Skip to main content
Log in

Unification of Common Cause Failures’ Parametric Models Using a Generic Markovian Model

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to provide a unified Markov model which could implement any parametric models devoted to the treatment of common cause failures (CCFs), namely: beta factor, multiple greek letter, alpha factor, multiple beta factor, and binomial failure rate. The choice of the Markovian representation is motivated by the fact that classical reliability approaches (e.g., Fault trees) are not able to catch the dynamic aspect induced by CCF events. The proposed Markovian model is also capable of dealing with any M-out-of-N configuration. It is illustrated on the basis of a system made up of four identical components (N = 4) in order to quantitatively examine the differences between the first four mentioned parametric models. For that purpose, the considered performance indicators are the average unavailability (U avg) and the average unconditional failure intensity (i.e., failure frequency) (w avg).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEC61508, Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems (International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 2009)

  2. NUREG/CR-4780, Procedures for Treating Common Cause Failures in Safety and Reliability Studies. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (Electric Power Research Institute, Washington DC, 1988)

  3. NUREG/CR-6819, Common-Cause Failure Event Insights (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 2003)

  4. L. Mary Ann, R. Marvin, Common cause failures in safety instrumented systems on oil and gas installations: implementing defense measures through function testing. Prev. Process Ind. 20, 218–229 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. NEA/ CSNI/ R (92) 18, State of the Art of Level-1 PSA Methodology. Nuclear Energy Agency (1993)

  6. P. Hokstad, Common Cause and Dependent Failure Modeling. New Trends in System Reliability Evaluation (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, New York, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.N. Fleming, A. Mosleh, Classification and Analysis of Reactor Operating Experience Involving Dependent Events (Electric Power Research Institute, 1985)

  8. G.W. Parry, Incompleteness in Data Bases: Impact on Parameter Estimation Uncertainty (Springer, New York, 1987)

  9. M.G.K. Evans, G.W. Parry, J. Wreathall, On the treatment of common-cause failures in system analysis. Reliab. Eng. 9(2), 107–115 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K.N. Fleming, A Reliability Model for Common Mode Failure in Redundant Safety Systems. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Pittsburgh Conference on Modeling and Simulation. General Atomic Report GA-A13284 (1975)

  11. K.N. Fleming, A.M. Kalinowski, An Extension of the Beta Factor Method to Systems with High Levels of Redundancy (Pickard, Lowe and Garrick, Washington, DC, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Mosleh, N.O. Siu, A multi-parameter, event-based common- cause failure model. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology. (Lausanne, 1987)

  13. NUREG/CR-2098, Common Cause Fault Rates for Pumps. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1983)

  14. NUREG/CR-4780 Vol. 2, Procedures for Treating Common Cause Failures in Safety and Reliability Studies (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Electric Power Research Institute, Washington DC, 1989)

  15. P. Hokstad, K. Corneliussen, Reliability Prediction Method for Safety Instrumented Systems PDS Method Handbook (SINTEF Industrial Management Safety and Reliability, Trondheim, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Hokstad, K. Corneliussen, Loss of safety assessment and the IEC 61508 standard. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 83, 111–120 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Per, M. Alexandre, A.P. Tomis, Estimation of common cause factors from systems with different numbers of channels. IEEE Tans. Relaib. 55(1), 18–25 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.G. Han, W.H. Yoo, S.H. Chang, The trinomial failure rate model for treating common. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 25, 131–146 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Athena, B. Tim, W. Lesley, An influence diagram extension of the unified partial method for common cause failures. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 4(1), 111–128 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Cantarella, Treatement of Multiple Related Failures by Markov Method. Advanced Seminar on Common Cause Failure Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Ispra, 1989), pp. 145–157

  21. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2012), CCF Parameter Estimations (2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mourad Chebila.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chebila, M., Innal, F. Unification of Common Cause Failures’ Parametric Models Using a Generic Markovian Model. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 14, 426–434 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9828-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9828-0

Keywords

Navigation