Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring solutions for healthy, safe, and sustainable fatty acids (EPA and DHA) consumption in The Netherlands

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advisory bodies such as the World Health Organization and the Dutch Health Council (DHC) recommend including fatty fish in one’s diet, based on the health benefits of their content of n − 3 poly unsaturated fatty acids (eicosapentaenoic acid—EPA and docosahexaenoic acid—DHA) being, i.e., the reduction of the risk of fatal cardio vascular disease and stroke. These dietary advices on these fatty acids’ (e.g., fatty fish) consumption are only based on the expected health benefits. But what would a dietary advice look like when the health benefits were weighed up against relevant sustainability and food safety considerations? The aim of the current study was to explore the consequences for safety, health, and sustainability of solutions to meet the DHC’s recommendation on EPA/DHA consumption. To this end, first, the health, food safety, and sustainability perspectives of the current fish production and consumption, being the main source of EPA/DHA, were identified. Second, alternative diet scenarios, meeting the daily advised intake of EPA/DHA, were collected and subsequently judged on their health, safety and (environmental) sustainability characteristics. To enable structuring the process of finding solutions for such complex problems, a specific framework was applied: solution-focused sustainability assessment. Based on stakeholder consultation, three scenarios were assessed: higher production and consumption of fatty fish (here: farmed salmon); increased human use of by-catch and discards; and increased consumption of alternative EPA/DHA sources (here: walnuts). It appeared that only in the scenario of increased use of by-catch and discards, the effects on human health and the environment and resources coincide, whereas in the other two scenarios, the positive health effects are expected to result in one or more negative effects on the environment. Besides, increased fish consumption causes more food safety problems; however, if one changes his/her diet and replaces meat by fish, this will lead to a net higher food safety. The analysis shows the sustainability limits of increased production and consumption of fatty fish and alternative EPA/DHA sources. This can support policy makers in setting goals and deciding on measures to encourage healthy and environmentally sustainable fish (i.e., EPA/DHA) consumption. Furthermore, this study shows in general the impact a policy initiative focusing on health aspects only can have on other aspects, such as environment and food safety. It emphasizes the added value of integrative assessments, which cover multiple effects when designing new sustainable policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adarme-Vega TC, Lim D, Timmins M, Vernen F, Li Y, Schenk PM (2012) Microalgal biofactories: a promising approach towards sustainable omega-3 fatty acid production. Microb Cell Fact 11:96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adarme-Vega TC, Thomas-Hall SR, Schenk PM (2014) Towards sustainable sources for omega-3 fatty acids production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 26:14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.08.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Dulvy NK, Gladstone W, Winfield IJ (2016) Fish conservation in freshwater and marine realms: status, threats and management. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26:838–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekema R (2015) Life Cycle Inventories of fish products consumed in The Netherlands. Guidance document. Blonk Consultants Gouda

  • Cury P, Mullon C, Garcia SM, Shannon L (2003) Viability theory for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci 62:577–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK, Thrush SF, Agardy T, Hofman RJ (1995) Viewpoint: environmental effects of marine fishing. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 5:205–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mul A, Bakker M, Zeilmaker MJ, Traag WA, Van Leeuwen SPJ, Hoogenboom RLAP, Boon PE, Van Klaveren JD (2008) Dietary exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in The Netherlands anno 2004. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 51:278–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Valk E, Hollander A, Zijp M (2016) Milieubelasting van de Nederlandse voedselconsumptie. RIVM rapport 2016-00 (in Dutch)

  • FAO/WHO (2011) Report of the joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on the risks and benefits of fish consumption. FAO, WHO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett T (2013) Food sustainability: problems, perspectives and solutions. Proc Nutr Soc 72:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665112002947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gezondheidsraad (2015) Richtlijnen goede voeding. Gezondheidsraad publicatienr. 2015/24. ISBN 978-94-6281-089-1 (in Dutch)

  • Gislason H (2003) The effect of fishing on non-target species and ecosystem structure and function. In: Sinclair M, Valdimarsson G (eds) Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. FAO and CAB International, Rome, pp 255–274

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon TAC, Harding HR, Clever TK, Davidson IK, Davison W, Montgomery DW, Weatherhead RC, Windsor FM, Armstrong FM, Bardonnet A, Bergman E, Britton JR, Côté D, D’agostino D, Greenberg LA, Harborne AR, Kahilainen K, Metcalfe NB, Mills SC, Milner NJ, Mittermayer FH, Montorio L, Nedelec SL, Prokkola JM, Rutterford LA, Salvanes AGV, Simpson SD, Vainikka A, Pinnegar JK, Santos EM (2018) Fishes in a changing world: learning from the past to promote sustainability of fish populations. J Fish Biol 92:804–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goudswaard K (2015) Van Discards naar Bijvangst in de Pelagische Visserij. Rapport C067/15; Wageningen IMARES (in Dutch)

