Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 549–549 | Cite as

Erratum to: Fracture Surface Analysis of 3D-Printed Tensile Specimens of Novel ABS-Based Materials

  • Angel R. Torrado Perez
  • David A. Roberson
  • Ryan B. Wicker
Erratum

Erratum to: J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2014) 14:343–353 DOI 10.1007/s11668-014-9803-9

The correct address for Materials Science, University of Texas at El Paso is 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.

As specified in the original article, the data for UTS, elongation to break and Young’s modulus for the ABS loaded with TiO2, jute fiber and TP elastomer were based on three specimens instead of five specimens. Tables 3 and 4 are updated with the correct data. The data for ABS remains the same.
Table 3

Values of UTS and UFS for XYZ specimens

Material

UTS

Stress, MPa @Strain, %

UFS

Stress, MPa @Strain, %

Young’s modulus, MPa

Average

St. Dev.

ABS

28.4 @ 2.2

18.4 @ 4.5

1530

114

ABS 5% jute

24.2 @ 2.5

21.8 @ 4.8

1435

77

ABS 5% TiO2

32.7 @ 2.1

17.9 @ 4.0

1954

331

ABS 5% TP rubber

24.1 @ 2.2

18.9 @ 3.6

1535

278

Table 4

Values of UTS and UFS for vertical specimens

Material

UTS/UFS

Stress, MPa Strain (%)

Young’s modulus, MPa

Average

St. Dev.

ABS

14.1 @ 1.5

1190

166

ABS 5% jute

9.7 @ 1.7

913

158

ABS 5% TiO2

18.1 @ 1.8

1656

285

ABS 5% TP rubber

12.6 @ 1.8

1126

102

Copyright information

© ASM International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angel R. Torrado Perez
    • 1
    • 2
  • David A. Roberson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ryan B. Wicker
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.W.M. Keck Center for 3D InnovationThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations