Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 882–893 | Cite as

Studying the mechanical properties of the soil-root interface using the pullout test method

  • Xiao-dong Ji
  • Xu Cong
  • Xian-qing Dai
  • Ao Zhang
  • Li-hua Chen
Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

It is important to quantify the effect of the root diameter, the embedment length of the root and load speed on the soil-root interface mechanical properties for studying the root anchorage. The soilroot interface mechanical properties can be obtained through the pullout force and root slippage curve (F-S curve). About 120 Pinus tabulaeformis single roots whose diameters ranged from 1 mm to 10 mm divided into 6 groups based on different root embedment length (50 mm, 100 mm and 150 mm) and different load velocity (10 mm·min-1, 50 mm·min-1, 100 mm·min-1 and 300 mm·min-1) were investigated using the pullout method. This study aims to explore the mechanical properties of the soil-root interface in the real conditions using the pullout test method. The results showed two kinds of pullout test failure modes during the experimental process: breakage failure and pullout failure. The results showed that the roots were easier to be broken when the root diameter was smaller or the loading speed was larger. The relationship between the maximum anchorage force and root diameter was linear and the linearly dependent coefficient (R2) was larger than 0.85. The anchorage force increased with the root embedment length. An increase of 10%-15% for the maximum anchorage force was found when load speed increased from 10 to 300 mm.min-1. The mean peak slippage of the root was from 13.81 to 35.79 mm when the load velocity varied from 10 to 300 mm.min-1. The study will be helpful for the design of slopes reinforced by vegetation and in predicting risk of uprooting of trees, and will have practical benefits for understanding the mechanism of landslide.

Keywords

Mechanical properties Soil-root interface Pullout test method Anchorage force Load speed Pinus tabulaeformis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.YX2010-20), the Open Projects Foundation of Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation & Desertification Combat (Beijing Forestry University), Ministry of Education of P.R. China (No.201002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31570708, No.30901162).

References

  1. Bailey PHJ, Currey JD, Fitter AH (2002) The role of root system architecture and root hairs in promoting anchorage against uprooting forces in Allium cepa and root mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany 53 (367): 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.367.333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bransby MFand Ireland BJ (2009) Rate effects during pipeline upheaval buckling in sand. Geotechnical Engineering 162 (GE5): 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2009.162.5.247Google Scholar
  3. Chiatante D, Beltotto M, Onelli E, et al. (2010) New branch roots produced by vascular cambium derivatives in woody parental roots of Populus nigra L. Plant Biosystems 144: 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263501003718612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cofie P, Koolen AJ (2001) Test speed and other factors affecting the measurements of tree root properties used in soil reinforcement models. Soil & Tillage Research 63: 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987 (01)00225-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen D, Lehmann P, Or D (2009) Fiber bundle model for multiscale modeling of hydromechanical triggering of shallow landslides. Water Resources Research 45: W10436. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen D, Schwarz M, Or D (2011) An analytical fiber bundle model for pullout mechanics of root bundles. Journal Of Geophysical Research 116: F03010. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001886Google Scholar
  7. Coutts MP (1983) Root architecture and tree stability. Plant Soil 71: 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coutts MP, Nielsen CCN, Nicoll BC (1999) The development of symmetry, rigidity and anchorage in the structural root system of conifers. Plant and Soil 217: 1–15. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1004578032481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crook MJ, Ennos AR (1998) The Increase in Anchorage with Tree Size of the Tropical Tap Rooted Tree Mallotus wrayi, King (Eufporbiaceae). Annals of Botany 82: 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cucchi V, Bert D (2003) Wind-firmness in Pinus pinaster Ait. stands in Southwest France: influence of stand density, fertilisation and breeding in two experimental stands damaged during the 1999 storm. Annals of Forest Science 60: 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003013Google Scholar
  11. Daniels HE (1945) The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads. I. Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences 183: 405–435. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1945.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Baets S, Poesen J, Gyssels G, et al. (2006) Effect of grass roots on the erodibility of top soils during concentrated flow. Geomorphology 76: 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geomorph.2005.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Zio E, Trupiano D, Montagnoli A, et al. (2016) Poplar woody taproot under bending stress: the asymmetric response of the convex and concave sides. Annals of Botany 118: 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A (2005) A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant and Soil 278: 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Easson DL, Pickles SJ, White EM (1995) A study of the tensile force required to pull wheat roots from soil. Annals of Applied Biology 127 (2): 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb06680.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ennos AR (1990) The anchorage of leek seedlings - the effect of root length and soil strength. Annals of Botany 65 (4): 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ennos AR, Fitter AH (1992) Comparative functional morphology of the anchorage systems of annual dicots. Functional Ecology 6: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferguson PM, Thompson JN (1962) Development length for high strength reinforcing bars. ACI Journal proceedings 59 (7): 887–922.Google Scholar
  19. Gardiner B, Byrne K, Hale S et al. (2008) A review of mechanistic modelling of wind damage risk to forests. Forestry 81 (3): 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpn022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garnier J (2002) Properties of soil samples used in centrifuge models. In Physical Modelling in Geotechnics: ICPMG’02, Proceedings of the International Conference, St John’s, Nfld, 10-12 July 2002.Google Scholar
  21. Ghani MA, Stokes A, Fourcaud T (2009) The effect of root architecture and root loss through trenching on the anchorage of tropical urban trees (Eugenia grandis Wight). Trees 23 (2): 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0269-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ji XD, Song YP, Liu Y (2008) Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on bond strength between steel bars and concrete. Journal of Wuhan university of technology-materials science edition 23 (4): 584–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-006-4584-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamimura K, Kitagawa K, Saito S, et al. (2012) Root anchorage of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtuse (Sieb. Et Zucc.) Endl.) under the combined loading of wind and rapidly supplied water on soil: analyses based on tree-pulling experiments. European Journal of Forest Research 131: 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0508-2Google Scholar
  24. Khuder H, Stokes A, Danjon F, et al. (2007) Is it possible to manipulate root anchorage in young trees? Plant and Soil 294: 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9232-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li SC, Sun HL, Yang ZR, et al. (2007) Root anchorage of Vitex negundo L. on rocky sloped under different weathering degrees. Ecological Engineering 30: 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.008Google Scholar
  26. Liu JKand Shih PTY (2013) Topographic Correction of Wind- Driven Rainfall for Landslide Analysis in Central Taiwan with Validation from Aerial and Satellite Optical Images. Remote Sensing 5 (6): 2571–2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5062571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lombardi F, Scippa GS, Lasserre B, et al. (2017) The influence of slope on Spartium junceum root system: morphological, anatomical and biomechanical adaptation. Journal of Plant Research 130: 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-017-0919-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menzel CA (1939) Some factors influencing results of pull-out bond tests. ACI Journal 35: 517–542.Google Scholar
  29. Mickovski SB, Ennos AR (2002) A morphological and mechanical study of the root system of suppressed crown Scots pine Pinus sylvestris. Trees 16: 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0177-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mickovski SB, Ennos AR (2003) Model and whole-plant studies on the anchorage capabilities of bulbs. Plant and Soil 255: 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026007229517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mickovski SB, Bengough AG, Bransby MF, et al. (2007) Material stiffness, branching pattern and soil matric potential affect the pullout resistance of model root systems. European Journal of soil science 58: 1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00953.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mickovski SB, Bransby MF, Bengough AG, et al. (2010) Resistance of simple plant root systems to uplift loads. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 47: 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Construction of P. R. China (1999) Standard for soil test method. GB/T 50123-1999, Beijing. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Montagnoli A, Terzaghi M, Magatti G, et al. (2016) Conversion from coppice to high stand increase soil erosion in steep forestland of European beech. REFORESTA 2: 60–75. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.2.07.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nicoll BC, Gardiner BA, Rayner B, et al. (2006) Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1871–1883. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nilaweera NS, Nutalaya P (1999) Role of tree roots in slope stabilisation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology & the Environment 57: 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064 0050056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norris JE (2005a) Root reinforcement by Hawthorn and Oak roots on a highway cut-slope in Southern England. Plant and Soil 278: 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-1301-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Norris J E (2005b) Root mechanics applied to slope stability. Nottingham, Nottingham Trent University PHD: 339.Google Scholar
  39. Osman N, Barakbah SS (2006) Parameters to predict slope stability-soil water and root profiles. Ecological Engineering 28: 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peltola H, Kellomaki S, Hassinen A, et al. (2000) Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch: an analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management 135: 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 1127 (00)00306-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pollen N, Simon A (2005) Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank stability using a fiber bundle model. Water Resources Research 41: W07025. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pollen N (2007) Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of stream banks: Accounting for soil shear strength and moisture. Catena 69: 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reubens B, Poesen J, Danjon F, et al. (2007) The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: a review. Trees 21: 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007- 0132-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rossi M, Trupiano D, Tamburro M, et al. (2015) MicroRNAs expression patterns in the response of poplar woody root to bending stress. Planta 242: 339–351. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00425-015-2311-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schelhaas M J, Kramer K, Peltola H, et al. (2007) Introducing tree interactions in wind damage simulation. Ecological Engineering 207: 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.025Google Scholar
  46. Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D (2010) Soil-root mechanical interactions during pullout and failure of root bundles. Journal of Geophysical Research 115: F04035. https://doi. org/10.1029/2009JF001603Google Scholar
  47. Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D (2011) Pullout tests of root analogs and natural root bundles in soil: Experiments and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research 116: F02007. https://doi. org/10.1029/2010JF001753Google Scholar
  48. Scippa GS, Di Michele M, Di Iorio A, et al. (2006) The response of Spartium junceum roots to slope: anchorage and gene factors. Annals of Botany 97: 857–866. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sposaro MM, Chimenti CA, Hall AJ (2008) Root lodging in sunflower. Variations in anchorage strength across genotypes, soil types, crop population densities and crop developmental stages. Field Crops Research 106: 179–186. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.001Google Scholar
  50. Stokes A, Ball J, Fitter AHet al. (1996) An experimental investigation of the resistance of model root systems to uprooting. Annals of Botany 78: 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stokes A (1999) Strain distribution during anchorage failure of Pinus pinaster Ait. at different ages and tree growth response to wind-induced root movement. Plant and Soil 217: 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004613126353Google Scholar
  52. Sun HL, Li SC, Xiong WL, et al. (2008) Influence of slope on root system anchorage of Pinus yunnanensis. Ecological Engineering 32: 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomas RE, N Pollen (2010) Modeling root-reinforcement with a fiber-bundle model and Monte Carlo simulation. Ecological Engineering 36: 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trupiano D, Di Iorio A, Montagnoli A, et al. (2012) Involvement of lignin and hormones in the response of woody poplar taproots to mechanical stress. Physiologia Plantarum 146: 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01601.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waldron LJ (1977) The shear resistance of root-permeated homogeneous and stratified soil. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 41: 843–849. https://doi.org/0.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100050005xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu TH, Mckinnell WP, Swanston DN (1979) Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 16 (1): 19–33. https://doi. org/10.1139/t79-003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang CB, Chen LH, Jiang J, et al. (2012) Effects of gauge length and strain rate on the tensile strength of tree roots. Trees 26: 1577–1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0732-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Soil and Water ConservationBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations