Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How to explain service failure? Impacts of justifications

  • Empirical article
  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines how justifications that are offered by service providers affect the impacts of inferred motives and negative emotions on perceived fairness after service failure. Some researchers have indicated that justifications enhance perceived fairness, whereas others argue that they decrease the post-recovery satisfaction. After analyzing 270 responses, this study found that justifications mitigate the negative effects of inferences regarding service providers’ motives on perceived fairness, while they amplify the effects of negative emotions. Furthermore, when the affective relationship strength between service providers and consumers is greater, justifications effectively minimize the negative consequences of inferred motives and negative emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alan AK, Kabadayi ET, Yilmaz C (2016) Cognitive and affective constituents of the consumption experience in retail service settings: effects on store loyalty. Serv Bus 10(4):715–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaji MS (2015) Investing in customer loyalty: the moderating role of relational characteristics. Serv Bus 9(1):17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaji MS, Roy SK, Quazi A (2017) Customers’ emotion regulation strategies in service failure encounters. Eur J Mark 51(5/6):960–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bault N, Wydoot P, Coricelli G (2016) Different attentional patterns for regret and disappointment: an eye-tracking study. J Behav Decis Mak 29(2–3):194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies RJ (1987) Beyond “voice”: the influence of decision-maker justification and sincerity on procedural fairness judgments. Represent R Soc Psyc 17(1):3–14. Retrieved from PsycINFO database

  • Bobocel DR, Farrell AC (1996) Sex-based promotion decisions and interactional fairness: investigating the influence of managerial accounts. J Appl Psychol 81(1):22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton LE, Warlop L, Alba JW (2003) Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. J Consum Res 29(4):474–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley G, Sparks B (2012) Explanations: if, when, and how they aid service recovery. J Serv Mark 26(1):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambra-Fierro J, Melero-Polo I, Sese J (2015) Does the nature of the relationship really matter? An analysis of the roles of loyalty and involvement in service recovery processes. Serv Bus 9(2):297–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MC (2007) Says who? How the source of price information and affect influence perceived price unfairness. J Mark Res 44(2):261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MC, Heinrich D, Schoenmüller V (2015) Consumers’ reaction to fair trade motivated price increases. J Retail Consum Serv 24:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnes GA, Cuccia AD (1996) An analysis of the effect of tax complexity and its perceived justification on equity judgments. J Am Tax Assoc 18(2):40–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan HCY, Ngai EWT (2010) What makes customers discontent with service providers? An empirical analysis of complaint handling in information and communication technology service. J Bus Ethics 91(1):73–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CC, Chen CY (2013) Alleviating the negative impact of delayed recovery: process- versus outcome-focused explanations. J Serv Mark 27(7):564–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang S-J, Witteloostuijn AV, Eden L (2010) From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J Int Bus Stud 41(2):178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung MFY, To WM (2016) The effect of organizational responses to service failures on customer satisfaction perception. Serv Bus (in press). doi:10.1007/s11628-016-0328-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang S, Cheng Y, Chang C, Yang S (2012) The effect of service failure types and service recovery on customer satisfaction: a mental accounting perspective. Serv Ind J 32(2):257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifci SD, Erdogan BZ (2016) Antecedents and measurement of brand commitment and behavioural loyalty. J Customer Behav 15(4):321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlon DE, Murray NM (1996) Customer perceptions of corporate responses to product complaints: the role of explanations. Acad Manag J 39(4):1040–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlon DE, Ross WH (1997) Appearances do count: the effects of outcomes and explanations on disputant fairness judgments and supervisory evaluations. Int J Confl Manag 8(1):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazal-e-Hasan SM, Lings IN, Mortimer G, Neale L (2017) How gratitude influences customer word-of-mouth intentions and involvement: the mediating role of affective commitment. J Mark Theory Pr 25(2):200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell CR, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(3):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallarza MG, Ruiz-Molina ME, Gil-Saura I (2016) Stretching the value-satisfaction-loyalty chain by adding value dimensions and cognitive and affective satisfactions: a causal model for retailing. Manag Decis 54(4):981–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbrich K (2010) Anger, frustration, and helplessness after service failure: coping strategies and effective informational support. J Acad Mark Sci 38(5):567–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire Y, Tripp TM, Legoux R (2009) When customer love turns into lasting hate: the effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance. J Mark 73(6):18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hur JU, Jang SC (2016) Toward service recovery strategies: the role of consumer organization relationship norms. J Serv Mark 30(7):724–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias V, Varela-Neira C, Vázquez-Casielles R (2015) Why didn’t it work out? The effects of attributions on the efficacy of recovery strategies. J Serv Theory Pract 25(6):700–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D, du Toit S, du Toit M (1999) LISREL 8: New statistical features. Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econmetrica 47(2):263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltcheva VD, Winson RD, Parasuraman A (2013) Do customer relationships mitigate or amplify failure responses? J Bus Res 66(4):525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavine H, Thomsen CJ, Zanna MP, Borgida E (1998) On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behavior: the moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence. J Exp Soc Psychol 34(4):398–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus RS (1991) Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. Am Psychol 46(8):819–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki RJ, Polin B, Lount RB (2016) An exploration of the structure of effective apologies. Negot Conf Manag Res 9(2):177–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CY, Fang YH (2016) How online service recovery approaches bolster recovery performance? A multi-level perspective. Serv Bus 10(1):179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila AS (2006) The power of explanations in mitigating the ill-effects of service failures. J Serv Mark 20(7):422–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila AS, Hanks L, Wang C (2014) Others service experiences: emotions, perceived justice, and behavior. Eur J Mark 48(3/4):552–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McColl-Kennedy JR, Sparks BA (2003) Application of fairness theory to service failure and service recovery. J Serv Res 5(3):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1990) Applied linear regression models. Homewood, Irwin, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikbin D, Ismail I, Marimuthu M (2013) The relationship between informational justice, recovery satisfaction, and loyalty: the moderating role of failure attributions. Serv Bus 7(3):419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven K, Healy C (2016) Susceptibility to the ‘dark side’ of goal-setting: does moral justification influence the effect of goals on unethical behavior? J Bus Ethics 137(1):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinares-Lara E, Olarte-Pascual C, Pelegrín-Borondo J, Pino G (2016) Nanoimplants that enhance human capabilities: a cognitive-affective approach to assess individuals’ acceptance of this controversial technology. Pcychol Mark 33(9):704–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ro H (2014) Complaint, patience, and neglect: responses to a dissatisfying service experience. Serv Bus 8(2):197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber JBN, Amaury FK, Stage EA, Barlow KJ (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 99(6):323–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle S, Udell JG (1970) The use of regression on dummy variables in management research. Manag Sci 16(6):B397–B409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serviere-Munoz L, Mallin ML (2013) How do unethical salespeople sleep at night? The role of neutralizations in the justification of unethical sales intentions. J Pers Sell Sales Manag 33(3):289–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw JC, Wild E, Colquitt JA (2003) To justify or excuse? A meta-analysis review of the effects of explanations. J Appl Psychol 88(3):444–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv B, Fedorikhin A (1999) Heart and mind in conflict: the interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. J Consum Res 26(3):278–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AK, Bolton RN, Wagner J (1999) A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. J Mark Res 36(3):356–372

