Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 1475–1482 | Cite as

Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of 2219 Al Alloy During Aging Treatment

  • Huimin Wang
  • Youping Yi
  • Shiquan Huang


Hardness and tensile properties of 2219 Al alloys were tested at various temperature (150, 165, 175 °C) and subjected to T6 temper heat treatment to identify the peak aging time at various temperature. Microstructure evolution and precipitate behavior were analyzed with transmission electron microscope (TEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and x-ray diffraction (XRD). It is found that the peak aging time is 24 h at 150 °C and does not vary down to 165 °C. When the aging temperature rise to 175 °C, the peak aging time down to 12 h. Considering the strength and elongation, the optimum aging treatment is at 165 °C for 24 h after the solution treatment at 535 °C for 1.5 h. Compared with that of only water-quenched sample, after aged at 165 °C for 24 h, the tensile strength of the 2219 Al alloy increases from 324.5 to 411.8 MPa, yield strength from 168 to 310.8 MPa, respectively. The improvement in the mechanical performance is mainly attributed to the precipitation strengthening of the GP zones, θ″ and θ’ phases.


2219 aluminum alloy aging behavior mechanical properties microstructure precipitate 



The authors would like to thank the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant 2012CB619504) and The State Key Laboratory of High Performance and Complex Manufacturing (zzyjkt2014-02) for their financial support.


  1. 1.
    M. Rafi Raza, F. Ahmad, N. Ikram, R. Ahmad, and A. Salam, Development and Strengthening of 2219 Aluminum Alloy by Mechanical Working and Heat Treatment, J. Appl. Sci., 2011, 11, p 1857–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y.C. Lin, L.T. Li, Y.C. Xia, and Y.Q. Jiang, Hot Deformation and Processing Map of a Typical Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2013, 550, p 438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.H. Wang, D.Q. Yi, X.P. Su, and F.C. Yin, Influence of Deformation Ageing Treatment on Microstructure and Properties of Aluminum Alloy 2618, Mater. Charact., 2008, 59, p 965–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.K. Son, M. Takeda, M. Mitome, Y. Bando, and T. Endo, Precipitation Behavior of an Al–Cu Alloy During Isothermal Aging at Low Temperatures, Mater. Lett., 2005, 59, p 629–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Shanmugasundaram, B.S. Murty, and V. Subramanya, Sarma, Development of Ultrafine Grained High Strength Al-Cu Alloy by Cryorolling, Scr. Mater., 2006, 54, p 2013–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.Q. Qu, M.Y. Song, J.S. Yao, and H.Y. Zhao, Effect of Temperature and Heat Treatment Status on the Ductile Fracture Toughness of 2219 Aluminum Alloy, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2011, 689, p 302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Zhang, B.Q. Chen, and B.X. Zhang, Effect of Initial Microstructure on the Hot Compression Deformation Behavior of a 2219 Aluminum Alloy, Mater. Des., 2012, 34, p 15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    X.F. Li, K. Lei, P. Song, X.Q. Liu, F. Zhang, J.F. Li, and J. Chen, Strengthening of Aluminum Alloy 2219 by Thermo-mechanical Treatment, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, 24, p 3905–3911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.H. An, Y. Cai, W. Liu, S.J. Yuan, S.Q. Zhu, and F.C. Meng, Effect of Pre-deformation on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 2219 Aluminum Alloy Sheet by Thermomechanical Treatment, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2012, 22, p 370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y.L. Yang, L.H. Zhan, Q.Q. Ma, J.W. Feng, and X.M. Li, Effect of Pre-deformation on Creep Age Forming of AA2219 plate: Springback, Microstructures and Mechanical Properties, J. Mater. Process Technol., 2016, 229, p 697–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Natan and R.A. Chihoski, Relationship Between Microstructure, Hardness and Electrical Conductivity of 2219 Aluminum, J Mater. Sci., 1983, 18, p 3288–3298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E.M. Elgallad, Z. Zhang, and X.G. Chen, Effect of Two-Step Aging on the Mechanical Properties of AA2219 DC Cast Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 625, p 213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Phillips, High Resolution Electron Microscope Observations on Precipitation in Al-3.0% Cu Alloy, Acta Metall., 1975, 23, p 751–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Natan and R.A. Chihoski, Relationship Between Microstructure Hardness and Electrical Conductivity of 2219 Aluminum, J. Mater. Sci., 1983, 18, p 3288–3298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Q. Feng, L.N. Song, Y.W. Zeng, Y.T. Fang, L. Meng, J.B. Liu, and H.T. Wang, Evolution of fcc/bcc Interface and Its Effect on the Strengthening of Severe Drawn Cu–3 wt.% Cr, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 640, p 45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Z.J. He, Mechanical Properties of Metals, Metallurgical Industrial Press, Beijing, 1982, p 193–196Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.E. Hatch, Aluminum-Properties and Physical Metallurgy, 1st ed., ASM, Metal park, OH, 1983, p 153–183Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D.A. Porter, K.E. Esterling, and M.Y. Sherif, Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, 3rd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009, p 276–304Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.M. Papazian, Differential Scanning Calorimetry Evaluation of Retrogressed and Re-aged Microstructures in Aluminum Alloy 7075, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1986, 79, p 97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Zhang, T. Liu, C.N. He, J. Ding, E.Z. Liu, C.S. Shi, J.J. Li, and N.Q. Zhao, Evolution of Microstructure and Properties of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu–Sc–Zr Alloy During Aging Treatment, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 658, p 946–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of High-Performance Complex ManufacturingCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations