Health Literacy, Processing Capacity, Illness Knowledge, and Actionable Memory for Medication Taking in Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Analysis

Abstract

Background

Patient knowledge about the purpose of medications is crucial to ensure safe and correct use, so it is an important index of adherence in patients with chronic illness.

Objective

We examined how health literacy and its components (processing capacity and knowledge about illness) influence memory for medication purposes.

Design

We conducted a cross-sectional study to examine memory for medication purposes in relation to health literacy, processing capacity, and illness knowledge among patients with diabetes in outpatient clinics.

Participants

Six hundred seventy-four adults who were diagnosed with type II diabetes mellitus, age 40 years or older, taking 5 or more current medications, native speakers of English, and with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.0 or more, were recruited to the study.

Main Measures

We included measures of processing capacity, illness knowledge, health literacy, and actionable memory for medication taking (memory for medication purpose).

Key Results

Results suggested an association between health literacy and both processing capacity and health knowledge, with some evidence that knowledge can compensate for limited processing capacity in order to maintain health literacy. Furthermore, health literacy was associated with memory for medication purposes, with processing capacity and health knowledge partly mediating this association. This pattern of results supports the process-knowledge model of health literacy.

Conclusions

Our findings establish the role of health literacy in medication taking, in relation to broader cognitive abilities and knowledge. Implications for improving the learning of medication purpose among diverse older adults with chronic illness are discussed.

Trial Registration

NIH trial registry number: NCT01296633

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

  1. 1.

    McPherson ML, Smith SW, Powers A, Zuckerman IH. Association between diabetes patients’ knowledge about medications and their blood glucose control. Res Soc Adm Pharm RSAP. 2008;4(1):37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Okuyan B, Sancar M, Izzettin FV. Assessment of medication knowledge and adherence among patients under oral chronic medication treatment in community pharmacy settings. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(2):209-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Abu Nab’a RJ, et al. Influence of patients’ disease knowledge and beliefs about medicines on medication adherence: findings from a cross-sectional survey among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Toren O, Kerzman H, Koren N, Baron-Epel O. Patients’ Knowledge Regarding Medication Therapy and the Association with Health Services Utilization. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;5(4):311-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Broadbent E, Donkin L, Stroh JC. Illness and Treatment Perceptions Are Associated With Adherence to Medications, Diet, and Exercise in Diabetic Patients. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(2):338-340. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1779

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Krauskopf K, Federman AD, Kale MS, et al. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Illness and Medication Beliefs are Associated with Medication Adherence. COPD. 2015;12(2):151-164. https://doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2014.922067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Morrow DG, Carver LM, Leirer VO, Tanke ED. Medication Schemas and Memory for Automated Telephone Messages. Hum Factors. 2000;42(4):523-540. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872000779698042

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Morrow DG, Leirer VO, Andrassy JM, Tanke ED, Stine-Morrow EAL. Medication Instruction Design: Younger and Older Adult Schemas for Taking Medication. Hum Factors. 1996;38(4):556-573. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872096778827305

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kuntz JL, Safford MM, Singh JA, et al. Patient-centered interventions to improve medication management and adherence: a qualitative review of research findings. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97(3):310-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Morrow DG, Leirer VO, Carver LM, Tanke ED. Older and younger adult memory for health appointment information: Implications for automated telephone messaging design. J Exp Psychol Appl. 1998;4(4):352-374. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.4.4.352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Persell SD, Heiman HL, Weingart SN, et al. Understanding of drug indications by ambulatory care patients. Am J Health-Syst Pharm AJHP Off J Am Soc Health-Syst Pharm. 2004;61(23):2523-2527. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/61.23.2523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Scheibehenne B, Wilke A, Todd PM. Expectations of clumpy resources influence predictions of sequential events. Evol Hum Behav. 2011;32(5):326-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000. http://www.health.gov/healthypeople/. Accessed 13 Sept 2020

  14. 14.

