Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 1801–1807 | Cite as

Butt Welding of 2205/X65 Bimetallic Sheet and Study on the Inhomogeneity of the Properties of the Welded Joint

  • Ning-Nian Gou
  • Jian-Xun Zhang
  • Jian-Long Wang
  • Zong-Yue Bi


The explosively welded 2205 duplex stainless steel/X65 pipe steel bimetallic sheets were butt jointed by multilayer and multi-pass welding (gas tungsten arc welding for the flyer and gas metal arc welding for the transition and parent layers of the bimetallic sheets). The microstructure and mechanical properties of the welded joint were investigated. The results showed that in the thickness direction, microstructure and mechanical properties of the welded joint exhibited obvious inhomogeneity. The microstructures of parent filler layers consisted of acicular ferrite, widmanstatten ferrite, and a small amount of blocky ferrite. The microstructure of the transition layer and flyer layer consisted of both austenite and ferrite structures; however, the transition layer of weld had a higher volume fraction of austenite. The results of the microhardness test showed that in both weld metal (WM) and heat-affected zone (HAZ) of the parent filler layers, the average hardness decreased with the increasing (from parent filler layer 1 to parent filler layer 3) welding heat input. The results of hardness test also indicated that the hardness of the WM and the HAZ for the flyer and transition layers was equivalent. The tensile test combined with Digital Specklegram Processing Technology demonstrated that the fracturing of the welded joint started at the HAZ of the flyer, and then the fracture grew toward the base metal of the parent flyer near the parent HAZ. The stratified impact test at −5 °C showed that the WM and HAZ of the flyer exhibited lower impact toughness, and the fracture mode was ductile and brittle mixed fracture.


bimetallic sheet butt welding inhomogeneity mechanical property microstructure 



The authors greatly acknowledge the support from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2013AA031303HZ).


  1. 1.
    M. Acarer, B. Gülenç, and F. Findik, Investigation of Explosive Welding Parameters and Their Effects on Microhardness and Shear Strength, Mater. Des., 2003, 24, p 659–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.A.A. Akbari-Mousavi, L.M. Barrett, and S.T.S. Al-Hassani, Explosive Welding of Metal Plates, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, 202, p 224–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.A.A. Akbari Mousavi and P. Farhadi Sartangi, Experimental Investigation of Explosive Welding of CP-Titanium/AISI, 304 Stainless Steel, Mater. Des., 2009, 30, p 459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Q.L. Chu, M. Zhang, J.H. Li, Q.Y. Fan, W.W. Xie, and Z.Y. Bi, Joining of CP-Ti/Q345 Sheets by Cu-Based Filler Metal and Effect on Interface, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 225, p 67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Devendranath Ramkumar, G. Thiruvengatam, S.P. Sudharsan Debidutta Mishra, N. Debidutta Mishra, N. Arivazhagan, and R. Sridhar, Characterization of Weld Strength and Impact Toughness in the Multi-Pass Welding of Super-Duplex Stainless Steel UNS 32750, Mater. Des., 2014, 60, p 125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Grignon, D. Benson, K.S. Vecchio, and M.A. Meyers, Explosive Welding of Aluminum to Aluminum: Analysis, Computations and Experiments, Int. J. Impact Eng, 2004, 30, p 1333–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Gulenc, Investigation of Interface Properties and Weldability of Aluminum and Copper Plates by Explosive Welding Method, Mater. Des., 2008, 29, p 275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.-B. Ju, W.S. Kim, and J. Jang, Variations in DBTT and CTOD Within Weld Heat-Affected Zone of API, X65 Pipeline Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 546, p 258–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Kacar and M. Acarer, An Investigation on the Explosive Cladding of 316 l Stainless Steel-Din-P355GH Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2004, 152, p 91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Kahraman and B. Gülenç, Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Cu-Ti Plates Bonded through Explosive Welding Process, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, 169, p 67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y.C. Chen, L.W. Tsay, and S.L.I. Chan, Sulfide Stress Corrosion Cracking and Fatigue Crack Growth of Welded TMCP API, 5 l X65 Pipe-Line Steel, Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, 23, p 103–113Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Sadeghian, M. Shamanian, and A. Shafyei, Effect of Heat Input on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Joints between Super Duplex Stainless Steel and High Strength Low Alloy Steel, Mater. Des., 2014, 60, p 678–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.M. Torbati, R.M. Miranda, L. Quintino, and S. Williams, Welding Bimetal Pipes in Duplex Stainless Steel, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2010, 53, p 1039–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.M. Torbati, R.M. Miranda, L. Quintino, S. Williams, and D. Yapp, Optimization Procedures for GMAW of Bimetal Pipes, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 211, p 1112–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ning-Nian Gou
    • 1
  • Jian-Xun Zhang
    • 1
  • Jian-Long Wang
    • 1
  • Zong-Yue Bi
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior for MaterialsXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Baoji Petroleum Steel Pipe Co., Ltd.BaojiChina

Personalised recommendations