Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 14, Issue 7, pp 1384–1390 | Cite as

Elevational distribution of butterflies in the Himalayas: a case study from Langtang National Park, Nepal

  • Ranjit Pandey
  • Kapil K. Khadka
  • Anuj Ghimire
  • Puja Jha
  • Umesh Pathak


Mountain ecosystems are relatively more vulnerable to climate change since human induced climate change is projected to be higher at high altitudes and latitudes. Climate change induced effects related to glacial response and water hazards have been documented in the Himalayas in recent years, yet studies regarding species’ response to climate change are largely lacking from the mountains and Himalayas of Nepal. Changes in distribution and latitudinal/altitudinal range shift, which are primary adaptive responses to climate change in many species, are largely unknown due to unavailability of adequate data from the past. In this study, we explored the elevational distribution of butterflies in Langtang Village Development Committee (VDC) of Langtang National park; a park located in the high altitudes of Nepal. We found a decreasing species richness pattern along the elevational gradient considered here. Interestingly, elevation did not appear to have a significant effect on the altitudinal distribution of butterflies at family level. Also, distribution of butterflies in the area was independent of habitat type, at family level. Besides, we employed indicator group analysis (at family level) and noticed that butterfly families Papilionidae, Riodinidae, and Nymphalidae are significantly associated to high, medium and low elevational zone making them indicator butterfly family for those elevational zones, respectively. We expect that this study could serve as a baseline information for future studies regarding climate change effects and range shifts and provide avenues for further exploration of butterflies in the high altitudes of Nepal.


Butterflies Indicator species Nepal Range shift Climate change Himalayas 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This study was funded by The Rufford Foundation ( We would like to thank Dr. Monica Papeş (graduate supervisor of the first author) for her constructive guidance during the proposal development. Also, we thank all the referees and the reviewers


  1. Acharya BK, Vijayan L (2015) Butterfly diversity along the elevation gradient of Eastern Himalaya, India. Ecological Research 30: 909–919. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-015-1292-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattarai KR, Upadhyay TP (2015) Rhododendron species richness patterns and impacts of global warming on its distribution in Central Himalayas, Nepal. Botanica Orientalis–Journal of Plant Science 9: 12–19. DOI:10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01013.xGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattarai KR, Vetaas OR, Grytnes JA (2004) Fern species richness along a central Himalayan elevational gradient, Nepal. Journal of Biogeography 31: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhuju UR, Shakya PR, et al. (2007) Nepal Biodiversity Resource Book: Protected Areas, Ramsar Sites, and World Heritage Sites. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology, in cooperation with United Nations Environment Programme, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Kathmandu, ISBN 978-92-9115-033-5Google Scholar
  5. Bryant SR, Thomas CD, Bale JS (2002) The influence of thermal ecology on the distribution of three nymphalid butterflies. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 43–55. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00688.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Central Bureau of statistics, Nepal (CBS, 2010) (, accessed on 2016-10-05)Google Scholar
  7. Chown SL, le Roux PC, Ramaswiela T, et al (2013) Climate change and elevational diversity capacity: do weedy species take up the slack? Biology Letters 9(1): 20120806. DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devictor V, Van Swaay C, Brereton T, et al. (2012) Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nature Climate Change 2: 121–124. DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE 1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Cáceres, M. & Legendre, P. (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90: 3566–3574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1996. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Hughes L (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecology & Evolution 15: 56–61. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01764-4Google Scholar
  12. Jones JI, Li W, Maberly SC (2003) Area, altitude and aquatic plant diversity. Ecography 26: 411–420. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03554.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khanal B, Chalise M, Solanki G (2012) Diversity of butterflies with respect to altitudinal rise at various pockets of the Langtang National Park, central Nepal. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 2: 41–48Google Scholar
  14. Konvicka M, Maradova M, Benes J, et al. (2003) Uphill shifts in distribution of butterflies in the Czech Republic: effects of changing climate detected on a regional scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leingärtner A, Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2014) Species richness and trait composition of butterfly assemblages change along an altitudinal gradient. Oecologia 175: 613–623. DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2917-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lomolino MV (2000) Ecology’s most general, yet protean pattern: the species–area relationship. Journal of Biogeography 27: 17–26. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00377.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCain CM (2009) Global analysis of bird elevational diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18: 346–360. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00443.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Palmer G, Hill JK, Brereton TM, et al. (2015) Individualistic sensitivities and exposure to climate change explain variation in species’ distribution and abundance changes. Science Advances 1: e1400220. DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pandey R, Khadka KK, Papes M (2015) Geographic and taxonomic biases in conservation research efforts in Nepal. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology 4: 89–91.Google Scholar
  20. Pardikes NA, Shapiro AM, Dyer LA, et al. (2015) Global weather and local butterflies: variable responses to a large-scale climate pattern along an elevational gradient. Ecology 96: 2891–2901. DOI: 10.1890/15-0661.1.smCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parmesan C, Ryrholm N, Stefanescu C, et al. (1999) Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579–583. DOI:10.1038/21181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parmesan C (2007) Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Global Change Biology 13: 1860–1872. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01404.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37–42. DOI: 10.1038/nature01286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12: 115–134. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(77)90065-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pollard E (1979) Population ecology and change in range of the White Admiral butterfly Ladoga camilla L. in England. Ecological Entomology 4: 61–74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1979.tb00561.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pounds JA, Fogden MP, Campbell JH (1999) Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398: 611–615. DOI: 10.1038/19297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL Scholar
  28. Roy D, Sparks T (2000) Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Global Change Biology 6: 407–416. DOI: 10. 1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00322.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roy DB, Rothery P, Moss D, et al. (2001) Butterfly numbers and weather: predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate change. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 201–217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2001. 00480.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shrestha AB, Wake CP, Mayewski PA, et al. (1999) Maximum temperature trends in the Himalaya and its vicinity: An analysis based on temperature records from Nepal for the period 1971-94. Journal of climate 12: 2775–2786. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2775:MTTITH>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shrestha UB, Gautam S, Bawa KS (2012) Widespread climate change in the Himalayas and associated changes in local ecosystems. PLoS One 7: e36741. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0036741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smetacek P (2011) On the Anomalous Altitudinal Distribution of West Himalayan Troidini and Papilionini (Papilionidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 65: 126–132. DOI: 10.18473/lepi.v65i2.a5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith C (2011) Illustrated Checklist of Nepal’s Butterflies. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Kathmandu University, Nepal.Google Scholar
  34. Telwala Y, Brook BW, Manish K, Pandit MK (2013) Climateinduced elevational range shifts and increase in plant species richness in a Himalayan biodiversity epicentre. PLoS One 8: e57103. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE. et al. (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145–147. DOI: 10.1038/nature02121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tulloch AIT, Possingham HP, Joseph LN, et al. (2013) Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation 165: 128–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson RJ, Gutierrez D, Gutierrez J, et al. (2007) An elevational shift in butterfly species richness and composition accompanying recent climate change. Global Change Biology 13: 1873–1887. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01418.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu J, Grumbine RE, Shrestha A, et al. (2009) The melting Himalayas: cascading effects of climate change on water, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Conservation Biology 23: 520–530. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01237.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zografou K, Kati V, Grill A, et al. (2014) Signals of climate change in butterfly communities in a Mediterranean protected area. PLoS One 9, e87245. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ranjit Pandey
    • 1
  • Kapil K. Khadka
    • 2
  • Anuj Ghimire
    • 3
  • Puja Jha
    • 4
  • Umesh Pathak
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Integrative BiologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  3. 3.Central Department of ZoologyTribhuvan UniversityKirtipurNepal
  4. 4.Oklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  5. 5.Central Department of Environmental SciencesTribhuvan UniversityKirtipurNepal

Personalised recommendations