Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 280–287 | Cite as

Long-Term Quality of Life Assessment After Successful Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy of Defects in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Quality of Life After EVT

  • Sameer A. Dhayat
  • Rosanna Schacht
  • Rudolf Mennigen
  • Daniel Palmes
  • Thomas Vogel
  • Thorsten Vowinkel
  • Norbert Senninger
  • Mike Georg LaukoetterEmail author
Original Article
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Accumulating evidence indicates that anastomotic leakages and perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract (uGIT) can be treated successfully with endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT). So far, no data is available regarding the long-term quality of life (QoL) after successful EVT of defects in the uGIT.

Methods

We present a prospective survey on long-term Qol of 52 patients treated by EVT for defects of the uGIT. Results are compared with 63 of 221 patients treated by esophagectomy without anastomotic insufficiency (w/o EVT) between 12/2011 and 12/2015. The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life-Index (GIQLI) score was determined by a 36-item questionnaire of 25 respondents with EVT and 50 respondents w/o EVT.

Results

The response rate was 78.95% (75/95) including 25 survey respondents who were treated with EVT for anastomotic insufficiency secondary to esophagectomy or gastrectomy (n = 19), iatrogenic esophageal perforation (n = 4), and Boerhaave syndrome (n = 2) and 50 respondents with complication-free esophagectomy w/o EVT. The median follow-up was 19 months for EVT patients and 21 months for patients w/o EVT. Except for “social function” (p = 0.009) in favor for patients w/o EVT, the median GIQLI score did not differ significantly between both study groups concerning the categories ‘symptoms’, ‘emotions’, ‘physical functions’, and ‘medical treatment’ resulting in a total median GIQLI score of 83 in EVT versus 96.5 in patients w/o EVT (p = 0.185). Spearman Rho analysis revealed that a high GIQLI score correlated with a low ASA score (p < 0.001), a benign pathology (p = 0.001), and a hospital stay less than 21 days (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

EVT in the uGIT is well tolerated by the patients and accompanied by a satisfactory long-term QoL.

Keywords

Negative-pressure wound therapy Upper gastrointestinal tract Anastomotic leakage Quality of life 

Abbreviations

BMI

Body mass index

EVT

Endoscopic vacuum therapy

GI

Gastrointestinal

GIQLI

Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index

r

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient

w/o EVT

Without endoscopic vacuum therapy

QoL

Quality of life

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank our study secretary Ms. Ulrike Thoben for her support and expert technical assistance.

Authors’ Contribution

SAD and MGL designed the study. All authors contributed substantially to the conception and acquisition of the study. All authors collected all data and SAD, RS, and MGL analyzed all data. Further, all authors performed critical revision for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical approval for postoperative QoL survey was obtained (Ethics committee, University Muenster, Az: 2016-687-f-S) and all patients provided written informed consent.

This analysis was approved by the local institutional review board and was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983.

Conflict of Interests

M.G. Laukoetter is a member of the expert panel of negative pressure wound therapy of the Paul Hartmann (AG) holding company. He received fees for invited speeches on endoscopic vacuum therapy. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

11605_2018_4038_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary table 1 Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index item scores of patients with endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) vs. without endoscopic vacuum therapy (w/o EVT). (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(1):3–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.018.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alanezi K, Urschel JD. Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;10(2):71–5.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biancari F, D'Andrea V, Paone R, Di Marco C, Savino G, Koivukangas V et al. Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):1051–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1951-7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lang H, Piso P, Stukenborg C, Raab R, Jahne J. Management and results of proximal anastomotic leaks in a series of 1114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26(2):168–71.  https://doi.org/10.1053/ejso.1999.0764.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ikeguchi M, Oka S, Gomyo Y, Tsujitani S, Maeta M, Kaibara N. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48(41):1517–20.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laukoetter MG, Mennigen R, Neumann PA, Dhayat S, Horst G, Palmes D et al. Successful closure of defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract by endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT): a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(6):2687–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5265-3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schorsch T, Muller C, Loske G. Endoscopic vacuum therapy of anastomotic leakage and iatrogenic perforation in the esophagus. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):2040–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2707-4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loske G, Muller C. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(3 Pt 1):601–2; author reply 2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.058.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wedemeyer J, Schneider A, Manns MP, Jackobs S. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(4):708–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.064.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuehn F, Schiffmann L, Rau BM, Klar E. Surgical endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage and perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(11):2145–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2014-3.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bludau M, Holscher AH, Herbold T, Leers JM, Gutschow C, Fuchs H et al. Management of upper intestinal leaks using an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (E-VAC). Surg Endosc. 2014;28(3):896–901.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3244-5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wedemeyer J, Brangewitz M, Kubicka S, Jackobs S, Winkler M, Neipp M et al. Management of major postsurgical gastroesophageal intrathoracic leaks with an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(2):382–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weidenhagen R, Hartl WH, Gruetzner KU, Eichhorn ME, Spelsberg F, Jauch KW. Anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection: new treatment options by endoluminal vacuum therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(5):1674–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.07.007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahrens M, Schulte T, Egberts J, Schafmayer C, Hampe J, Fritscher-Ravens A et al. Drainage of esophageal leakage using endoscopic vacuum therapy: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2010;42(9):693–8.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255688.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heits N, Stapel L, Reichert B, Schafmayer C, Schniewind B, Becker T et al. Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy in esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(3):1029–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.014.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bludau M, Fuchs HF, Herbold T, Maus MKH, Alakus H, Popp F et al. Results of endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure device for treatment of upper GI leaks. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(4):1906–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5883-4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuehn F, Schiffmann L, Janisch F, Schwandner F, Alsfasser G, Gock M et al. Surgical Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Defects of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(2):237–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-3044-4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mennigen R, Harting C, Lindner K, Vowinkel T, Rijcken E, Palmes D et al. Comparison of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy Versus Stent for Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(7):1229–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2847-7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brangewitz M, Voigtlander T, Helfritz FA, Lankisch TO, Winkler M, Klempnauer J et al. Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45(6):433–8.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1326435.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schniewind B, Schafmayer C, Voehrs G, Egberts J, von Schoenfels W, Rose T et al. Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3883–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2998-0.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuehn F, Loske G, Schiffmann L, Gock M, Klar E. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for various defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3449–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5404-x.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E et al. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82(2):216–22.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling GE, D'Journo XB et al. International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):286–94.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001098.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schaheen L, Blackmon SH, Nason KS. Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2014;208(4):536–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.05.011.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mennigen R, Senninger N, Laukoetter MG. Novel treatment options for perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract: endoscopic vacuum therapy and over-the-scope clips. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(24):7767–76.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7767.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paspatis GA, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M, Meisner S, Repici A, Saunders BP et al. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2014;46(8):693–711.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377531.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fuchs H, Holscher AH, Leers J, Bludau M, Brinkmann S, Schroder W et al. Long-term quality of life after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: extended gastrectomy or transthoracic esophagectomy? Gastric Cancer. 2016;19(1):312–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0466-3.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dasari BV, Neely D, Kennedy A, Spence G, Rice P, Mackle E et al. The role of esophageal stents in the management of esophageal anastomotic leaks and benign esophageal perforations. Ann Surg. 2014;259(5):852–60.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000564.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Boeckel PG, Sijbring A, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD. Systematic review: temporary stent placement for benign rupture or anastomotic leak of the oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33(12):1292–301.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04663.x.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General and Visceral SurgeryUniversity Hospital MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations