Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 879–893 | Cite as

Power in participatory processes: reflections from multi-stakeholder workshops in the Horn of Africa

  • J. Michael Denney
  • Paul Michael Case
  • Alexander Metzger
  • Maria Ivanova
  • Araya Asfaw
Overview Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: Sustainability Science for Meeting Africa's Challenges

Abstract

The sustainability science literature views the participation of local stakeholders as a necessary element for both conducting transdisciplinary research and implementing sustainable development projects. However, there is very little critical reflection on how power dynamics between researchers and local stakeholders affect the success of participatory processes. This article draws on the critical tradition of political science and sociology to examine how power dynamics are inherent to, and should always be a concern during, participatory processes. This also applies for sustainability science research and the implementation of sustainable development projects, especially in developing contexts such as those of Africa. While local participation enhances the voices of local stakeholders, power dynamics between them and the researchers driving these processes can dampen local voices or elide critical pieces of information. Using evidence from participatory workshops in Djibouti and Kenya, we demonstrate that these power dynamics can unintentionally exclude critical knowledge and perspectives from the formal proceedings of participatory workshops, despite an express focus on stakeholder inclusion and participatory methods. Using Steven Lukes’ tripartite conception of power, we elicit how the workshop structure and the actions of researchers as the designers and facilitators of the workshop may have prevented the emergence of this critical information. The central argument is that reflecting on power will help researchers and practitioners identify the power dynamics inherent in the participatory processes so they can work to overcome them. Such self-reflection can strengthen sustainability science and practice in African and other contexts.

