Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainability science and the epistemic challenge: some matters philosophical and why we ought to come to know them better

  • Short Commentary
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While there would appear to be a general awareness and appreciation of the foundational significance of values to sustainability science, they, along with other philosophical dimensions associated with beliefs and assumptions, rarely seem to make the headlines. With reference to a seminal contribution on macroethical systems that was published in the initial edition of this journal, some of these important matters are explored in the context of worldviews, their nature and their significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Allenby B (2006) Macroethical systems and sustainability science. Sustain Sci 1:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawden RJ (2010) In sustainability ethics. In: Raffaelle R, Robison W, Selinger E (eds) Five questions. Automatic Press/VIP, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch L (2000) The eclipse of morality science: state and market. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1981) Systems thinking systems practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Dixon NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8059–8061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clover C (2016) Black wind, white snow: the rise of Russia’s New Nationalism. Yale University, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund-de Witt A (2013) Worldviews and their significance for the global sustainable development debate. Environmental Ethics 35:133–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert PG (2008) Transforming worldviews: an anthropological understanding of how people change. Baker Academic, Grand Rapids

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2014) This changes everything: capitalism vs the climate. Simon Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koltko-Rivera M (2004) The psychology of worldviews. Rev Gen Psychol 8:3–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard R (1994) Development Betrayed: the end of progress and a co-evolutionary revisioning of the future. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2004) The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36:614–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C (2015) The trajectory of the anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthropocene Rev 1:18–36

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Security Unit (2017) Human Security in Theory and Practice: an Overview of the Human Security Concept, http://www.un.org/humansecurity/sites/www.un.org.humansecurity/files/human_security_in_theory_and_practice_english.pdf, Accessed June 7, 2017

  • Yankelovich D (1991) Coming to Public Judgement making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse University, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Bawden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bawden, R., Allenby, B. Sustainability science and the epistemic challenge: some matters philosophical and why we ought to come to know them better. Sustain Sci 12, 901–905 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0480-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0480-y

Keywords

Navigation