    Mosher HJ, Lund BC, Kripalani S, Kaboli PJ. Association of health literacy with medication knowledge, adherence, and adverse drug events among elderly veterans. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:241-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.712611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Al Sayah F, Majumdar SR, Williams B, Robertson S, Johnson JA. Health Literacy and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(3):444-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2241-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97-107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Du S, Zhou Y, Fu C, Wang Y, Du X, Xie R. Health literacy and health outcomes in hypertension: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Sci . Published online June 9, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.06.001

  18. 18.

    van der Heide I, Uiters E, Rademakers J, Struijs JN, Schuit AJ, Baan CA. Associations Among Health Literacy, Diabetes Knowledge, and Self-Management Behavior in Adults with Diabetes: Results of a Dutch Cross-Sectional Study. J Health Commun. 2014;19(sup2):115-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.936989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chin J, Morrow DG, Stine-Morrow EAL, Conner-Garcia T, Graumlich JF, Murray MD. The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures. J Health Commun. 2011;16(Suppl 3):222-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.604702

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chin J, Payne B, Gao X, et al. Memory and comprehension for health information among older adults: Distinguishing the effects of domain-general and domain-specific knowledge. Memory. 2015;23(4):577-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2014.912331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Levinthal BR, Morrow DG, Tu W, Wu J, Murray MD. Cognition and health literacy in patients with hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8):1172-1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0612-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Graumlich JF, Wang H, Madison A, et al. Effects of a Patient-Provider, Collaborative, Medication-Planning Tool: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Diabetes Res https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2129838

  23. 23.

    Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-Item Screener to Identify Cognitive Impairment Among Potential Subjects for Clinical Research Med Care. 2002;40(9):771-781. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fillenbaum GG. Multidimensional Functional Assessment of Older Adults: The Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures. Psychology Press. 1988.

  25. 25.

    Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25(6):391-395.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Salthouse TA. Mediation of Adult Age Differences in Cognition by Reductions in Working Memory and Speed of Processing. Psychol Sci. 1991;2(3):179-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00127.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Garcia AA, Villagomez ET, Brown SA, Kouzekanani K, Hanis CL. The Starr County Diabetes Education Study: Development of the Spanish-language diabetes knowledge questionnaire. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(1):16-21. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.1.16

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge. 2013.

  29. 29.

    Fritz MS, MacKinnon DP. Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(3):233-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Baltes PB. On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. Am Psychol. 1997;52(4):366-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.366

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Beier ME, Ackerman PL. Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge: promising results in a real-world learning environment. Psychol Aging. 2005;20(2):341-355. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ. Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 2006;31(4):437-448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chin J, Madison A, Gao X, et al. Cognition and Health Literacy in Older Adults’ Recall of Self-Care Information. The Gerontologist. 2017;57(2):261-268. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Duwe EA, Holloway BM, Chin J, Morrow DG. Illness experience and illness representation among older adults with hypertension. Health Educ J. 2018;77(4):412-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896917751553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Leventhal H, Safer MA, Panagis DM. The Impact of Communications on the Self-Regulation of Health Beliefs, Decisions, and Behavior. Health Educ Q. 1983;10(1):3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818301000101

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kintsch W. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge University Press. 1998.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Thembi Conner-Garcia, Kathryn Davis, Anna Madison, Stacey McKeever, and Darcie Moeller for their help in conducting the study. The data used in this paper were collected as part of the baseline of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01296633). The results from the RCT study are described in Graumlich et al. (2016).

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, 1R01NR011300.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessie Chin Ph. D..

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Disclaimer

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chin, J., Wang, H., Awwad, A.W. et al. Health Literacy, Processing Capacity, Illness Knowledge, and Actionable Memory for Medication Taking in Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Analysis. J GEN INTERN MED (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06472-z

Download citation

KEY WORDS

  • health literacy
  • memory for medication purpose
  • medication schemas
  • illness knowledge
  • diabetes