Table 3 Correlations confidence interval

From: The role of customers in the gig economy: how perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services

Pair of constructs Correlation Confidence interval 95% Pair of constructs Correlation Confidence interval 95%
(1)–(2) 0.799 0.755 0.843 (3)–(5) 0.443 0.365 0.521
(1)–(3) 0.693 0.639 0.747 (3)–(6) 0.565 0.497 0.633
(1)–(4) 0.505 0.431 0.579 (3)–(7) 0.668 0.612 0.724
(1)–(5) 0.396 0.314 0.478 (3)–(8) 0.529 0.457 0.601
(1)–(6) 0.590 0.526 0.654 (4)–(5) 0.604 0.54 0.668
(1)–(7) 0.667 0.611 0.723 (4)–(6) 0.581 0.515 0.647
(1)–(8) 0.573 0.507 0.639 (4)–(7) 0.608 0.544 0.672
(2)–(3) 0.501 0.447 0.555 (4)–(8) 0.541 0.471 0.611
(2)–(4) 0.724 0.644 0.804 (5)–(6) 0.521 0.451 0.591
(2)–(5) 0.373 0.285 0.461 (5)–(7) 0.627 0.567 0.687
(2)–(6) 0.521 0.445 0.597 (5)–(8) 0.451 0.375 0.527
(2)–(7) 0.556 0.482 0.63 (6)–(7) 0.873 0.847 0.899
(2)–(8) 0.440 0.356 0.524 (6)–(8) 0.565 0.499 0.631
(3)–(4) 0.524 0.45 0.598 (7)–(8) 0.630 0.57 0.69
  1. Efficiency (1), system availability (2), fulfillment (3), privacy (4), working conditions (5), intention to use (6), intention to recommend (7), price (8)
Back to article page