The interfacial reactions between liquid iron and MgO-based refractories were investigated based on the TiO2 concentration values. Substrates comprising MgO, MgO-TiO2 (MT), MgO-Al2O3 (MA), and MgO-Al2O3, at loadings of 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt pct TiO2 (MAT3-15), were reacted with liquid iron at 1823 K by using the sessile drop technique. Microscopic analysis by SEM/EDX and the associated thermochemical calculations by Factsage 7.0™ confirmed the reaction mechanisms of different refractory materials. MgO and MT showed higher resistance against liquid iron penetration compared with MA and MAT3-15, which was attributed to the formation of a magnesiowustite (MO (M = Fe, Mg)) layer formed at the interfaces. Increasing the levels of TiO2 up to 6 wt pct contributed to the denser microstructure of MA. However, the contact angle was lowest for 9 wt pct of TiO2 and then gradually increased up to 15 wt pct. Chemical reactions generating a liquid slag phase contributed to the fluctuations in contact angle with respect to TiO2.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
A.W. Cramb: in: Impurities in Engineered Materials: Impact, Reliability and Control, J.W.C.L. Briant, ed., Marcel-Dekker, New York, 1999.
P.R. Scheller and Q. Shu: Steel Res. Int., 2014, vol. 85, pp. 1310–6.
W.A. Calvo, P. Pena, and A.G. Tomba-Martinez: Ceram. Int., 2019, vol. 45, pp. 185–96.
W.E. Lee and S. Zhang: Int. Mater. Rev., 1999, vol. 44, pp. 77–104.
H. Um, K. Lee, J. Choi, and Y. Chung: ISIJ Int., 2012, vol. 52, pp. 62–7.
J. Jeon, Y. Kang, J.H. Park, and Y. Chung: Ceram. Int., 2017, vol. 43, pp. 15074–9.
H.S. Park, Y. Kim, S. Kim, T. Yoon, Y. Kim, and Y. Chung: Ceram. Int., 2018, vol. 44, pp. 17585–91.
J. Park, J. Jeon, K. Lee, J.H. Park, and Y. Chung: Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci., 2016, vol. 47, pp. 1832–38.
L. Krietz, in Refractories Handbook, C.A. Schanht, ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 2004.
H. Wang, R. Caballero, and D. Sichen: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2018, vol. 38, pp. 789–97.
D. Schmidtmeier, G. Büchel, and A. Buhr: Ceram. Mater., 2009, vol. 61, pp. 223–7
M. Guo, P.T. Jones, S. Parada, E. Boydens, J. V. Dyck, B. Blanpain, and P. Wollants: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2006, vol. 26, pp. 3831–43.
S. Zhang, N.J. Marriott, and W.E. Lee: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2001, vol. 21, pp. 1037–47.
S.H. Heo, K. Lee, and Y. Chung: Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China (English Ed., 2012, vol. 22, pp. 870–75.
Z. Liu, J. Yu, X. Yang, E. Jin, and L. Yuan: Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060883.
A. Mittal, G.J. Albertsson, G.S. Gupta, S. Seetharaman, and S. Subramanian: Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci., 2014, vol. 45, pp. 338–44.
H. Um, K. Lee, K.-Y. Kim, G. Shin, and Y. Chung: Ironmak. Steelmak., 2014, vol. 41, pp. 31–7.
M.K. Cho, G.G. Hong, and S.K. Lee: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2002, vol. 22, pp. 1783–90.
J.S. Park, D.H. Kim, and J.H. Park: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2015, vol. 98, pp. 1974–81.
S. Yilmaz: Ironmak. Steelmak., 2006, vol. 33, pp. 151–6.
E.Y. Sako, M.A.L. Braulio, A.P. Luz, E. Zinngrebe, and V.C. Pandolfelli: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2013, vol. 96, pp. 3252–7.
K.C. Mills, Y. Su, A.B. Fox, Z. Li, R.P. Thackray, and H.T. Tsai: ISIJ Int., 2005, vol. 45, pp. 619–33.
J.H. Zietsman and P.C. Pistorius: Miner. Eng., 2006, vol. 19, pp. 262–79.
P.C. Pistorius: J. South African Inst. Min. Metall., 2003, vol. 103, pp. 509–14
P.C. Pistorius and C. Coetzee: Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci., 2003, vol. 34, pp. 581–88.
Y. Morizane, B. Ozturk, and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci., 1999, vol. 30, pp. 29–43.
H. Park, J.Y. Park, G.H. Kim, I. Sohn: Steel Res. Int., 2012, vol. 83, pp. 150–6.
S.-J. Nam, Y.-B. Kang, S.-M. Jung, and Y. Sasaki: ISIJ Int., 2013, vol. 53, pp. 1779–85.
R. Sarkar and G. Bannerjee: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2000, vol. 20. pp. 2133–41.
S. Maitra, S. Das, and A. Sen: Ceram. Int., 2007, vol. 33, pp. 239–43.
M.A.L. Brauliow and V.C. Pandolfelli: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2010, vol. 93, pp. 2981–5.
S.H. Badiee and S. Otroj: Ceram. - Silikaty, 2011, vol. 55, pp. 319–325.
W.J. Yuan, C.J. Deng, and H.X. Zhu: Mater. Chem. Phys., 2015, vol. 162, pp. 724–33.
www.factsage.com, version 7.2. Accessed April 2019.
W.S. Rasband: ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1997–2018, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
V. Stahleisen and V.D. Eisenhüttenleute: Slag Atlas, Verlag Stahleisen, Dusseldorf, 1995.
C. Xuan, H. Shibata, S. Sukenaga, P. G. Jönsson, K. Nakajima: ISIJ Int., 2015, vol. 55, pp. 1882-90.
C. Xuan, A. Karasev, H. Shibata, and P.G. Jönsson: ISIJ Int., 2016, vol. 56, pp. 765–69.
N. Eustatahopoulos, M.G. Nicholas, and B. Drevet: Wettability at High Temperatures, Pergamon, Oxford, 1999.
The research was supported by the Basic Research Project (GP2017-025) of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning of Korea.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Manuscript submitted April 8, 2019.
About this article
Cite this article
Jeon, J., Kim, S., Kim, M. et al. A Study on the Interfacial Reaction Between Liquid Iron and MgO-Based Refractories Containing TiO2. Metall Mater Trans B 50, 2251–2258 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-019-01656-3