Keywords

Participation International development Power Critical theory Concept mapping 

References

  1. Adano WR, Dietz T, Witsenburg K, Zaal F (2012) Climate change, violent conflict and local institutions in Kenya’s drylands. J Peace Res 49(1):65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar J (2005) A survey about fuzzy cognitive maps papers (invited paper). Int J Comput Cogn 3(2):27–33Google Scholar
  3. Azzarello R (2016) Unnatural predators: Queer Theory meets environmental studies in Bram Stroker’s Dracula. In: Giffney N, Hird MJ (eds) Queering the non/human. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire, pp 137–157Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee SB (2003) Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Org Stud 24(1):143–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee SB (2011) Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Crit Soc 34(1):51–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manag 90(5):1692–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. Link Soc Ecol Syst Manag Pract Soc Mech Build Resil 1:13–20Google Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Folke C, Gadgil M (1995) Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. In: Perrings CA, Mäler KG, Folke C, Holling CS, Jansson BO (eds) Biodiversity conservation. Ecology, economy & environment, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (2000) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Brinkerhoff JM (2002) Partnership for international development: rhetoric or results? Lynne Rienner Publishers, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown K (2003) Three challenges for a real people-centered conservation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12(2):89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke MB, Miguel E, Satyanath S, Dykema J, Lobell DB (2009) Warming increases the risk of civil war in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(49):20670–20674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carley K, Palmquist M (1992) Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Soc Forces 70(3):36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. PNAS 100(14):8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers R (1983) Rural development: putting the last first. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Chambers R (1994) Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): analysis of experience. World Dev 22(9):1253–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chambers R (2005) Ideas for development. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Chambers R (2012) Revolutions in development inquiry. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Clegg SR, Courpasson D, Phillips N (2006) Power and organizations. SAGE Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Collier P (2008) The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Contu A, Girei E (2014) NGOs management and the value of “partnerships” for equality in international development: what’s in a name? Hum Relat 67(2):205–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooke B, Kothari U (2001) Participation: the new tyranny? Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Crewe E, Harrison E (1998) Whose development: an ethnography of aid. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Denier L, Scherr S, Shames S, Chatterton P, Hovani L, Stam N (2015) The little sustainable landscapes book. Global Canopy Programme, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Dijkzeul D, DeMars WE (eds) (2015) The NGO challenge for international relations theory. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Dowding K (2006) Three-dimensional power: a discussion of Steven Lukes’ power: a radical view. Polit Stud Rev 4:136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Easterly W (2006) The White Man’s burden: why the West’s efforts to Aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. The Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (2011) Participant observation and fieldnotes. In Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L (eds), Handbook of ethnography. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, pp 352–368Google Scholar
  29. Ennsa C, Bersagliob B, Kepec T (2014) Indigenous voices and the making of the post-2015 development agenda: the recurring tyranny of participation. Third World Q 35(3):358–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Foucault M (1978) The history of sexuality, vol I. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Freeman OE, Duguma LA, Minang PA (2015) Operationalizing the integrated landscape approach in practice. Ecol Soc.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07175-200124 Google Scholar
  33. Gasparatos A, Takeuchi K, Elmqvist T, Fukushi K, Nagao M, Swanepoel F, Swilling M, Trotter D, von Blottnitz H (2017) Sustainability science for meeting Africa’s challenges: setting the stage. Sustain Sci 12:635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gaventa J (2003) Power after Lukes: an overview of theories of power since Lukes and their application to development. Participation Group, Institute of Development Studies, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  35. Glicken J (2000) Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environ Sci Policy 3(6):305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gray S, Sundal M, Wiebusch B, Little MA, Leslie PW, Pike IL (2003) Cattle raiding, cultural survival, and adaptability of East African Pastoralists. Curr Anthropol 44(December):S3–S30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gray SA, Gray S, Cox LJ, Henly-Shepard S (2013) Mental modeler: a fuzzy-logic cognitive mapping modeling tool for adaptive environmental management. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 965–973.  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.399. Retrieved Dec 5 2014
  38. Gray SA, Gray SRJ, De Kok JL, Helfgott A, Dwyer BO, Jordan R, Nyaki A (2015) Using fuzzy cognitive mapping as a participatory approach to analyze change, preferred states, and perceived resilience of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 20(2):11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hara K, Kumazawa T, Kimura M, Tsuda K (2016) Participatory approach in vision setting: emerging initiatives in local municipalities in Japan. Sustain Sci 11(3):493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heras M, Tàbara JD (2014) Let’s play transformations! Performative methods for sustainability. Sustain Sci 9(3):379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hickey S, Mohan G (2005) Relocating participation within a radical politics of development. Dev Change 36(2):237–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hsiang SM, Meng KC (2014) Reconciling disagreement over climate-conflict results in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(6):2100–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kapoor I (2005) Participatory development, complicity and desire. Third World Q 26(8):1203–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Gru¨bler A, Huntley B, Ja¨ger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustain Sci Sci 292(5517):641–642Google Scholar
