Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 693–699 | Cite as

A Microstructural and Fractographic Study on the Failure of a Drive Shaft

  • Cássio Barbosa
  • Jôneo Lopes do Nascimento
  • Iêda Maria Vieira Caminha
  • Ibrahim de Cerqueira Abud
  • Sheyla Santana de Carvalho
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

The automotive industry is one of the most dynamic and competitive segments of the international economy and it has invested considerable resources into the research and development of new components and the improvement of existent pieces. Nonetheless, failures continue to occur, often because of defects in a component. Failure analysis uses several techniques to investigate causes of the defect which led to the failure of a component, equipment, or structure. Usually, these causes are related to the use of inadequate materials, the presence of defects which appear during fabrication or design errors, or improper assembly, maintenance and use. Knowledge about these causes and the correction of such anomalies allow the improvement of the performance of components regarding both efficiency and safety. In this study, the results of the failure analysis of the drive bar of a police car are presented and light optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results are used to show that the presence of an already existent defect and an unfavorable microstructure led to the occurrence of brittle fracture which caused the premature and catastrophic failure of this component.

Keywords

Failure analysis Steels Fracture Microscopy Automotive components 

References

  1. 1.
    McEvily, A.J.: Metal Failures: Mechanisms, Analysis, Prevention, pp. 303–307. Wiley, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wouters, R., Froyen, L.: Scanning electron microscope fractography in failure analysis of steels. Mater. Charact. 36, 357–364 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Metals Handbook, Failure Analysis and Prevention, 9th edn., vol. 11, pp. 13–65. ASM (American Society for Metals), Metals Park, OH (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASM Handbook, Failure Analysis and Prevention, vol. 11, pp. 560–599. ASM International, Materials Park, OH (2002) (2nd printing: 2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASM Handbook, Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels and High Performance Alloys, vol. 1, p. 176. ASM International, Materials park, OH (1990) (6th printing: 2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pickering, F.B.: Physical Metallurgy and the Design of Steels, pp. 107–108. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London (1978)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.: Bainite in Steels, 2nd edn., pp. 2–4, 189. IOM Communications Ltd. (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ASM Handbook, Metallography and Microstructures, vol. 9, pp. 56–62. Metals Park (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Easterling, K.E.: Introduction to the Physical Metallurgy of Welding, pp. 88–92. Butterworths, Sevenoaks (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Porter, D.A., Easterling, K.E.: Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, pp. 317–322. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shewmon, P.G.: Transformations in Metals, pp. 216–226. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1969)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hashemi, S.H., Mohammadyani, D., Pouranvari, M., Mousavizadeh, S.M.: On the relation of microstructure and impact toughness characteristics of DSAW steel of grade API X70. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 32, 33–40 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gubeljak, N.: Unstable fracture behaviour of weld metal at a high strength low alloy steel. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Autom. Control Robot. 3(13), 715–727 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rak, I., Gliha, V., Koçak, M.: Weldability and toughness assessment of Ti-microalloyed offshore steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 28A, 199–206 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cabalín, L.M., Mateo, M.P., Laserna, J.J.: Large area mapping of non-metallic inclusions in stainless steel by an automated system based on laser ablation. Spectrochim. Acta B 59, 567–575 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perkins, K.M., Bache, M.R.: The influence of inclusions on the fatigue performance of a low pressure turbine blade steel. Int. J. Fatigue 27, 610–616 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maropoulos, S., Ridley, N.: Inclusions and fracture characteristics of HSLA steel forgings. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 384, 64–69 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Atkinson, H.V., Shi, G.: Characterization of inclusions in clean steels: a review including the statistics of extreme methods. Prog. Mater. Sci. 48, 457–520 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, L.: Inclusion and bubble in steel—a review. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 13(3), 1–8 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shi, G., Zhou, S., Ding, P.: Investigation of nonmetallic inclusions in high-speed steels. Mater. Charact. 38, 19–23 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ASM Handbook, Fractography, vol. 12, p. 217. Materials Park (2nd printing, 1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hertzberg, R.W.: Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 2nd edn., pp. 261–263. Wiley, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    ASTM E 140-05 Standard: Standard Hardness Conversion Tables for Metals, Relationship Among Brinell Hardness, Vickers Hardness, Rockwell Hardness, Superficial Hardness, Knoop Hardness and Scleroscope HardnessGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cássio Barbosa
    • 1
  • Jôneo Lopes do Nascimento
    • 1
  • Iêda Maria Vieira Caminha
    • 1
  • Ibrahim de Cerqueira Abud
    • 1
  • Sheyla Santana de Carvalho
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Technology (INT)Rio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations