Elevated Temperature Notch Sensitivity of Inconel 718 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting

Abstract

Notched alloy 718 tensile specimens prepared by selective laser melting (SLM) and wrought bar were tested at 550, 650, and 750 °C. SLM specimens were tested with either an as-printed or a machined notch. For both types there was a decrease in strength with an increase in test temperature; however, the as-built notches are more sensitive to increases in test temperature than the machined notches. At 550 °C, the machined notch exhibits a roughly 20% higher tensile strength over as-built, while at 750 °C there is a 75% increase in strength. The notched strength ratio decreased with temperature for both types of SLM notches samples, while for wrought samples it increased. The temperature dependence of the difference in strength between the two SLM samples indicates that surface roughness—and the corresponding stress intensity factor—are not the only influences on notched strength. Fractography of tested specimens showed a difference in the intergranular crack propagation depth between as-built and machined notches, demonstrating a difference in the environmental susceptibility based on notch preparation that is due to microstructural differences arising in the SLM process that are preserved through heat treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. 1.

    M. Sundararaman, P. Mukhopadhyay and S. Banerjee, Carbide Precipitation in Nickel Base Superalloys 718 and 625 and their Effect on Mechanical Properties, Superalloys, 1997, 718, p 625–706

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    M.J. Donachie and S.J. Donachie, Superalloys: A Technical Guide, 2nd edn. Ingenieria de minas, 2002, ASM International

  3. 3.

    K. Saravanan et al., Dynamic Strain Aging and Embrittlement Behavior of IN718 During High-Temperature Deformation, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2020, 51(11), p 5691–5703

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    U. Krupp, Dynamic Embrittlement—Time–Dependent Quasi–Brittle Intergranular Fracture at High Temperatures, Int. Mater. Rev., 2005, 50(2), p 83–97

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    J.A. Pfaendtner and C.J. McMahon Jr., Oxygen-Induced Intergranular Cracking of a Ni-Base Alloy at Elevated Temperatures—An Example of Dynamic Embrittlement, Acta Mater., 2001, 49(16), p 3369–3377

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    D.B. Witkin et al., Anomalous Notch Rupture Behavior of Nickel-Based Superalloy Inconel 718 Due to Fabrication by Additive Manufacturing, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2019, 50(8), p 3458–3465

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    T.D. McLouth et al., Variations in Ambient and Elevated Temperature Mechanical Behavior of IN718 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting Via Process Parameter Control, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2020, 780, p 139184

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    M. Prager and G. Sines, Embrittlement of Precipitation Hardenable Nickel-Base Alloys by Oxygen, J. Basic Eng., 1971, 93(2), p 225–230

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    D.B. Witkin et al., Influence of Surface Conditions and Specimen Orientation on High Cycle Fatigue Properties of Inconel 718 Prepared by Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 132, p 105392

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    G. Nicoletto, Smooth and Notch Fatigue Behavior of Selectively Laser Melted Inconel 718 with as-Built Surfaces, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 128, p 105211

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    J. Gockel et al., The Influence of Additive Manufacturing Processing Parameters on Surface Roughness and Fatigue Life, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 124, p 380–388

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    A. Suárez et al., Surface Integrity and Fatigue of Non-conventional Machined Alloy 718, J. Manuf. Process., 2019, 48, p 44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nickel Alloy, Corrosion and Heat Resistant, Bars, Forgings, and Rings 52.5Ni 19Cr 3.0Mo 5.1Cb 0.90Ti 0.50Al 19Fe, Consumable Electrode or Vacuum Induction Melted 1775°F (968 °C) Solution and Precipitation Heat Treated. 1965, SAE International

  14. 14.

    G.E. Totten, ASM Handbook Volume 4E—Heat Treating of Nonferrous Alloys. ASM International, Cleveland

  15. 15.

    T. McLouth, Microstructural Control and Elevated Temperature Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting, 2020. UCLA ProQuest ID: McLouth_ucla_0031D_19088

  16. 16.

    ASTM E292—Standard Test Methods for Conducting Time-for-Rupture Notch Tension Tests of Materials

  17. 17.