  45. Kealiikanakaoleohaililani K, Giardina CP (2016) Embracing the sacred: an indigenous framework for tomorrow’s sustainability science. Sustain Sci 11(1):57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kemp R, Martens P (2007) Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustain Sci Pract Policy 3(2):5–14Google Scholar
  47. Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(1):25–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lele SM (1991) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Dev 19(6):607–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leventon J, Fleskens L, Claringbould H, Schwilch G, Hessel R (2016) An applied methodology for stakeholder identification in transdisciplinary research. Sustain Sci 11(5):763–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levy DL, Reinecke J, Manning S (2015) The political dynamics of sustainable coffee: contested value regimes and the transformation of sustainability. J Manag Stud 53(3):1–46Google Scholar
  52. Liao C, Ruelle ML, Kassam KAS (2016) Indigenous ecological knowledge as the basis for adaptive environmental management: evidence from pastoralist communities in the Horn of Africa. J Environ Manag 182:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Livesey SM (2001) Eco-identity as discursive struggle: royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria. J Bus Commun 38(1):58–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lukes S (1974) Power: a radical view. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maathai W (2011) Challenge for Africa. Sustain Sci 6(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Metzger AE, Gray SA, Jetter AJ, Papageorgiou EI (2018) Typologies and tradeoffs in FCM studies: a guide to designing participatory research using fuzzy cognitive maps. In: McNall M (ed) Innovations in collaborative modeling. Michigan State University Press, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  57. Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mohan G, Stokke K (2000) Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism. Third World Q 21(2):247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moyo D (2009) Dead aid: why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Mwangi OG (2006) Kenya: conflict in the ‘Badlands’: the Turbi Massacre in Marsabit District. Rev Afr Polit Econ 33(107):81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nuijten M (2004) Peasant ‘participation’, rural property and the state in western Mexico. J Peasant Stud 31(2):181–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Reilly K (2008) Key concepts in ethnography. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Oba G (1992) Ecological factors in land use conflicts, land administration and food security in Turkana, Kenya. Pastoralist Development Network (ODI) Paper 33a. http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC59.htm. Retrieved 10 Aug 2015
  64. Polk M (2014) Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustain Sci 9(4):439–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ratner BD (2004) “Sustainability” as a dialogue of values: challenges to the sociology of development. Sociol Inq 74(1):50–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Redclift M (2005) Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age. Sustain Dev 13(4):212–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rodrik D (2001) The global governance of trade: as if development really mattered. John F Kennedy School of Government, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  68. Sachs J (2006) The end of poverty. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Schilling J, Akuno M, Scheffran J, Weinzierl T (2014) On raids and relations: climate change, pastoral conflict and adaptation in North-Western Kenya. In: Conflict-Sensitive Adaptation to Climate Change in Africa, edited by Alexander Carius and Dennis Tänzle, pp 241–265Google Scholar
  70. Smith N (2010) Uneven development: nature, capital, and the production of space. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  71. Sneddon C, Howarth RB, Norgaard RB (2006) Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecol Econ 57(2):253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Somekh B (2005) Action research: a methodology for change and development: a methodology for change and development. McGraw-Hill Education, UKGoogle Scholar
  73. Steelman T, Nichols EG, James A, Bradford L, Ebersöhn L, Scherman V, McHale MR (2015) Practicing the science of sustainability: the challenges of transdisciplinarity in a developing world context. Sustain Sci 10(4):581–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stylios CD, Groumpos PP (2004) Modeling complex systems using fuzzy cognitive maps. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 34(1):155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thornton PK, Jones PG, Owiyo T, Kruska R, Herrero M, Kristjanson P, Omolo A (2006) Mapping climate vulnerability and poverty in Africa. ILRI, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  76. van Donge JK (2011) Ethnography and participant observation. In: Desai V, Potter RB (eds) Doing development research. SAGE Publications, Ltd, London, pp 153–163Google Scholar
  77. Veisi H, Liaghati H, Vaninee HS (2014) Participatory assessment of the sustainability of livelihoods in the agroecosystem of Abesard, Iran. Sustain Sci 9(3):347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Waas T, Verbruggen A, Wright T (2010) University research for sustainable development: definition and characteristics explored. J Clean Prod 18(7):629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming GS, Janssen M, Lebel L (2002) Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation 6(1):1–14Google Scholar
  80. Watson A, Alessa L, Glaspell B (2003) The relationship between traditional ecological knowledge, evolving cultures, and wilderness protection in the Circumpolar North. Ecol Soc 8(1)Google Scholar
  81. Wheeler D, Sillanpa M (1998) Including the stakeholders: the business case. Long Range Plan 31(2):201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N (2014) Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustain Sci 9(4):483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. World Bank (2003) World development report 2003: sustainable development in a dynamic world–transforming institutions, growth, and quality of life. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5985. Retrieved 20 Sept 2013
  84. Ziker JP, Rasmussen J, Nolin DA (2016) Indigenous Siberians solve collective action problems through sharing and traditional knowledge. Sustain Sci 11(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Michael Denney
    • 1
  • Paul Michael Case
    • 1
  • Alexander Metzger
    • 1
  • Maria Ivanova
    • 1
  • Araya Asfaw
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA
  2. 2.Addis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations