Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 322–333 | Cite as

Risks of Fire and Explosion Associated With the Increasing Use of Liquefied Petroleum Gas

  • S. M. Tauseef
  • Tasneem Abbasi
  • S. A. Abbasi
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) has been in use as household fuel all over the world for several decades. Until the late 1980s, its use in the developing world was largely confined to the economically well-off strata of the society but it has since spread over a much larger catchment. The increasing use of LPG has enhanced and generalized the risk of a “boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion” (BLEVE). This is evidenced from the reports which appear now and then of a LPG cylinder having exploded in a household, some workshop, or on a bus or a train. In fact some very major tragedies have been triggered by such explosions which also set off fires and cause secondary accidents. This paper describes what BLEVEs are and how can they be controlled. The paper focuses on hazards of BLEVE in large installations which deal with LPG, and other pressure-liquefied gases and discusses the nature, mechanism, and means of control of BLEVEs.

Keywords

Pressure-liquefied gas BLEVE Explosion Superheat Control 

Notes

Acknowledgment

S. M. Tauseef thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for Senior Research Fellowship. Thanks are also due to Dr F. Tamanini of FM Global for putting us in touch with Mr Bill Walls, a pioneer in BLEVE studies.

References

  1. 1.
    CCPS: Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birk, A.M., Cunningham, M.H.: The boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 7, 474–480 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lees, F.P.: Loss Prevention in the Process Industries-Hazard Identification, Assessment, and Control, vol. 1–3. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Risk Assessment in the Chemical Process Industries: Advanced Techniques. Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casal, J., Arnaldos, J., Montiel, H., Planas-Cuchi, E., Vilchez, J.A.: Modelling and understanding BLEVEs. In: Fingas, M. (ed.) Handbook of Hazardous Spills. McGraw Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CCPS: Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions, Flash Fires and BLEVE’s. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peterson, D.F.: BLEVE: facts, risk factors, and fallacies. Fire Eng. 155, 97–103 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walls, W.L.: What is a BLEVE. Fire J. 31, 46–47 (1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walls, W.L.: The BLEVE—part 1. Fire Command. 17, 35–37 (1979)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reid, R.C.: Superheated liquids. Am. Scientist 64, 146–156 (1976)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Venart, J.E.S., Sollows, K.F., Sumathipala, K., Rutledge, G.A., Jian, X.: Boiling Liquid Compressed Bubble Explosions: Experiments/Models, Gas–Liquid Flows, vol. 165, pp. 55–60. ASME, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDevitt, C.A., Chan, C.K., Steward, F.R., Tennankore, K.N.: Initiation step of boiling liquid expanding vapor explosions. J. Hazard. Mater. 25, 169–180 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prugh, R.W.: Quantitative evaluation of “BLEVE” hazards. J. Fire Protect. Eng 3, 9–24 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prugh, R.W.: Quantify BLEVE hazards. Chem. Eng. Prog. 87, 66–72 (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leslie, I.R.M., Birk, A.M.: State of the art review of pressure liquefied gas container failure modes and associated projectile hazards. J. Hazard. Mater. 28, 329–365 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Birk, A.M., Cunningham, M.H.: Liquid temperature stratification and its effect on BLEVEs and their hazards. J. Hazard. Mater. 48, 219–237 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.E.S. Venart, Boiling liquid expanding vapor explosions (BLEVE); two phase aspects of failure. In: Proceedings of the 39th European Two-Phase Flow Group Meeting, Aveiro, 2001, p. 9Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reid, R.C.: Possible mechanism for pressurized-liquid tank explosions or BLEVEs. Science 203, 1263–1265 (1979)CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shebeko, Y.N., Shevchuck, A.P., Smolin, I.M.: BLEVE prevention using vent devices. J. Hazard. Mater. 50, 227–238 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Birk, A.M., VanderSteen, J.D.J., Cunningham, M.H., Davison, C.R., Mirzazadeh, I.: Fire tests to study the effect of pressure relief valve blowdown on the survivability of propane tanks in fires. Process Saf. Prog. 21, 227–236 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abbasi, T., Abbasi, S.A.: Accidental risk of superheated liquids and a framework for predicting the superheat limit. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 20, 165–181 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbasi, T., Abbasi, S.A.: The expertise and the practice of loss prevention in the Indian process industry some pointers for the third world. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 83, 413–420 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yu, C.M., Venart, J.E.S.: The boiling liquid collapsed bubble explosion (BLCBE): a preliminary model. J. Hazard. Mater. 46, 197–213 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Models for domino effect analysis in the chemical process industries. Process Saf. Prog. 17, 107–123 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: DOMIFFECT: a new user friendly software for domino effect analysis. Environ. Model. Softw. 13, 163–177 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Roberts, A. Gosse, S. Hawksworth (2000) Thermal radiation from fireballs on failure of liquefied petroleum gas storage vessels. In: Proceedings of the IChemE Symposium Series No. 147, pp. 105–120Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Novozhilov, V.: Some aspects of the mathematical modeling of fireballs. In: Proceedings of the IMechE, Part E. J. Process Mech. Eng. 217:103–121 (2003).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maillette, J., Birk, A.M.: Effects of tank failure mode and lading properties on propane fireball geometry and fire hazard. In: Proceedings of the International Conference and Workshop on Modeling and Mitigating the Consequences of Accidents Releases of Hazardous Materials, Louisiana (1995)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J.E.S. Venart, Boiling liquid expanding vapor explosions (BLEVE); possible failure mechanisms and their consequences. In: Proceedings of the IChemE Symposium Series No. 147, pp. 121–137 (2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marshall, V.C.: Major Chemical Hazards. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1987)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Major accidents in the process industries and analysis of their causes and consequences. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12, 361–374 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Accident hazard index: a multi-attribute method for process industry hazard rating. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 75, 217–224 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system. Process Saf. Prog. 17, 157–170 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Inherently safer design based on rapid risk analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 11, 361–372 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Analytical simulation and PROFAT II: a new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries. J. Hazard. Mater. 75, 1–27 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Risk analysis of a chloralkali industry situated in a populated area using the software package MAXCRED-II. Process Saf. Prog. 16, 172–184 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: Assessment of risks posed by chemical industries-application of a new computer automated tool MAXCRED-III. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12, 455–469 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Khan, F.I., Abbasi, S.A.: An assessment of the likehood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect (chain of accidents) in a typical cluster of industries. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14, 283–306 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Abbasi, T., Abbasi, S.A.: Dust explosions—cases, causes, consequences, and control. J. Hazard. Mater. 140, 7–44 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abbasi, T., Abbasi, S.A.: The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE): mechanism, consequence assessment, management. J. Hazard. Mater. 141, 489–519 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Abbasi, T., Abbasi, S.A.: The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE) is fifty… and lives on!. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 4, 485–487 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Pollution Control and Environmental EngineeringPondicherry UniversityPondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations