Investigation of Mechanical and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Properties of Nickel–CFRP Textile Composites

  • Alexandre Tugirumubano
  • Santhiyagu Joseph Vijay
  • Sun Ho Go
  • Lee Ku Kwac
  • Hong Gun Kim


The most common materials used for electromagnetic interference shielding are metals and their alloys. However, those materials are heavy and highly reflective. In order to eliminate or reduce the intensity of wave radiation in their working environment, lightweight materials that have interference shielding properties are needed. In this paper, nickel wire mesh yarns (warps) were woven into carbon fibers-reinforced plastic yarns (wefts) to produce metal–carbon textile composite materials. The plain weave and 2/2 twill weave techniques were used, and the woven fabrics were laminated to manufacture experimental test samples. The nickel, which has high magnetic permeability and good electric conductivity, and carbon fibers, which have good electrical, thermal and mechanical properties, were used together to achieve the desired properties. The shielding effectiveness of each sample was investigated using a network analyzer connected with coaxial transmission line test in accordance with ASTM 4935-99 standard, with the frequencies ranging from 500 MHz to 1.5 GHz. Here, the plain weave structure showed higher shielding effectiveness than twill weave. The absorption losses for both materials were relatively greater than reflection losses. In reference to the orientation of wire mesh yarns about the loading axis, the tensile strengths in the transversal direction were 19.04 and 16.34% higher than the tensile strengths in longitudinal direction for plain weave and twill weave, respectively. The fractography analysis with SEM showed a ductile fracture of wire mesh and brittle fracture of epoxy matrix and carbon fibers.


carbon fibers mechanical strength metal wire mesh plain weave shielding effectiveness twill weave 



This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2016R1A6A1A03012069) and the Korea Government (MSIP) (No. 2017R1A2B4009646).


  1. 1.
    M. Cristian and B. Ionut, Methods for Determining Shielding Effectiveness of Materials, Electroteh. Electron. Autom., 2015, 63, p 129–136Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.W. Tadeusz and M.J. Jaroslaw, Methods for Evaluating the Shielding Effectiveness of Textiles, Fibers Text East. Europe, 2006, 14(5), p 18–22Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Parveen and A. Manju, Microwave Absorption and EMI, Shielding Behavior of Nanocomposite Based on Intrinsically Conducting Polymers, Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes, New polymers for special applications, A.D.S. Gomes, Ed., INTECH, Croatia, 2012, p 71–112Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Petre and E.A. Lia, Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness Evaluation for Materials, Inter. J. Eng. Res. Appl. (IJERA), 2013, 3, p 2329–2334Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.D. Chung, Materials for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding, JMEPEG., 2000, 9, p 350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Yang, K. Lozano, A. Lomeli, H.D. Foltz, and R. Jones, Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Effectiveness of Carbon Nanofiber/LCP Composites, Composites A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2005, 36, p 691–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.H. Kang and S.H. Kim, Electromagnetic Wave Shielding Based on Carbon Mircocoil-Polyurethane Composites, J. Nanomat. Article ID 727024 (2014).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Wu and D.D.L. Chung, Improving Colloidal Graphite for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding using 0.1 μm Diameter Carbon Filaments, Carbon, 2003, 41, p 1313–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    X. Luo and D.D.L. Chung, Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Effective Using Continuous Carbon-Fiber Carbon-Matrix and Polymer-Matrix Composites, Comp. B Eng., 1999, 30, p 227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N.C. Das, D. Khastgir, T.K. Chaki, and A. Chakraborty, Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Effectiveness of Carbon Black and Carbon Fibers Filled EVA and NR Based Composites, Comp. A., 2000, 31, p 1063–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Dinesh, N.M. Renukappa, Siddaramaiah, and J.S. Rajan, Electrical Properties and EMI, Shielding Characteristics of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Filled Carbon Black-High Density Polyethylene Nanocomposites, Comp. Interf., 2012, 19, p 121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N.V. Lakshmi and P. Tambe, EMI, Shielding Effectiveness of Graphene Decorated with Graphene Quantum Dots and Silver Nanoparticles Reinforced PVDF Nanocomposites, Comp. Interfaces, 2017, 24, p 861–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Lin, H. Zhang, P. Li, X. Yin, Y. Chen, and G. Zeng, Electromagnetic Shielding of Multiwalled, Bamboo-like Carbon Nanotube/Methyl Vinyl Silicone Composite Prepared by Liquid Blending, Comp. Interfaces, 2014, 21, p 553–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.H. Phan, M. Mariatti, and Y.H. Koh, Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Performance of Epoxy Composites Filles with Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes/Manganese Zinc Ferrite Hybrid Fillers, J. Mag. Mag. Mater., 2016, 401, p 472–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Ali, The Role of Multi-Walled Carbo Nanotubes on the Magnetic and Reflection Loss Characteristics of Substituted Strontium Ferrite Nanoparticles, J. Mag. Mag. Mater., 2013, 330, p 163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reinforcements for Composites, Manufacturing, Sales and Customer Service. Hexcel, Seguin, Texas.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ASTM D 4935-99, Standard Test Method for Measuring the Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of Planar Materials ASTM 2004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.M. Thomassin, C. Jerome, T. Pardoen, C. Bailly, I. Huyen, and C. Detrembleur, Polymer/Carbon Based Composites as Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Materials, Mater. Sci. Eng., R, 2013, 74, p 211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Lopez, L. Vojtech, and M. Neruda, Comparison among Models to Estimate the Shielding Effectiveness of Applied to Conductive Textiles, Inf. Commun. Technol. Serv., 2013, 11, p 387–391Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.Y. Koledintseva, J. Drewniak, and R. DuBroff, Modeling of Shielding Composite Materials and Structures for Microwave Frequencies, Prog. Electromag. Res. B., 2009, 15, p 197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C.D. Raj, G.S. Rao, P.V.Y. Jayasree, B. Srinu, and P. Lakshman, Analysis of Reflectivity and Shielding Effectiveness of Absorbing Material-Conductor Laminate for Electromagnetic Compatibility, J. Electromagn. Anal. Appl., 2010, 2, p 318–323Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Micheli, A. Vricell, R. Pastore, A. Delfini, A. Giudti, M. Albano, M. Marchetti, F. Moglie, and V.M. Primiani, Ballistic and Electromagnetic Shielding Behavior of Multifunctional Kevlar Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites Modified by Carbon Nanotubes, Carbon, 2016, 104, p 141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Gupta, A. Srivastava, and S. Kale, Thermal Properties of Single and Double Fabric Assemblies, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 2013, 38, p 387–397Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandre Tugirumubano
    • 1
    • 2
  • Santhiyagu Joseph Vijay
    • 3
  • Sun Ho Go
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lee Ku Kwac
    • 1
    • 4
  • Hong Gun Kim
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Carbon TechnologyJeonju UniversityJeonju-siSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJeonju UniversityJeonju-siSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace EngineeringKarunya Institute of Technology and SciencesCoimbatoreIndia
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical and Automotive EngineeringJeonju UniversityJeonju-siSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations