Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Governing time for sustainability: analyzing the temporal implications of sustainability governance

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • The politics of making and un-making (sustainable) futures
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idea of sustainability comes with numerous temporal ambitions and implications. It can be interpreted as a call to rethink and redesign the prevailing temporal orders of human–nature relationships in terms of governance. While there are multiple approaches to sustainability governance that implicitly or explicitly engage with time, the concrete links between time and sustainability-oriented governance remain largely unclear. The aim of this article is, therefore, to provide a more nuanced and critical picture of the temporal implications of sustainability governance. To this end, it reconstructs various exemplary approaches to sustainability governance from two analytical perspectives, namely governance of time and governance by time. On this basis, it is further argued that the interplay of different practices of sustainability-oriented governance creates different “timescapes of sustainability” with different normative and political implications. Proposals for future research and practice on the relationship between sustainability governance and time are derived from the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Being aware of the differences between these two concepts, we will use them synonymously in the remainder of this article.

References

  • Adam B (1990) Time and social theory. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam B (1998) Timescapes of modernity. The environment and invisible hazards. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam B (2003) Reflexive modernization temporalized. Theory Cult Soc 20(2):59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adelle C, Weiland S (2012) Policy assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Apprais 30(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger NW, Jordan A (eds) (2009) Governing sustainability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Angheloiu C, Chaudhuri G, Sheldrick L (2017) Future tense: alternative futures as a design method for sustainability transitions. Des J 20:S3213–S3225

    Google Scholar 

  • Auclair E, Fairclough G (2015a) Living between past and future. An introduction to heritage and cultural sustainability. In: Auclair E, Fairclough G (eds) Theory and practice in heritage and sustainability. Between past and future. Routledge, London, pp 1–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Auclair E, Fairclough G (eds) (2015b) Theory and practice in heritage and sustainability. Between past and future. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aykut SC (2015) Energy futures from the social market economy to the Energiewende: the politicization of West German energy debates, 1950–1990. In: Andersson J, Rindzeviciute E (eds) The Struggle for the long-term in transnational science and politics: forging the future. Routledge, London, pp 93–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Aykut SC (2016) Taking a wider view on climate governance: moving beyond the ‘iceberg’, the ‘elephant’, and the ‘forest’. WIREs Clim Change 7:318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker S (2007) Sustainable development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbehön M (2018) Ever more complex, uncertain and urging? ›Wicked problems‹ from the perspective of antinaturalist conceptualizations of time. Z Diskurs 3:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (2006) Reflexive governance: politics in the global risk society. In: Voss J-P, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 31–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert J (2016) Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir M (2013) Governance as theory, practice and dilemma. In: Bevir M (ed) The SAGE handbook of governance. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemann B (2014) Policy-Integration und Nachhaltigkeit. Integrative Politik in der Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie der deutschen Bundesregierung, 2nd edn. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemann B, Schmidt S, Schubert S (2016) Governing uncertainties in sustainable energy transitions—insights from local heat supply in Switzerland. Urban Plan (UP) 1(3):38–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornemann B, Lange P, Burger P (2019) Toward systematic understandings of sustainability governance. A conceptual meta-framework. In: Hamman P (ed) Sustainability governance and hierarchy. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger P, Christen M (2011) Towards a capability approach of sustainability. J Clean Prod 19(8):787–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter P (2016) Time tactics: project managing policy implementation in a network. Time Soc. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0961463X16682517

