Abstract
The incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures is increasing due to the growing number of THA all over the world and the older age of the population. This article is a review of the literature and an analysis of our cases; the different surgical treatments were described and evaluated. Attention was paid to the border between synthesis and revision.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliografia
Marsland D, Mears SC (2012) A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3(3):107–120
Sheth NP, Brown NM, Moric M et al. (2013) Operative treatment of early peri-prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28(2):286–291
Moore RE, Baldwin K, Austin MS, Mehta S (2014) A systematic review of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with or without allograft strut, cerclage, and locked plates. J Arthroplast 29(5):872–876
Abdel MP, Houdek MT, Watts CD et al. (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties. Bone Jt J 98-B(4):468–474
Lindahl H (2007) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury 38(6):651–654
Cox JS, Kowalik TD, Gehling HA et al. (2016) Frequency and treatment trends for periprosthetic fractures about total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplast 31(9 Suppl):115–120
Pires RE, de Toledo Lourenço PR, Labronici PJ et al. (2014) Interprosthetic femoral fractures: proposed new classification system and treatment algorithm. Injury 45(Suppl 5):S2–6
Abdel MP, Cottino U, Mabry TM (2015) Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review. Int Orthop 39(10):2005–2010
Hoffmann MF, Lotzien S, Schildhauer TA (2017) Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27(1):107–112
Fink B (2014) Revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur. Oper Orthop Traumatol 26:455–468
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflitto di interesse
Gli autori G.V. Mineo, M. Franceschini, O. De Bartolomeo, F. Calabrò e V. Cerbone dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.
Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici
Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti dello studio.
Human and Animal Rights
Per questo tipo di studio non è richiesto l'inserimento di alcuna dichiarazione relativa agli studi effettuati su esseri umani e animali.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franceschini, M., De Bartolomeo, O., Calabrò, F. et al. Fratture periprotesiche di femore: confine tra sintesi e revisione. LO SCALPELLO 32, 46–49 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-018-0245-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-018-0245-0