Skip to main content
Log in

Regional ecological security and diagnosis of obstacle factors in underdeveloped regions: a case study in Yunnan Province, China

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to clarify regional ecological security status and formation mechanism of regional ecological security barriers in underdeveloped regions of China, we took Yunnan province as a case to evaluate its regional ecological security by using entropy matter-element model, comprehensive index and GIS spatial method, and we diagnosed its obstacle factors through obstacle degree model. We found a low overall level of regional ecological security in Yunnan. Only Kunming fell into the good level, 68% of the regions were below the critical safe level. For the vast majority of regions in Yunnan, their regional ecological security was unstable. The indexes related to per capita resources, geological and topography environment, economic, and technology were at the unsafe or dangerous level. The indexes related to urban expansion, level of income, cultivated land quality were at the level of critical safety. The indexes concerning urban management capacity, air quality and water environment were at the good or ideal level. Yunnan’s regional ecological security was not good due to natural obstructive environment itself, simultaneously lower backward economic and social level restricted the ability of ecological security response to manage ragile ecological environment. The results of the composite index were roughly consistent with those of the entropy weight matter-element model. The mean values of the classification index, from high to low, were: the state index > the response index > the pressure index. The state index and the response index had a significant mutual promotion to each other. The regions with good composite index, state index and response index mainly distributed in the central regions of Yunnan Province. Spatial autocorrelation of regional ecological security level in Yunnan was not obvious. Water resources, economic and social development were main obstacle factors of the regional ecological security. When distinguishing with obstacle type, Kunming belonged to natural ecological environment barrier type, while other regions belonged to economic and social barrier type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cai W (1994) Matter element model and its application. The Science Publishing Company, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang TT, Jiang SZ, Peng WF (2015) Evaluation of land ecological security of Sichuan province based on entropy weight and matter element model. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 31(26): 122–127. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15050119

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (2012) Ecosystem health and ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering 45: 24–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng. 2012.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lange HJ, Sala S, Vighi M, et al. (2010) Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment-a review and perspectives. Science of The Total Environment 408: 3871–3879. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fao (1997) Land quality indicators and their use in sustainable agriculture and rural development. Proceedings of the Workshop Organized by the Land and Water Development Division FAO Agriculture Department 2: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JF, Wang RH, Zhang HZ (2007) Analysis of patterns and ecological security trend of modern oasis landscapes in Xinjiang, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 134(1–3): 411–419. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9632-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, MA HY, Luo ER (1998) China's poverty issues and policies. Reform 4: 72–83. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang LH, Luo WB, Wu CF (2010) Evaluation of land ecological security based on matter element analysis. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) 26(3): 316–322. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.03.054

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Katoch SS (2015) Sustainability assessment and ranking of run of the river (ROR) hydropower projects using analytical hierarchy process (AHP): a study from Western Himalayan region of India. Journal of Mountain Science 12(5): 1315–1333. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-014-3156-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XR, Li YB, Wang YY, et al. (2015) Identification of ecological security patterns for county-level landscapes and function division of the Three Gorges Reservoir area: a case in Fengjie. Chinese Journal of Ecology 34(7): 1959–1967.(In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu MC, Xiong Y, Yuan Z, et al. (2014) Standards of ecological compensation for traditional eco-agriculture: taking rice-fish system in Hani Terrace as an example. Journal of Mountain Science 11(4): 1049–1059. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2738-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu XC, Zhang JQ, Li XZ (2014) Geographical information system-based assessment of ecological security in Changbai mountain region. Journal of Mountain Science 11(1): 86–97. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2293-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian HB, Xue YS, Tian YJ (2001) An overview of resource rational use and assessment. China Land Science 15(2): 14–19. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2001.02.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasul G, Thapa G (2003) Sustainability analysis of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh. World Development 31: 1721–1741. DOI: 10.1016/s0305-750x(03)00137-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz R (2000) Development of environmental indicator systems: Experiences from Germany. Environmental Management 25: 613–623. DOI: 10.1007/s002670010048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HM, Wang HE, Sun HY, et al. (2012) Assessment of the ecological security in the Three Gorges Reservoir area by Using the ecological Footprint Method. Journal of Mountain Science 9(6): 891–900. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-012-2445-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang QR, Tan YZ, Xue JB, et al. (2010) Assessment on the ecosecurity of land use in Tibet based on the superiority evaluation method. China Land Science 24(3): 48–54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2010.03.009

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XL, Su CJ, Peng L, et al. (2014) Ecological suitability assessment and introduction experiment on Rosa damascene trigintipetala in Sichuan Province, China. Journal of Mountain Science 11(3): 805–815. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2802-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu M, Zhu X, Li JZ (2012) Evaluation of land ecological security in Hunan Province based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 34(5): 1265–1272. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi WY, Su WC (2013) Dynamic evaluation of ecological security of Chongqing city Based on attribute distinction theory. Research of Soil and Water Conservation 20(2): 207–212. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Fang L, Cang DB, et al. (2012) Evaluation of land ecosecurity in Wanjiang district base on entropy weight and matter element model. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) 28(5): 260–266. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.05.043

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Wu KN, Yun WJ, et al. (2016) Analysis on temporal and spatial variation of landscape ecological security in modern agricultural area. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) 32(8): 253–259. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.08.036

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu D (2011) Land ecological safety in Poyang lake eco-economic zone: an evaluation based on matter element model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 22(22): 2681–2685. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang FT, Wang LC, Su WC (2016) Evaluation of land ecological security in Chongqing based on the matter-element analysis-DPSIR mode1. China Environmental Science 36(10): 3126–3134. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HB, Liu LM (2006) Main progress and prospects of land resource ecological security. Progress in Geography 25(5): 77–85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2006.05.009

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yan JM, Jiang P, et al. (2013) Normal cloud model based evaluation of land resources ecological security in Hubei province. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) 29(22): 252–258. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.22.030

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JQ, Wu YJ, Ge Y, et al. (2014) Eco-security assessment of poor areas based on gray correlation model: a case study in Enshi. Geographical Research 33(8): 1457–1466. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201408006

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JY, Su WC, Zhang FT (2011) Regional land ecological security evaluation in the case of Chongqing Three Gorges Reservoir economy area based on the PSR model. China Environmental Science 31(6): 1039–1044. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Liu YZ (2013) Evaluation on cultivated land ecological security based on the PSR model and diagnosis of its obstacle. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin 22: 945-951. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Zheng HW, Liu YZ (2013) Evaluation on cultivated land ecological security based on the PSR model and matter element analysis. Acta Ecological Sinica 33(16): 5090–5100. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201209191319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao HB, Ma AJ (2014) Study on early-warning model based on variable weight matter element analysis for ecological security in old industrial bases: a case study of Jilin Province. Acta Ecological Sinica 34(16): 4720–4733. DOI: 10.5846/stx62013 09042205

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou LF (1982) Characteristic and zonality of soil distribution in Yunnan province. Mountain Research 1: 31–38. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Han HQ, Zhang CQ, et al. (2014) Land ecological security comparison in 2000 and 2010. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences 42(5): 228–231. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2014.05.057

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Science-technology Support Plan Projects of China (Grant No. 2015BAD07B0105) and Yunnan Education Department Fund of China (2014Y315). We would like to thank our friends and colleagues for sharing their knowledge and valuable discussions on improvement of evaluation method and index option, particularly Milt McGiffen, ZHOU Ben-zhi, ZHAO Chang-xin, YANG Zhong and LI Xiao-long. Special thanks go to two anonymous reviewers whose comments had greatly helped me to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qing-ke Zhu or Yong-yu Sun.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-8140

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9978-089x

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5506-5889

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ou, Zr., Zhu, Qk. & Sun, Yy. Regional ecological security and diagnosis of obstacle factors in underdeveloped regions: a case study in Yunnan Province, China. J. Mt. Sci. 14, 870–884 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4199-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4199-5

Keywords

Navigation