    A. Calleja et al., Inconel®718 Superalloy Machinability Evaluation After Laser Cladding Additive Manufacturing Process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 97(5), p 2873–2885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    D.M. Krahmer et al., Alternatives for Specimen Manufacturing in Tensile Testing of Steel Plates, Exp. Tech., 2016, 40(6), p 1555–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    ASTM E21 Standard Test Methods for Elevated Temperature Tension Tests of Metallic Materials

  20. 20.

    T. Yang et al., The Influence of Process Parameters on Vertical Surface Roughness of the AlSi10Mg Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 266, p 26–36

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    C. Kusuma, The Effect of Laser Power and Scan Speed on Melt Pool Characteristics of Pure Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Alloy for Selective Laser Melting, 2016

  22. 22.

    T.D. McLouth et al., The Effect of Laser Focus Shift on Microstructural Variation of Inconel 718 Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Mater. Des., 2018, 149, p 205–213

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    E. Yasa and J.P. Kruth, Microstructural Investigation of Selective Laser Melting 316L Stainless Steel Parts Exposed to Laser Re-Melting, Proc. Eng., 2011, 19, p 389–395

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    T. McLouth, Temperature and Strain-Rate Dependence of the Elevated Temperature Tensile Behavior of Inconel 718 Prepared by Selective Laser Melting. Submission in Progress, 2020

  25. 25.

    ASTM E8—Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials

  26. 26.

    R. Qu, P. Zhang and Z. Zhang, Notch Effect of Materials: Strengthening or Weakening?, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30(6), p 599–608

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    S. Azadian, L.-Y. Wei and R. Warren, Delta Phase Precipitation in Inconel 718, Mater. Charact., 2004, 53(1), p 7–16

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    R.P. Wei et al., Oxygen Enhanced Crack Growth in Nickel-Based Superalloys and Materials Damage Prognosis, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2009, 76(5), p 715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    J.F. Muller and M.J. Donachie, The Effects of Solution and Intermediate Heat Treatments on the Notch-Rupture Behavior of Inconel 718, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1975, 6(12), p 2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    C.F. Miller, G.W. Simmons and R.P. Wei, High Temperature Oxidation of Nb, NbC and Ni 3 Nb and Oxygen Enhanced Crack Growth, Scr. Mater., 2000, 42(3), p 227–232

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    V. Trindade et al., Studying the Role of the Alloy-Grain-Boundary Character During Oxidation of Ni-Base Alloys by Means of the Electron Back-Scattered Diffraction Technique, Mater. High Temp., 2005, 22, p 207–212

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    E.G. Wagenhuber, V. Trindade and U. Krupp, The Role of Oxygen-Grain-Boundary Diffusion During Intercrystalline Oxidation and Intergranular Fatigue Crack Propagation in Alloy 718, 2005, p 591–600

  33. 33.

    L.G. Zhao, Modeling of Oxygen Diffusion Along Grain Boundaries in a Nickel-Based Superalloy, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2011, 133(3), p 031002-1–031002-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    S. Floreen and R.H. Kane, Effects of Environment on High-Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth in a Superalloy, Metall. Trans. A, 1979, 10(11), p 1745–1751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    E. Andrieu et al., Intergranular Crack Tip Oxidation Mechanism in a Nickel-Based Superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1992, 154(1), p 21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    M. Gao, D.J. Dwyer and R.P. Wei, Niobium Enrichment and Environmental Enhancement of Creep Crack Growth in Nickel-Base Superalloys, Scr. Metall. Mater., 1995, 32(8), p 1169–1174

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    M. Gao, D.J. Dwyer and R.P. Wei, Chemical and Microstructural Aspects of Creep Crack Growth in Inconel 718 Alloy. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and various derivatives, 1994, p 581–592

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Aerospace Technical Investment Program (ATIP) for their continued support. One of the authors (McLouth) would like to thank The Aerospace Corporation’s Corporate Fellowship for their support as well.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tait D. McLouth.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This invited article is part of a special topical focus in the Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance on Additive Manufacturing. The issue was organized by Dr. William Frazier, Pilgrim Consulting, LLC; Mr. Rick Russell, NASA; Dr. Yan Lu, NIST; Dr. Brandon D. Ribic, America Makes; and Caroline Vail, NSWC Carderock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLouth, T.D., Witkin, D.B., Lohser, J.R. et al. Elevated Temperature Notch Sensitivity of Inconel 718 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. J. of Materi Eng and Perform (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05522-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • additive manufacturing
  • fractography
  • inconel 718
  • notched testing