  • Dobson A (1996) Representative democracy and the environment. In: Lafferty WM, Meadowcroft J (eds) Democracy and the environment. Problems and prospects. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 124–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek J (1997) The politics of the earth. Environmental discourses. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Pisani JA (2006) Sustainable development—historical roots of the concept. Environ Sci 3(2):83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elchardus M (1988) The rediscovery of Chronos: the new role of time in sociological theory. Int Sociol 3(1):35–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felt U, Felder K, Öhler T, Penkler M (2014) Timescapes of obesity: coming to terms with a complex socio-medical phenomenon. Health 18(6):646–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F (2017) Climate crisis and the democratic prospect: participatory governance in sustainable communities. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Ricoy I, Gosseries A (eds) (2016) Institutions for future generations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2007) Working towards sustainable development in the face of uncertainty and incomplete knowledge. J Environ Plan Policy Manage 9(3):245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry AD (2018) Learning sustainability innovations. Nat Sustain 1(4):164–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M (2009) Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: lessons from Canada. Can Public Adm 52:153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M, Goetz KH (2014) Introduction: time, temporality and timescapes in administration and policy. Int Rev Admin Sci 80(3):477–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutson MA (2010) Power, politics, and community development. Community Dev 44:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T (2011) Prosperity without growth. Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs M (1999) Sustainable development as a contested concept. In: Dobson A (ed) Fairness and futurity. Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Parto S, Gibson RB (2005) Governance for sustainable development. Moving from theory to practice. IJSD 8(1/2):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2007) Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14(1):78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman J (2007) Governing as governance. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty WM, Langhelle O (1999) Sustainable development as concept and norm. In: Lafferty W, Langhelle O (eds) Towards sustainable development. On the goals of development—and the conditions of sustainability. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange P, Driessen PPJ, Sauer A, Bornemann B, Burger P (2013) Governing towards sustainability—conceptualizing modes of governance. J Environ Plann Policy Manage 15(3):403–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2017) Facing Gaia: eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D (2010) Transition Management for sustainable development: a prescriptive. complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23(1):161–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lövbrand E, Beck S, Chilvers J, Forsyth T, Hedrén J, Hulme M, Lidskog R, Vasileiadou E (2015) Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Glob Environ Change 32:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft J (2000) Sustainable development: a New(ish) idea for a new century? Polit Stud 48(2):370–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft J, Steurer R (2013) Assessment practices in the policy and politics cycles: a contribution to reflexive governance for sustainable development? J Environ Pol Plan 20(6):734–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuleman L, Veld RJ (2009) Sustainable development and the governance of long-term decisions. RMNO, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller CA (2005) New civic epistemologies of quantification: making sense of indicators of local and global sustainability. Sci Technol Hum Values 30:403–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Voss J-P, Monstadt J (eds) (2008) Governance for sustainable development. Coping with ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (2003) Searching for sustainability. Interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny H (1996) Time. The modern and postmodern experience. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykvist B, Heland J von (2014) Social-ecological memory as a source of general and specified resilience. Ecology and Society 19(2)

  • Pollitt C (2008) Time, policy, management. Governing with the past. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa H (2015) Social acceleration. A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa H, Scheuerman WE (eds) (2011) High-speed society. Social acceleration, power, and modernity. Penn State University Press, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH (1997) Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions? Environ Model Assess 2(4):229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuitmaker TJ (2012) Identifying and unravelling persistent problems. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(6):1021–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz WL, Crews C, Lum R (2012) Scenarios: a hero’s journey across turbulent systems. J Futures Stud 17:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Selin C (2008) The sociology of the future: tracing stories of technology and time. Sociol Compass 2(6):1878–1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengers F, Wieczorek AJ, Raven R (2016) Experimenting for sustainability transitions: a systematic literature review. Technol Forecast Soc Change. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516302530

  • Stirling A (2014) Emancipating transformations: from controlling “the transition” to culturing plural radical progress. STEPS working paper 64, Brighton

  • Strassheim H (2016) Knowing the future: theories of time in policy analysis. Eur Policy Anal (EPA) 2(1):150–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßheim H (2018) Policy as a body of expertise. In: Colebatch HK, Hoppe R (eds) Handbook on policy, process and governing. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 89–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson D, Pintér L (2007) Governance structures for national sustainable development strategies. In: OECD (ed) Institutionalising sustainable development. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), Paris, pp 33–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (2005) Complex knowledge. Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12):817–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchione E (2012) Deliberating beyond evidence: lessons from integrated assessment modelling. Iddri working papers

  • Vergragt PJ, Quist J (2011) Backcasting for sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(5):747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss J-P, Bornemann B (2011) The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecol Soc 16(2):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss J-P, Freeman R (eds) (2016) Knowing governance. The epistemic construction of political order. Palgrave Studies in Science, Knowledge and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss J-P, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) (2006) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss J-P, Smith A, Grin J (2009) Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy Sci 42(4):275–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallimann-Helmer I, Meyer L, Burger P (2017) Democracy for the future: a conceptual framework to assess institutional reform. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik 21(1):197–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiland S, Bleicher A, Polzin C, Rauschmayer F, Rode J (2017) The nature of experiments for sustainability transformations: a search for common ground. J Clean Prod 169(15):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipp R, Adam B, Sabelis I (eds) (2002) Making time. Time and management in modern organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basil Bornemann.

Additional information

Handled by: Henrike Knappe, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Germany.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bornemann, B., Strassheim, H. Governing time for sustainability: analyzing the temporal implications of sustainability governance. Sustain Sci 14, 1001–1013 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00683-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00683-y

Keywords

Navigation