Comparison of Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Ivor-Lewis, Mckeown, or Sweet Esophagectomy
- 241 Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare the long-term quality of life (QoL) in patients after Sweet, Ivor-Lewis, or Mckeown esophagectomy.
Esophageal cancer patients after Sweet, Ivor-Lewis, or Mckeown esophagectomy from 2010 to 2012 were included. QoL was assessed according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer general questionnaire: QLQ-C30 and esophagus-specific questionnaire: QLQ-OES18.
A total of 126 qualified patients who have been alive for more than 3 years without tumor recurrence were divided into three groups: the Sweet group (n = 40), Ivor-Lewis group (n = 38), and Mckeown group (n = 48). Among these three groups, the QLQ-C30 mean scores of global health status, functional and symptom scales, and general QoL were similar. The symptom scales of QLQ-OSE18 showed that patients who had a Mckeown operation experienced more problem of eating (P = 0.029), choking when swallowing (P = 0.010) and coughing (P = 0.016), while patients undergoing Sweet operation complained more symptom of reflux (P = 0.003) and pain (P = 0.000).
All three types of esophagectomy provided a generally good long-term QoL. However, patients in Sweet and Mckeown group tend to suffer from a higher symptomatic burden as compared to Ivor-Lewis approach.
KeywordsEsophageal cancer Quality of life (QoL) QLQ-C30 QLQ-OES18 Esophagectomy
(I) Conception and design: Long-Qi Chen, Yu-Shang Yang, and Yong Yuan;
(II) Administrative support: Wei-Peng Hu and Yu-Shang Yang;
(III) Provision of study materials or patients: Qi-Xin Shang and Yu-Shang Yang;
(IV) Collection and assembly of data: Yu-Shang Yang, Xiao-Ying Wu, and Qi-Xin Shang;
(V) Data analysis and interpretation: Qi-Xin Shang, Wei-Peng Hu, and Yong Yuan;
(VI) Manuscript writing: All authors;
(VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 16.Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Grønvold M, Curran D, and Bottomley A. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition). 2001;Google Scholar
- 19.Scott NW, Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values manual. 2008;Google Scholar
- 23.Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, Mangum JH, Pappas TN, Harpole DH, Jr., et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 1170–6; discussion 1170–6.Google Scholar
- 24.Raymond DP, Seder CW, Wright CD, Magee MJ, Kosinski AS, Cassivi SD, et al. Predictors of Major Morbidity or Mortality After Resection for Esophageal Cancer: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Risk Adjustment Model. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102: 207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Pennathur A LR, Villa Sanchez M, Schuchert MJ, Awais O, Ward J, Gooding WE, Landreneau RJ, Dhupar R, Sarkaria I, Christie NA, Luketich JD. Prospective Study of Quality of Life after Esophagectomy with a Focus on Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. American Association for Thoracic Surgery Annual Meeting 2018; San Diego, CA. April 2018Google Scholar