Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 220–235 | Cite as

Metallurgical Investigation into the Incidence of Delayed Catastrophic Cracking in Low Nickel Austenitic Stainless Steel Coils

Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 244 Downloads

Abstract

An incidence of delayed catastrophic cracking in commercially processed low nickel austenitic stainless steel coils during unwinding of the material at a customer’s end has been investigated. The fracture surfaces of failed steel coil samples revealed a brittle intercrystalline mode of fracture with typical manifestations of clear grain facets. Optical and scanning electron microscopy of polished, unetched steel specimens exposed a preponderance of branched as well as discrete stepwise microcracks, commonly observed in hydrogen-induced delayed failures. The specimens, electrolytically etched in 10% oxalic acid, were found to exhibit pronounced intergranular cracking, stepwise microcracking, grain dropping, and intergranular ditching in the annealed austenite microstructure of low nickel stainless steel. Investigations also revealed unusual levels of residual hydrogen to the extent of 11 ppm in steel specimens and a marked loss of tensile ductility was also noticeable in the defective steel with elongations barely approaching 8% in comparison to an overall elongation of 50% at the time of its dispatch to the customer. Based on the delayed nature of cracking, which transpired at customer’s premises after several days/months of dispatch, and the fact that the failure of the coils occurred at the time of uncoiling, when the operating stresses are well below the yield point of the material, it is surmised that the failure is attributable to hydrogen-induced damage. This article also takes a critical look at the possible sources of hydrogen pickup during steel making and elucidates remedial measures for control of hydrogen content in steels.

Keywords

Austenitic stainless steel Delayed cracking Hydrogen-induced damage Steel making Hydrogen pickup 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the help rendered by Mr. John Guria, Senior Technician (RDCIS, SAIL, Ranchi, India) for optical and electron microscopy, which was indispensable in the present investigation. The support and encouragement extended by the management of RDCIS, SAIL, Ranchi, India is also thankfully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    J.A. Zelinski, C. San Marchi, Technical reference on hydrogen compatibility of materials, High-alloy ferritic steels: duplex stainless steels (code 1600), Sandia National Laboratories Report, Sep 2008, pp. 1600–1601Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Yagodzinskyy, O. Todoshchenko, S. Papula, H. Hänninen, Steel Res. Int. 82(1), 20 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.R. Louthan, G.R. Caskey, J.A. Donovan, D.E. Rawl, Mater. Sci. Eng. 10, 357–368 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B.C. Odegard, J.A. Brooks, A.J. West, The effect of hydrogen on mechanical behavior of nitrogen-strengthened stainless steel, in Proceedings of International Conference on Effect of Hydrogen on Behavior of Materials, 1975, ed. by A.W. Thompson, and I.M. Bernstein (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Moran, WY, 1976), pp. 116–125Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hydrogen in Steels. From www.keytometals.com
  6. 6.
    M.I. Luppo, A. Hazarabedian, J. Ovejero-Garcia, Corros. Sci. 41, 87–103 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Kim, Y. Kim, D. Kim, S. Kim, W. Nam, H. Choe, Mater. Trans. 52(3), 507–513 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Sofronis, I.M. Robertson, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Hydrogen in Matter, ed. by G.R. Myneni, B. Hjörvarsson (Uppsala, 2005), pp. 64–70Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.K. Dayal, N. Parvathavarthini, Sādhanā 28(3–4), 431–451 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.J. McMahon Jr, Eng. Fract. Mech. 68, 773–788 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.B. Whiteman, A.R. Troiano, Phys. Stat. Sol. 7, K109 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E.R. Slaughter, J. Met., 430–431 (1956, April)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K.N. Jha, M.K. Sardar, N.N. Jha, S. Chakraborty, Scand. J. Metall. 32, 296–300 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Srikanth
    • 1
  • P. Saravanan
    • 1
  • S. Sisodia
    • 2
  • K. Ravi
    • 1
  1. 1.R&D Centre for Iron and SteelSteel Authority of India LimitedRanchiIndia
  2. 2.Salem Steel PlantSteel Authority of India LimitedSalemIndia

Personalised recommendations