N. Tanoli, Failure of titanium condenser tube. Eng. Fail. Anal. 18, 1990–1997 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.J. Schumerth, T. Demers, Hydrogen Embrittlement in Titanium and Superferritic Stainless Steel Steam Surface Condensing Tube. Proceedings NACE Corrosion 2013, Paper 2078Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W.H. Hartt, L. Liu, Fatigue properties of hydrided titanium condenser tubes. Corrosion 48, 172–176 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.W. Schutz, Corrosion of Titanium and Titanium Alloys Corrosion: Materials, vol 13B (ASM Handbook, ASM International, 2005), pp. 252–299Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C.F. Briant, Z.F. Wang, N. Chollocoop, Hydrogen embrittlement of commercial purity titanium. Corros. Sci. 44, 1875–1888 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Thomsen, Handling a serious seawater contamination of the water-steam circuit of a once-through boiler at amagerværket power plant. Power Plant Chem. 15(3), 168–182 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Montgomery
    • 1
  • Allan Enemark
    • 2
  • Anders Hangaard
    • 3
  1. 1.DTU Mekanik/COWI A/SKongens LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.COWI A/SVejleDenmark
  3. 3.HOFORKøbenhavnDenmark

Personalised recommendations