  • Harlioğlu AG, Aydin S, Yilmaz Ö (2012) Fatty acid, cholesterol and fat-soluble vitamin composition of wild and captive freshwater crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus). Food Sci Technol Int 18:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013211414261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Havelaar AH, Galindo AV, Kurowicka D, Cooke DM (2008) Attribution of foodborne pathogens using structured expert elicitation. Foodborne Pathog Dis 5:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havelaar AH, Haagsma JA, Mangen MJJ, Kemmeren JM, Verhoef LPB, Vijgen SMC, Wilson M, Friesema IHM, Kortbeek LM, Van Duynhoven YTHP, Van Pelt W (2012) Disease burden of foodborne pathogens in The Netherlands. Int J Food Microbiol 156:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra J, Hart A, Owen H, Zeilmaker M, Bokkers B, Thorgilsson B, Gunnlaugsdottir H (2013) Fish, contaminants and human health: quantifying and weighing benefits and risks. Food Chem Toxicol 54:18–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom LAP, Bovee THF, Kloet D, De Waal E, Kleter G, Van Leeuwen SPJ, Pieters H, De Boer J (2003) Contaminanten in vis- en visproducten; Mogelijke risico’s voor de consument en adviezen voor monitoring, RIKILT Rapport 2003.015 (in Dutch)

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, Zijp M, Hollander A, Van Zelm R (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J LCA. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson A (2009) The continuing demand for sustainable fishmeal and fish oil in aquaculture diets. Int Aquafeed 12:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • JECFA (2002) Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants, WHO Food Additives Series 48, WHO, Geneva

  • Murray J, Burt JR (2001) The composition of fish. FAO in partnership with Support unit for International Fisheries and Aquatic Research

  • Naylor RL, Goldberg RJ, Mooney H, Beveridge MC, Clay J, Folk C, Kautsky N, Lubchenco J, Primavera J, Williams M (1998) Nature’s subsidies to shrimp and salmon farming. Nature 282:883–884

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1038/35016500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols PD, Petrie J, Singh S (2010) Long-chain omega-3 oils-an update on sustainable sources. Nutrients 2:572–585. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2060572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Risher JF, Murray HE, Prince GR (2002) Organic mercury compounds: human exposure and its relevance to public health. Toxicol Ind Health 18:109–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sérot T, Gandemer G, Demaimay M (1998) Lipid and fatty acid compositions of muscle from farmed and wild adult turbot. Aquac Int 6:331–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009284905854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seves SM, Temme EHM, Brosens MCC, Zijp MC, Hoekstra J, Hollander A (2015) Sustainability aspects and nutritional composition of fish: evaluation of wild and cultivated fish species consumed in The Netherlands. Clim Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1581-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trites AW (2003) Food webs in the oceans: who eats whom and how much? In: Sinclair M, Valdimarsson G (eds) Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. FAO and CAB International, Rome, pp 125–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg M, Birnbaum LS, Denison M, De Vito M, Farland W, Feeley M, Fiedler H, Hakansson H, Hanberg A, Haws L, Rose M, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tohyama C, Tritscher A, Tuomisto J, Tysklind M (2006) The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci 93(2):223–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zakerim M (2011) Variations in lipid content and fatty acids composition in wild and cultured Yellowfin Seabream Acanthopagrus latus in the Persian Gulf. J Persian Gulf 2:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeilmaker MJ, Hoekstra J, Van Eijkeren JCH, De Jong N, Hart A, Kennedy M, Owen H, Gunnlaugsdottir H (2012) Fish consumption during child bearing age: a quantitative risk–benefit analysis on neurodevelopment. Food Chem Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.10.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zijp MC, Posthuma L, Devilee J, Wintersen A, Swartjes F (2016) Definition and use of solution-focused sustainability assessment: a novel approach to generate, explore and decide on sustainable solutions for wicked problems. Environ Int 91:319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by RIVM’s strategic research program, run under the auspices of the Director-General of RIVM and RIVM’s Scientific Advisory Board, under the projects FISSH (S/133017) and SOFOCLES (S/607020). We thank the members of the scientific advisory group of the project and the stakeholders that contributed to the workshops and who were available for interviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hollander.

Additional information

Handled by Carolyn Lundquist, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11625_2018_607_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 36 kb) Review on food safety and environmental sustainability issues related to fish consumption

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 21 kb) Stakeholder workshop

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hollander, A., De Jonge, R., Biesbroek, S. et al. Exploring solutions for healthy, safe, and sustainable fatty acids (EPA and DHA) consumption in The Netherlands. Sustain Sci 14, 303–313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0607-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0607-9

Keywords

Navigation