Comment on Malanson (2017) “Mixed signals in trends of variance in high-elevation tree ring chronologies” published in Journal of Mountain Science
- 2 Downloads
In a recent paper published in Journal of Mountain Science, Malanson (2017) explored variance changes in Rocky Mountains tree-ring chronologies. This commentary points out some methodological issues related to systematic bias in evolving tree-ring chronology variance and suggests that analyzing the slopes of linear regression lines may be suboptimal for identifying temporal changes in variance. The journal editor invited the original article’s authors Dr. Malandson to respond to the comments. Thus Dr. Malandson’s response is attached behind the comments.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Fowler AM, Boswijk G, Lorrey A, et al. (2012) Multi-centennial treering record of ENSO-related activity in New Zealand. Nature Climate Change 2 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate 1374Google Scholar
- Fritts HC (1976) Tree Rings and Climate. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Fowler A (2018) Comment on Malanson (2017) “Mixed signals in trends of variance in high-elevation tree ring chronologies” published in Journal of Mountain Science. Journal of Mountain Science 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4776-2Google Scholar
- Osborn TJ, Briffa KR, Jones PD (1997) Adjusting variance for sample-size in tree ring chronologies and other regional mean timeseries. Dendrochronologia 15: 89–99. https://ueaeprints. uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/33968Google Scholar