  • Sparks BA, Fredline E (2007) Providing an explanation for service failure: context, content and customer responses. J Hosp Tour Res 31(2):241–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tektas OO (2016) Perceived justice and post-recovery satisfaction in banking service failures: do commitment types matter? Serv Bus (in press). doi:10.1007/s11628-016-0333-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CC, Yang Y-K, Cheng Y-C (2014) Does relationship matter? Customers’ response to service failure. Manag Serv Qual 24(2):139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls AR, Okumus F, Wang Y (2011) Cognition and affect interplay: a framework for the tourist vacation decision-making process. J Travel Tour Mark 28(5):567–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CY, Mattila AS (2011) A cross-cultural comparison of perceived informational fairness with service failure explanation. J Serv Mark 75(6):429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CY, Mattila AS, Bartlett A (2009) An examination of explanation typology on perceived informational fairness in the context of air travel. J Travel Tour Mark 26(8):759–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagil D, Luria G (2016) Customer forgiveness of unsatisfactory service: manifestations and antecedents. Serv Bus 10(3):557–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C-C, Chen P-S, Chien Y-H (2014) Customer expertise, affective commitment, customer participation and loyalty in B&B service. Int J Organ Innov 6(4):174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoh P-L, Woolford SW, Eshghi A, Butaney G (2015) Customer response to service recovery in online shopping. J Serv Res 14(2):33–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors sincerely appreciate the precious comments from the two anonymous reviewers and the financial aid from the National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC101 -2410-H-168-005-SSS].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to WeiWei Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W., Lee, HC. How to explain service failure? Impacts of justifications. Serv Bus 12, 331–356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-017-0349-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-017-0349-2

Keywords

Navigation