Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Studying the mechanical properties of the soil-root interface using the pullout test method

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to quantify the effect of the root diameter, the embedment length of the root and load speed on the soil-root interface mechanical properties for studying the root anchorage. The soilroot interface mechanical properties can be obtained through the pullout force and root slippage curve (F-S curve). About 120 Pinus tabulaeformis single roots whose diameters ranged from 1 mm to 10 mm divided into 6 groups based on different root embedment length (50 mm, 100 mm and 150 mm) and different load velocity (10 mm·min-1, 50 mm·min-1, 100 mm·min-1 and 300 mm·min-1) were investigated using the pullout method. This study aims to explore the mechanical properties of the soil-root interface in the real conditions using the pullout test method. The results showed two kinds of pullout test failure modes during the experimental process: breakage failure and pullout failure. The results showed that the roots were easier to be broken when the root diameter was smaller or the loading speed was larger. The relationship between the maximum anchorage force and root diameter was linear and the linearly dependent coefficient (R2) was larger than 0.85. The anchorage force increased with the root embedment length. An increase of 10%-15% for the maximum anchorage force was found when load speed increased from 10 to 300 mm.min-1. The mean peak slippage of the root was from 13.81 to 35.79 mm when the load velocity varied from 10 to 300 mm.min-1. The study will be helpful for the design of slopes reinforced by vegetation and in predicting risk of uprooting of trees, and will have practical benefits for understanding the mechanism of landslide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey PHJ, Currey JD, Fitter AH (2002) The role of root system architecture and root hairs in promoting anchorage against uprooting forces in Allium cepa and root mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany 53 (367): 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.367.333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransby MFand Ireland BJ (2009) Rate effects during pipeline upheaval buckling in sand. Geotechnical Engineering 162 (GE5): 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2009.162.5.247

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiatante D, Beltotto M, Onelli E, et al. (2010) New branch roots produced by vascular cambium derivatives in woody parental roots of Populus nigra L. Plant Biosystems 144: 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263501003718612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cofie P, Koolen AJ (2001) Test speed and other factors affecting the measurements of tree root properties used in soil reinforcement models. Soil & Tillage Research 63: 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987 (01)00225-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D, Lehmann P, Or D (2009) Fiber bundle model for multiscale modeling of hydromechanical triggering of shallow landslides. Water Resources Research 45: W10436. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D, Schwarz M, Or D (2011) An analytical fiber bundle model for pullout mechanics of root bundles. Journal Of Geophysical Research 116: F03010. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001886

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutts MP (1983) Root architecture and tree stability. Plant Soil 71: 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutts MP, Nielsen CCN, Nicoll BC (1999) The development of symmetry, rigidity and anchorage in the structural root system of conifers. Plant and Soil 217: 1–15. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1004578032481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook MJ, Ennos AR (1998) The Increase in Anchorage with Tree Size of the Tropical Tap Rooted Tree Mallotus wrayi, King (Eufporbiaceae). Annals of Botany 82: 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucchi V, Bert D (2003) Wind-firmness in Pinus pinaster Ait. stands in Southwest France: influence of stand density, fertilisation and breeding in two experimental stands damaged during the 1999 storm. Annals of Forest Science 60: 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003013

