Advertisement

Corrosion Behavior of Novel Al-Al2O3 Composites in Aerated 3.5% Chloride Solution

  • P. O. Acevedo-Hurtado
  • P. A.  Sundaram
Article

Abstract

The corrosion behavior of novel Al-Al2O3 MMCs was evaluated in aerated 3.5% NaCl solution through potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). These materials corrode almost spontaneously by pitting in aerated 3.5% NaCl solution. Observations indicate that intermetallic particles in these composites appear to play an important role in this pitting corrosion behavior. Addition of Al2O3 particles to the base alloys did not appear to increase their corrosion resistance significantly, although corrosion rate was affected by these reinforcement particles. In cyclic polarization experiments, the small difference between the pitting potentials and the repassivation potentials for these MMCs indicated their low resistance to pitting corrosion. EIS measurements indicate adsorption/diffusion phenomena at the interface of the composites. Electrically equivalent circuits are proposed to describe and substantiate the corrosion processes occurring in these materials.

Keywords

aluminum matrix composites Al-Al2O3 MMCs corrosion behavior EIS potentiodynamic polarization 

References

  1. 1.
    MIL-HDBK-17-4A, Department of Defense Handbook, Composite Materials Handbook, vol. 4, Metal Matrix Composites, 1999Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Tjong, Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composite, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009, ISBN 978-3-527-40892-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Baboian, Ed., Corrosion Test and Standards: Applications and Interpretation, 2nd ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2005, ISBN 0-8031-2098-2Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Durai, K. Das, and S. Das, Corrosion Characterization of Alumina-Magnesium Metal Matrix Composites, Corros. Sci., 2008, 49, p 1110–1130Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.H. Hihara and R.M. Latanision, Galvanic Corrosion of Aluminum Matrix Composites, Corrosion, 1992, 48, p 546–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.H. Hihara and R.M. Latanision, Corrosion of Metal Matrix Composites, Int. Mater. Rev., 1994, 39, p 245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.K. Alaneme and M.O. Bodunrin, Corrosion Behavior of Alumina Reinforced Aluminum (6063) Metal Matrix Composites, JMMCE, 2011, 10, p 1153–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.A. El-Aziz, D. Saber, and H.E.M. Sallam, Wear and Corrosion Behavior of Al-Si Matrix Composite Reinforced with Alumina, J. Bio. Tribo Corros., 2015, 1, p 5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Vargel, Corrosion of Aluminum, Amsterdam, Elsevier Ltd., 2004, ISBN 9780080444956Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.G. Harvey, A.E. Hughes, S.G. Hardin, T. Nikpour, S.K. Toh, A. Boag, D. McCulloch, and M. Horne, Non-chromate Deoxidation of AA2024-T3: Sodium Bromate-Nitric Acid (20–60 degrees C), Appl. Surf. Sci., 2008, 254, p 3562–3575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Gao, C.R. Feng, and R.P. Wei, An Analytical Electron Microscopy Study of Constituent Particles in Commercial 7075-T6 and 2024-T3 Alloys, Metall. Mater. Trans. A-Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., 1998, 29, p 1145–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Candan, An Investigation on Corrosion Behavior of Pressure Infiltrated Al-Mg alloy/SiCp Composites, Corros. Sci., 2009, 51, p 1392–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Bakkar and V. Neubert, Corrosion Characterization of Alumina-Magnesium Metal Matrix Composite, Corros. Sci., 2007, 49, p 1110–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Metzger, Intergranular Corrosion of Single Phase Aluminium as a Pitting Phenomenon, Colloque, 1975, C4(10), p C4–387Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Datta, B. Samanta, A. Jana, S. Sinha, C. Bhattacharya, and S. Bandyopadhyay, Role of Cl- and NO3- Ions on the Corrosion Behavior of 20% SiCp Reinforced 6061-Al Metal Matrix Composite: A Correlation Between Electrochemical Studies and Atomic Force Microscopy, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50, p 2658–2668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Cervantes, L. Murr, and R. Arrowood, Copper Nucleation and Growth During the Corrosion of Aluminum Alloy 2524 in Sodium Chloride Solutions, J. Mater. Sci., 2001, 36, p 4079–4088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Obispo, L. Murrr, R. Arrowood, and E. Trillo, Copper Deposition During the Corrosion of Aluminum Alloy 2024 in Sodium Chloride Solutions, J. Mater. Sci., 2000, 35, p 3479–3495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.G. Buchheit, M.A. Martinez, and L.P. Montes, Evidence for Cu ion Formation by Dissolution and Dealloying the Al2CuMg Intermetallic Compound in Rotating Ring-Disk Collection Experiments, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2000, 147, p 119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Frankel, Pitting Corrosion of Metals, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1998, 145, p 2186–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. Weilong and G. Frankel, Anisotropy of Localized Corrosion in AA 2024-T3, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2000, 3, p 268–270Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Kiourtsidis and S. Skolianos, Pitting Corrosion of Artificially Aged T6 AA2024/SiCp Composites in 3.5wt.% NaCl Aqueous Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2007, 49, p 2711–2725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Kim and R. Buchheit, A Characterization of the Inhibiting Effect of Cu on Metastable Pitting Al-Cu Solid Solution Alloys, Electrochim. Acta, 2007, 52, p 2437–2446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Hu, W. Chu, W. Fei, and L. Zhao, Effect of Interfacial Reaction on Corrosion Behavior of Alumina Borate Whisker Reinforced 6061 Al Composite, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2004, A374, p 153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Bakkar and V. Neubert, Corrosion Characterization of Alumina-Magnesium Metal Matrix Composite, Corros. Sci., 2007, 49, p 1110–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. Gopinath, R. Balasubramaniam, and V. Murthy, Corrosion Behavior of Cast Al-Al2O3 Particulate Composites, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 2001, 20, p 793–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. De Salazar, A. Ureña, S. Manzanedo, and M. Barrena, Corrosion Behaviour of AA6061 and AA7005 Reinforced with Al2O3 Particles in Aerated 3.5% Chloride Solutions: Potentiodynamic Measurements and Microstructure Evaluation, Corros. Sci., 1999, 41, p 529–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Jafarzadeh, T. Shahrabi, and M. Hosseini, EIS study on Pitting Corrosion of AA5083-H321 Aluminum-Magnesium Alloy in Stagnant 3.5% NaCl Solution, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2008, 24, p 215–219Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Aballe, M. Bethencourt, F. Botana, M. Marcos, and M. Rodríguez, Corrosion Monitoring of the AA2024 Alloy in NaCl Solutions by Electrochemical Noise Measurements, Rev. Metal. Madrid., 1998, 34, p 42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. Cottis and S. Turgoose, Electrochemical Impedance and Noise, Houston, NACE International, 1999, ISBN 1-57590-093-9Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. Candan, Effect of SiC Particle Size on Corrosion Behavior of Pressure Infiltrated Al Matrix Composites in NaCl Solution, Mater. Lett., 2004, 58, p 3601–3605CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Puerto RicoMayagüezUSA

Personalised recommendations