Incorporating PROMIS Symptom Measures into Primary Care Practice—a Randomized Clinical Trial
Symptoms account for more than 400 million clinic visits annually in the USA. The SPADE symptoms (sleep, pain, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue) are particularly prevalent and undertreated.
To assess the effectiveness of providing PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System) symptom scores to clinicians on symptom outcomes.
Randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2015 through May 2016 in general internal medicine and family practice clinics in an academic healthcare system.
Primary care patients who screened positive for at least one SPADE symptom.
After completing the PROMIS symptom measures electronically immediately prior to their visit, the 300 study participants were randomized to a feedback group in which their clinician received a visual display of symptom scores or a control group in which scores were not provided to clinicians.
The primary outcome was the 3-month change in composite SPADE score. Secondary outcomes were individual symptom scores, symptom documentation in the clinic note, symptom-specific clinician actions, and patient satisfaction.
Most patients (84%) had multiple clinically significant (T-score ≥ 55) SPADE symptoms. Both groups demonstrated moderate symptom improvement with a non-significant trend favoring the feedback compared to control group (between-group difference in composite T-score improvement, 1.1; P = 0.17). Symptoms present at baseline resolved at 3-month follow-up only one third of the time, and patients frequently still desired treatment. Except for pain, clinically significant symptoms were documented less than half the time. Neither symptom documentation, symptom-specific clinician actions, nor patient satisfaction differed between treatment arms. Predictors of greater symptom improvement included female sex, black race, fewer medical conditions, and receiving care in a family medicine clinic.
Simple feedback of symptom scores to primary care clinicians in the absence of additional systems support or incentives is not superior to usual care in improving symptom outcomes.
clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02383862.
KEY WORDSpatient-reported outcomes symptoms primary care feedback clinical trial
There are no contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship.
This work was supported by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Contract ME-1403-12043.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Part of this work was presented at the Health Measures User Conference, September 27, 2017, in Chicago, Illinois.
- 7.Schappert SM. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1991 summary. Adv Data. 1993(230):1–16.Google Scholar
- 45.Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1480–1501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar