LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 163–170 | Cite as

Protesi di spalla in acuto

Aggiornamenti

Shoulder replacement for acute fractures

Abstract

Shoulder replacement for proximal humeral fractures can be performed with two different prostheses: anatomical hemiarthroplasty and reverse total arthroplasty. A careful evaluation of the fracture pattern and the patient, in addition to a rigorous operative technique, are the prerequisites for optimizing the clinical-functional outcome.

Notes

Conflitto di interesse

L’autore Federico A. Grassi dichiara di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and Animal Rights

L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte dell’autore.

Bibliografia

  1. 1.
    Neer CS (1955) Articular replacement of the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg, Am 37:215–228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2008) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-op. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17:202–209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kontakis G, Koutras C, Tosounidis T et al. (2008) Early management of proximal humeral fractures with hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 90:1407–1413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noyes MP, Kleinhenz B, Markert RJ et al. (2011) Functional and radiographic long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:372–377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ (2006) Grammont reversed prosthesis for acute complex fracture of the proximal humerus in an elderly population with 5 to 12 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:543–548 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L et al. (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: A prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 89:516–520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cadet ER, Ahmad CS (2012) Hemiarthroplasty for three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:17–27 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L et al. (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11:401–412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murachovsky J, Ikemoto RY, Nascimento LG et al. (2006) Pectoralis major tendon reference (PMT): a new method for accurate restoration of humeral length with hemiarthroplasty for fracture. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:675–678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krishnan SG, Pennington S, Burkhead W (2005) Shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: restoration of the “gothic arch”. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg 6:57–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bigliani L (1995) Proximal humeral arthroplasty for acute fractures. In: Craig E (ed) Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery: the shoulder. Raven Press, New York, pp 259–274 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sperling JW, Cuomo F, Hill JD et al. (2007) The difficult proximal humerus fracture: tips and techniques to avoid complications and improve results. Instr Course Lect 56:45–57 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krishnan SG, Reineck JR, Bennion PD et al. (2011) Shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: does a fracture-specific stem make a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3317–3323 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frankle MA, Mighell MA (2004) Techniques and principles of tuberosity fixation for proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 13:239–247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amirfeyz R, Sarangi P (2008) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fracture with a conservative rehabilitation regime. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:985–988 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M et al. (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 86:217–219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reuther F, Muhlhausler B, Wahl D et al. (2010) Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: a multicentre analysis. Injury 41:606–612 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loebenberg MI, Jones DA, Zuckerman JD (2005) The effect of greater tuberosity placement on active range of motion after hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2:90–93 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reuther F, Muller S, Wahl D (2007) Management of humeral head fractures with a trauma shoulder prosthesis: correlation between joint function and healing of the tuberosities. Acta Orthop Belg 73:179–187 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu J, Li SH, Cai ZD et al. (2011) Outcomes, and factors affecting outcomes, following shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture repair. J Orthop Sci 16:565–572 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baumgartner D, Nolan BM, Mathys R et al. (2011) Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 6:36 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wieser K, Borbas P, Ek E et al. (2015) Conversion of stemmed hemi- or total to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: advantages of a modular stem design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:651–660 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grammont PM, Baulot E (1993) Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 16:65–68 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mahmood A, Malal JJ, Waseem M (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty—A literature review. Open Orthop J 7:366–372 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Wilde LF, Poncet D, Middernacht B et al. (2010) Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Acta Orthop 81:719–726 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laver L, Garrigues G (2014) Avoiding superior tilt in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review of the literature and technical recommendations. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1582–1590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Favre P, Sussmann PS, Gerber C (2010) The effect of component positioning on intrinsic stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:550–556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Otto RJ, Virani NA, Levy JC et al. (2013) Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1514–1521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM et al. (2005) Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14(Suppl 1):S147–S161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Routman HD (2013) The role of subscapularis repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 71(Suppl 2):S108–S112 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grassi FA, Zorzolo I (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty without subscapularis repair for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Muscoloskelet Surg 98(Suppl 1):5–13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anakwenze OA, Zoller S, Ahmad CS (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:e73–e80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F et al. (2006) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 88:1742–1747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P et al. (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:48–55 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM et al. (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:32–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 95:2050–2055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ferrel JR, Trinh TQ, Fischer RA (2015) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma 29:60–68 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Young SW, Segal BS, Turner PC et al. (2010) Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the primary treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. ANZ J Surg 80:789–793 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A et al. (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1419–1426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli studi del Piemonte Orientale “A. Avogadro”S.C. di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, A.O.U. “Maggiore della Carità”NovaraItalia

Personalised recommendations