Abstract
Recent advances in prosthesis design, combined with a better understanding of ligamentous balancing and component alignment have renewed interest in total ankle replacement (TAR) as an alternative to ankle arthrodesis in selected patients. The first generation of total ankle prosthesis failed owing to not congruent and unstable designs. Earlier studies for total ankle replacement found excellent or good results in patients who received a newer generation ankle device compared with patients who underwent TAR with previous implants or ankle fusion. Longer follow-up and randomized controlled studies are necessary, but total ankle arthroplasty has become a viable option for surgical treatment of ankle arthritis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliografia
Kujala UM, Kaprio J, Sarna S (1994) Osteoarthritis of weight bearing joints of lower limbs in former élite male athletes. BMJ 308:231–234
Joseph RM (2009) Osteoarthritis of the ankle: bridging concepts in basic science with clinical care. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 26:169–184
Saltzman CL, Zimmerman MB, O’Rourke M et al. (2006) Impact of comorbidities on the measurement of health in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 88:2366–2372
Lee WC, Moon JS, Lee HS, Lee K (2011) Alignment of ankle and hindfoot in early stage ankle osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int 32:693–699
Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W (2001) Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 83:219–228
Hendrickx RP, Stufkens SA, de Bruijn EE et al. (2011) Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 32:940–947
Gougoulias NE, Khanna A, Maffulli N (2009) History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty. Br Med Bull 89:111–151
Bianchi A, Martinelli N, Sartorelli E, Malerba F (2012) The Bologna-Oxford total ankle replacement: a mid-term follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 94:793–798
Kwon DG, Chung CY, Park MS et al. (2011) Arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for end-stage ankle arthritis: decision analysis using Markov model. Int Orthop 35:1647–1653
Esparragoza L, Vidal C, Vaquero J (2011) Comparative study of the quality of life between arthrodesis and total arthroplasty substitution of the ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg 50:383–387
Krause FG, Windolf M, Bora B et al. (2011) Impact of complications in total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis analyzed with a validated outcome measurement. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 93:830–839
Vickerstaff JA, Miles AW, Cunningham JL (2007) A brief history of total ankle replacement and a review of the current status. Med Eng Phys 29:1056–1064
Piriou P, Culpan P, Mullins M et al. (2008) Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: a comparative gait analysis study. Foot Ankle Int 29:3–9
Doets HC, van Middelkoop M, Houdijk H et al. (2007) Gait analysis after successful mobile bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 28:313–322
Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM et al. (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: part 1: Range of motion. Foot Ankle Int 24:881–887
Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM et al. (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: part 2: Movement transfer. Foot Ankle Int 24:888–896
Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM et al. (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: part 3: Talar movement. Foot Ankle Int 24:897–900
Krause FG, Schmid T (2012) Ankle arthrodesis versus total ankle replacement: how do I decide? Foot Ankle Clin 17:529–543
Barg A, Knupp M, Hintermann B (2010) Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total ankle replacement: a patient-based comparison of pain relief, quality of life and functional outcome. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 92:1659–1663
Barg A, Elsner A, Hefti D, Hintermann B (2010) Haemophilic arthropathy of the ankle treated by total ankle replacement: a case series. Haemophilia 16:647–655
Barg A, Elsner A, Hefti D, Hintermann B (2011) Total ankle arthroplasty in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1427–1435
Bouchard M, Amin A, Pinsker E et al. (2015) The impact of obesity on the outcome of total ankle replacement. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 97:904–910
Kofoed H, Lundberg-Jensen A (1999) Ankle arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 50 years: a prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 20:501–506
Park JS, Mroczek KJ (2011) Total ankle arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 69:27–35
Demetracopoulos CA, Adams SB Jr, Queen RM et al. (2015) Effect of age on outcomes in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 36:871–880
Lord G, Marotte JH (1980) Total ankle replacement (author’s transl). Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 66:527–530
Stauffer RN, Segal NM (1981) Total ankle arthroplasty: four years’ experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160:217–221
Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL (1994) Survivorship analysis of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 76:974–979
Pappas M, Buechel FF, DePalma AF (1976) Cylindrical total ankle joint replacement: surgical and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop Relat Res 118:82–92
Kofoed H (2004) Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res 424:73–79
Alvine FG (1991) Total ankle arthroplasty: new concepts and approaches. Contemp Orthop 22:397–403
Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Sugimoto K et al. (1990) Ankle arthroplasty. A comparative study of cemented metal and uncemented ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 252:209–216
Rippstein PF (2002) Clinical experiences with three different designs of ankle prostheses. Foot Ankle Clin 7:817–831
Hintermann B, Valderrabano V (2003) Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin 8:375–405
Brigido SA, Mulhern JL, Wobst GM, Protzman NM (2015) Preoperative and postoperative range of motion: a retrospective comparison of two total ankle replacement systems. J Foot Ankle Surg. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2014.12.036
Yu JJ, Sheskier S (2014) Total ankle replacement. Evolution of the technology and future applications. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 72:120–128
Zaidi R, Cro S, Gurusamy K et al. (2013) The outcome of total ankle replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Jt J 95:1500–1507
Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE et al. (2009) Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int 30:579–596
Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R et al. (2007) Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 89:1899–1905
Glazebrook MA, Arsenault K, Dunbar M (2009) Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 30:945–949
Rippstein PF, Huber M, Naal FD (2012) Management of specific complications related to total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 17:707–717
Rahm S, Klammer G, Benninger E et al. (2015) Inferior results of salvage arthrodesis after failed ankle replacement compared to primary arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 36:349–359
Myerson MS, Won HY (2008) Primary and revision total ankle replacement using custom-designed prostheses. Foot Ankle Clin 13:521–538
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflitto di interesse
Gli autori Francesco Malerba, Nicolò Martinelli e Giovanni Romeo dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.
Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici
Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.
Human and Animal Rights
L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte dell’autore.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malerba, F., Martinelli, N. & Romeo, G. Nuove prospettive nel trattamento dell’artrosi di caviglia: la sostituzione protesica. LO SCALPELLO 29, 225–230 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-015-0130-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-015-0130-z