Advertisement

Solar Light Responsive Photocatalytic Activity of Reduced Graphene Oxide–Zinc Selenide Nanocomposite

  • Koushik Chakraborty
  • Sk Ibrahim
  • Poulomi Das
  • Surajit Ghosh
  • Tanusri Pal
Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Solution processable reduced graphene oxide–zinc selenide (RGO–ZnSe) nanocomposite has been successfully synthesized by an easy one-pot single-step solvothermal reaction. The RGO–ZnSe composite was characterized structurally and morphologically by the study of XRD analysis, SEM and TEM imaging. Reduction in graphene oxide was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy analysis. Photocatalytic efficiency of RGO–ZnSe composite was investigated toward the degradation of Rhodamine B under solar light irradiation. Our study indicates that the RGO–ZnSe composite is catalytically more active compared to the controlled-ZnSe under the solar light illumination. Here, RGO plays an important role for photoinduced charge separation and subsequently hinders the electron–hole recombination probability that consequently enhances photocatalytic degradation efficiency. We expect that this type of RGO-based optoelectronics materials opens up a new avenue in the field of photocatalytic degradation of different organic water pollutants.

Keywords

electronic materials nanomaterials semiconductors 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India, via Grant SR/FTP/PS-113/2010. We are also thankful to the University Grants Commission (UGC), and DST, New Delhi, India, for providing special assistance and infrastructural support to the Department of Physics and Technophysics, Vidyasagar University, via SAP and FIST program, respectively.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Chen, W. Ma, and J. Zhao, Semiconductor-Mediated Photodegradation of Pollutants Under Visible-Light Irradiation, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, p 4206–4219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.U.M. Khan, M. Al-Shahry, and W.B. Ingler, Efficient Photochemical Water Splitting by a Chemically Modified n-TiO2, Science, 2002, 297, p 2243–2245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Yang, J. Zhu, and D. Xiao, Microemulsion-Mediated Hydrothermal Synthesis of ZnSe and Fe-Doped ZnSe Quantum Dots with Different Luminescence Characteristics, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, p 8179–8188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Sarkar, S. Acharya, A. Chakraborty, and N. Pradhan, Zinc Blende 0D Quantum Dots to Wurtzite 1D Quantum Wires: The Oriented Attachment and Phase Change in ZnSe Nanostructures, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2013, 4, p 3292–3297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Kim, J. Kim, W. Kim, and W. Choi, Enhanced Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Activity in the Ternary Hybrid of CdS/TiO2/WO3 through the Cascadal Electron Transfer, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, p 9797–9805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Yin, Z. Jin, and F. Hou, Enhanced Solar Water-Splitting Efficiency using Core/Sheath Heterostructure CdS/TiO2 Nanotube Arrays, Nanotechnology, 2007, 18, p 495608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.-H. Liu, Y.-C. Chang, T.B. Norris, and Z. Zhong, Graphene Photodetectors with Ultra-Broadband and High Responsivity at Room Temperature, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2014, 9, p 273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Bonaccorso, Z. Sun, T. Hasan, and A.C. Ferrari, Graphene Photonics and Optoelectronics, Nat. Photon., 2010, 4, p 611–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Bae, H. Kim, Y. Lee, X. Xu, J.-S. Park, Y. Zheng, J. Balakrishnan, T. Lei, H.R. Kim, Y. Song, Y.-J. Kim, K.S. Kim, B. Ozyilmaz, J.-H. Ahn, B.H. Hong, and S. Iijima, Roll-to-roll Production of 30-Inch Graphene Films for Transparent Electrodes, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2010, 5, p 574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Feng, R. Cheng, X. Zhao, X. Duan, and J. Li, A Low-Temperature Method to Produce Highly Reduced Graphene Oxide, Nat. Commun., 2013, 4, p 1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.D. Tran, S.K. Batabyal, S.S. Pramana, J. Barber, L.H. Wong, and S.C.J. Loo, A Cuprous Oxide–Reduced Graphene Oxide (Cu2O–rGO) Composite Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Generation: Employing rGO as an Electron Acceptor to Enhance the Photocatalytic Activity and Stability of Cu2O, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, p 3875–3878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Chakrabarty, K. Chakraborty, A. Laha, T. Pal, and S. Ghosh, Photocurrent Generation and Conductivity Relaxation in Reduced Graphene Oxide Cd0.75Zn0.25S Nanocomposite and Its Photocatalytic Activity, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, p 28283–28290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Chakraborty, S. Chakrabarty, P. Das, S. Ghosh, and T. Pal, UV-Assisted Synthesis of Reduced Graphene Oxide Zinc Sulfide Composite with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity, Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 2016, 204, p 8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Ibrahim, S. Chakrabarty, S. Ghosh, and T. Pal, Reduced Graphene Oxide/Copper Phthalocyanine Composite and Its Optoelectrical Properties, ChemistrySelect, 2017, 2, p 537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Das, K. Chakraborty, S. Chakrabarty, S. Ghosh, and T. Pal, Reduced Graphene Oxide–Zinc Sulfide Composite for Solar Light Responsive Photo Current Generation and Photocatalytic 4‐Nitrophenol Reduction, ChemistrySelect, 2017, 2, p 3297–3305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Chakraborty, S. Chakrabarty, T. Pal, and S. Ghosh, Synergistic Effect of Zinc Selenide—Reduced Graphene Oxide Towards Enhanced Solar-Light-Responsive Photo Current Generation and Photocatalytic 4-Nitrophenol Degradation, N. J. Chem., 2017, 41, p 4662–4671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Liu, L. Tian, and Y. Wang, One-Pot Solvothermal Synthesis of ZnSe·xN2H4/GS and ZnSe/N-GS and Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalysis, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5, p 8414–8422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Chen, T.Y. Xiao, H.H. Li, J.J. Yang, Z. Wang, H.B. Yao, and S.H. Yu, Nitrogen-Doped Graphene/ZnSe Nanocomposites: Hydrothermal Synthesis and Their Enhanced Electrochemical and Photocatalytic Activities, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, p 712–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.H. Hsieh, W.J. Chen, and T.H. Yeh, Degradation of Methylene Blue using ZnSe-Graphene Nanocomposites Under Visible-Light Irradiation, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41, p 13759–13766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W.S. Hummers and R.E. Offeman, Preparation of Graphitic Oxide, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80, p 1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Liu, M. Wang, C. Xu, S. Chen, and X. Fu, Ag3PO4/ZnO: An Efficient Visible-Light-Sensitized Composite with Its Application in Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B, Mater. Res. Bull., 2013, 48, p 106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Q.I. Rahman, M. Ahmad, S.K. Misra, and M. Lohani, Effective Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B Dye by ZnO Nanoparticles, Mater. Lett., 2013, 91, p 170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Zhang, M.-Q. Yang, S. Liu, Y. Sun, and Y.-J. Xu, Waltzing with the Versatile Platform of Graphene to Synthesize Composite Photocatalysts, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, p 10307–10377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.-Q. Yang, N. Zhang, M. Pagliaro, and Y.-J. Xu, Artificial Photosynthesis over Graphene–Semiconductor Composites. Are We Getting Better?, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, p 8240–8254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    U.G. Akpan and B.H. Hameed, Parameters Affecting the Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes Using Tio2-Based Photocatalysts: A Review, J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 170, p 520–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koushik Chakraborty
    • 1
  • Sk Ibrahim
    • 1
  • Poulomi Das
    • 2
  • Surajit Ghosh
    • 1
  • Tanusri Pal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics and TechnophysicsVidyasagar UniversityMidnaporeIndia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsMidnapore CollegeMidnaporeIndia

Personalised recommendations