LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 39–45 | Cite as

Le fratture periprotesiche: scelta della sintesi nell’anca

  • Mario Manca
  • Rossella Sirianni
  • Alessandro Isola
  • Giacomo Giachetti
  • Gianfilippo Caggiari
  • Marco D’Arcangelo
  • Marco Iacopinelli
Aggiornamenti
  • 17 Downloads

Periprosthetic fractures: choosing the correct hip treatment

Abstract

Periprosthetic fractures are constantly increasing. The key to a correct treatment lies in an appropriate classification, preoperative planning and in different surgical options. The management of these fractures is rather demanding, as the surgeon has to face simultaneously a loose implant, poor bone quality or bone loss, in a frail, elderly patient. We suggest an algorithm for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of femur, acetabulum and pelvis, and for interprosthetic fractures.

Notes

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori M. Manca, R. Sirianni, A. Isola, G. Giachetti, G. Caggiari, M. D’Arcangelo e M. Iacopinelli dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and Animal Rights

L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte degli autori.

Bibliografia

  1. 1.
    Capone A, Marongiu G, Planta M (2014) Trattamento delle fratture periprotesiche ed interprotesiche di femore. Capitolo 9. In: AAVV (eds) La fragilità scheletrica nell’osteoporosi e le sue conseguenze. CIC, Roma Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al. (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berry D (1999) Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 30(2):183–190 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chitre A, Jones HW, Shah N, Clayson A (2013) Complications of total hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum. Curr Rev Muscoloskeletal Med 6:357–363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Della Valle CJ, Momberger NG, Paprosky WG (2003) Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum associated with a total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 52:281–290 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J 96-B:713–716 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2005) Modular acetabular augments: composite void fillers. Orthopedics 28:971–972 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D et al. (2008) Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(9):2000–2012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20(7):857–865 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Purtill JJ et al. (2004) Treatment protocol for proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):8–16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G et al. (2003) Biomechanical testing of the LCP—how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury 34(Suppl 2):B11–B19 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solarino G, Vicenti G, Moretti L et al. (2014) Interprosthetic femoral fractures—A challenge of treatment. A systematic review of the literature. Int J Care Injured 45:362–368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Friesecke C, Plutat J (2005) Block A revision arthroplasty with use of total femur prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2693–2701 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soenen M, Migaud H, Bonnomet F et al. (2011) Interprosthetic femoral fractures: analysis of 14 cases. Proposal for an additional grade in the Vancouver and SoFCOT classification. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(7):693–698 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fulkerson E, Tejwani N, Stuchin S, Egol K (2007) Management of periprosthetic femur fracturs with a first generation locking plate. Injury 38:965–972 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Manca
    • 1
  • Rossella Sirianni
    • 1
  • Alessandro Isola
    • 1
  • Giacomo Giachetti
    • 2
  • Gianfilippo Caggiari
    • 2
  • Marco D’Arcangelo
    • 1
  • Marco Iacopinelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Ospedale VersiliaLido di CamaioreItalia
  2. 2.Clinica OrtopedicaUniversità degli Studi di SassariItalia

Personalised recommendations