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels HE (1945) The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads. I. Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences 183: 405–435. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1945.0011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Baets S, Poesen J, Gyssels G, et al. (2006) Effect of grass roots on the erodibility of top soils during concentrated flow. Geomorphology 76: 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geomorph.2005.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Zio E, Trupiano D, Montagnoli A, et al. (2016) Poplar woody taproot under bending stress: the asymmetric response of the convex and concave sides. Annals of Botany 118: 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A (2005) A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant and Soil 278: 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easson DL, Pickles SJ, White EM (1995) A study of the tensile force required to pull wheat roots from soil. Annals of Applied Biology 127 (2): 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb06680.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos AR (1990) The anchorage of leek seedlings - the effect of root length and soil strength. Annals of Botany 65 (4): 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos AR, Fitter AH (1992) Comparative functional morphology of the anchorage systems of annual dicots. Functional Ecology 6: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson PM, Thompson JN (1962) Development length for high strength reinforcing bars. ACI Journal proceedings 59 (7): 887–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner B, Byrne K, Hale S et al. (2008) A review of mechanistic modelling of wind damage risk to forests. Forestry 81 (3): 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpn022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier J (2002) Properties of soil samples used in centrifuge models. In Physical Modelling in Geotechnics: ICPMG’02, Proceedings of the International Conference, St John’s, Nfld, 10-12 July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani MA, Stokes A, Fourcaud T (2009) The effect of root architecture and root loss through trenching on the anchorage of tropical urban trees (Eugenia grandis Wight). Trees 23 (2): 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0269-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji XD, Song YP, Liu Y (2008) Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on bond strength between steel bars and concrete. Journal of Wuhan university of technology-materials science edition 23 (4): 584–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-006-4584-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamimura K, Kitagawa K, Saito S, et al. (2012) Root anchorage of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtuse (Sieb. Et Zucc.) Endl.) under the combined loading of wind and rapidly supplied water on soil: analyses based on tree-pulling experiments. European Journal of Forest Research 131: 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0508-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuder H, Stokes A, Danjon F, et al. (2007) Is it possible to manipulate root anchorage in young trees? Plant and Soil 294: 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9232-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, Sun HL, Yang ZR, et al. (2007) Root anchorage of Vitex negundo L. on rocky sloped under different weathering degrees. Ecological Engineering 30: 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JKand Shih PTY (2013) Topographic Correction of Wind- Driven Rainfall for Landslide Analysis in Central Taiwan with Validation from Aerial and Satellite Optical Images. Remote Sensing 5 (6): 2571–2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5062571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi F, Scippa GS, Lasserre B, et al. (2017) The influence of slope on Spartium junceum root system: morphological, anatomical and biomechanical adaptation. Journal of Plant Research 130: 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-017-0919-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel CA (1939) Some factors influencing results of pull-out bond tests. ACI Journal 35: 517–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickovski SB, Ennos AR (2002) A morphological and mechanical study of the root system of suppressed crown Scots pine Pinus sylvestris. Trees 16: 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0177-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickovski SB, Ennos AR (2003) Model and whole-plant studies on the anchorage capabilities of bulbs. Plant and Soil 255: 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026007229517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickovski SB, Bengough AG, Bransby MF, et al. (2007) Material stiffness, branching pattern and soil matric potential affect the pullout resistance of model root systems. European Journal of soil science 58: 1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00953.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickovski SB, Bransby MF, Bengough AG, et al. (2010) Resistance of simple plant root systems to uplift loads. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 47: 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Construction of P. R. China (1999) Standard for soil test method. GB/T 50123-1999, Beijing. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnoli A, Terzaghi M, Magatti G, et al. (2016) Conversion from coppice to high stand increase soil erosion in steep forestland of European beech. REFORESTA 2: 60–75. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.2.07.22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll BC, Gardiner BA, Rayner B, et al. (2006) Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1871–1883. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilaweera NS, Nutalaya P (1999) Role of tree roots in slope stabilisation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology & the Environment 57: 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064 0050056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris JE (2005a) Root reinforcement by Hawthorn and Oak roots on a highway cut-slope in Southern England. Plant and Soil 278: 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-1301-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris J E (2005b) Root mechanics applied to slope stability. Nottingham, Nottingham Trent University PHD: 339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman N, Barakbah SS (2006) Parameters to predict slope stability-soil water and root profiles. Ecological Engineering 28: 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltola H, Kellomaki S, Hassinen A, et al. (2000) Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch: an analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management 135: 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 1127 (00)00306-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollen N, Simon A (2005) Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank stability using a fiber bundle model. Water Resources Research 41: W07025. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollen N (2007) Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of stream banks: Accounting for soil shear strength and moisture. Catena 69: 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reubens B, Poesen J, Danjon F, et al. (2007) The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: a review. Trees 21: 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007- 0132-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi M, Trupiano D, Tamburro M, et al. (2015) MicroRNAs expression patterns in the response of poplar woody root to bending stress. Planta 242: 339–351. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00425-015-2311-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelhaas M J, Kramer K, Peltola H, et al. (2007) Introducing tree interactions in wind damage simulation. Ecological Engineering 207: 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.025

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D (2010) Soil-root mechanical interactions during pullout and failure of root bundles. Journal of Geophysical Research 115: F04035. https://doi. org/10.1029/2009JF001603

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D (2011) Pullout tests of root analogs and natural root bundles in soil: Experiments and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research 116: F02007. https://doi. org/10.1029/2010JF001753

    Google Scholar 

  • Scippa GS, Di Michele M, Di Iorio A, et al. (2006) The response of Spartium junceum roots to slope: anchorage and gene factors. Annals of Botany 97: 857–866. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sposaro MM, Chimenti CA, Hall AJ (2008) Root lodging in sunflower. Variations in anchorage strength across genotypes, soil types, crop population densities and crop developmental stages. Field Crops Research 106: 179–186. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Ball J, Fitter AHet al. (1996) An experimental investigation of the resistance of model root systems to uprooting. Annals of Botany 78: 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A (1999) Strain distribution during anchorage failure of Pinus pinaster Ait. at different ages and tree growth response to wind-induced root movement. Plant and Soil 217: 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004613126353

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HL, Li SC, Xiong WL, et al. (2008) Influence of slope on root system anchorage of Pinus yunnanensis. Ecological Engineering 32: 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RE, N Pollen (2010) Modeling root-reinforcement with a fiber-bundle model and Monte Carlo simulation. Ecological Engineering 36: 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trupiano D, Di Iorio A, Montagnoli A, et al. (2012) Involvement of lignin and hormones in the response of woody poplar taproots to mechanical stress. Physiologia Plantarum 146: 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01601.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron LJ (1977) The shear resistance of root-permeated homogeneous and stratified soil. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 41: 843–849. https://doi.org/0.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100050005x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu TH, Mckinnell WP, Swanston DN (1979) Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 16 (1): 19–33. https://doi. org/10.1139/t79-003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CB, Chen LH, Jiang J, et al. (2012) Effects of gauge length and strain rate on the tensile strength of tree roots. Trees 26: 1577–1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0732-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.YX2010-20), the Open Projects Foundation of Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation & Desertification Combat (Beijing Forestry University), Ministry of Education of P.R. China (No.201002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31570708, No.30901162).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Xiao-dong Ji, Xu Cong, Xian-qing Dai, Ao Zhang & Li-hua Chen

Authors
  1. Xiao-dong Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xu Cong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xian-qing Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Li-hua Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-dong Ji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, Xd., Cong, X., Dai, Xq. et al. Studying the mechanical properties of the soil-root interface using the pullout test method. J. Mt. Sci. 15, 882–893 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3791-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3791-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation