Advertisement

Japanese Journal of Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 407–413 | Cite as

Techniques of adrenal venous sampling in patients with inferior vena cava or renal vein anomalies

  • Kenji Endo
  • Satoru Morita
  • Shingo Suzaki
  • Hiroshi Yamazaki
  • Yu Nishina
  • Shuji Sakai
Technical Note
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To review the techniques and technical success rate of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) or renal vein anomalies.

Materials and methods

The techniques and success rate of AVS in 15 patients with anomalies [8 with double IVC (dIVC), 3 with left IVC (ltIVC), 2 with retroaortic left renal vein (LRV), and 2 with circumaortic LRV] underwent AVS was retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Among 11 patients with IVC anomalies, the success rates for sampling the right and left adrenal veins (RAV and LAV) were 81.8 and 90.9%, respectively. In dIVC, the LAV was selected using the following four methods: approaching through the right IVC from the right femoral vein, flipping the LAV catheter tip in the LRV (n = 4) or the interiliac-communicating vein (n = 1), or through the ltIVC from the right (n = 1) or left (n = 2) femoral vein. Among the four patients with LRV anomalies, the success rate was 100% for each adrenal vein.

Conclusion

AVS can be successfully performed in patients with anomalies. The key to technical success is understanding the venous anatomy based on pre-procedural CT images and choosing appropriate methods.

Keywords

Venous anomalies Adrenal venous sampling AVS Interventional radiology Primary aldosteronism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We have no acknowledgement.

Funding

We have received no Grants related to this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This retrospective, single-institution study was approved by the institutional review board of our facility.

Informed consent

Written informed consent for the inclusion of individual patient data in the analysis was waived because of the retrospective nature of the investigation. All patients gave their consent for the AVS procedure.

References

  1. 1.
    Nishikawa T, Omura M, Satoh F, Shibata H, Takahashi K, Tamura N, Task Force Committee on Primary Aldosteronism, The Japan Endocrine Society, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism—the Japan Endocrine Society 2009. Endocr J. 2011;58(9):711–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Funder JW, Carey RM, Fardella C, Gomez-Sanchez CE, Mantero F, Stowasser M, et al. Case detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(9):3266–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rossi GP, Auchus RJ, Brown M, Lenders JWM, Naruse M, Plouin PF, et al. An expert consensus statement on use of adrenal vein sampling for the subtyping of primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2014;63(1):151–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morita S, Yamazaki H, Sonoyama Y, Nishina Y, Ichihara A, Sakai S. Successful adrenal venous sampling by non-experts with reference to CT images. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(7):1001–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Satani N, Ota H, Seiji K, Morimoto R, Kudo M, Iwakura Y, et al. Intra-adrenal aldosterone secretion: segmental adrenal venous sampling for localization. Radiology. 2016;278(1):265–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakamoto A, Urushida T, Sakakibara T, Sano M, Suwa K, Saitoh T, et al. Accidental entrapment of electrical mapping catheter by Chiari’s network in right atrium during catheter ablation procedure. Case Rep Cardiol. 2016;2016:1302473.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takahashi K, Akabane M, Nishimatsu H, Suzuki H, Takeshita M, Matsui H, et al. Chiari network: a potential pitfall in adrenal venous sampling. Folia Endocrinol Jpn. 2007;83(1):162.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morita S, Higuchi M, Saito N, Mitsuhashi N. Pelvic venous variations in patients with congenital inferior vena cava anomalies: classification with computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2007;48(9):974–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bass JE, Redwine MD, Kramer LA, Huynh PT, Harris JH. Spectrum of congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: cross-sectional imaging findings. Radiographics. 2000;20:639–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kadir Saadoon. Loop catheter technique: a simple, rapid method for left adrenal vein catheterization. AJR. 1980;134:31–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsuura T, Takase K, Ota H, Yamada T, Sato A, Satoh F, et al. Radiologic anatomy of the right adrenal vein: preliminary experience with MDCT. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):402–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Omura K, Ota H, Takahashi Y, Matsuura T, Seiji K, Arai Y, et al. Anatomical variations of the right adrenal vein: concordance between multidetector computed tomography and catheter venography. Hypertension. 2017;69(3):428–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morita S, Endo K, Suzaki S, Ishizaki U, Yamazaki H, Nishina Y, et al. Reduction of radiation exposure using dynamic trace digital angiography and spot fluoroscopy during adrenal venous sampling. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(5):697–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Radiological Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenji Endo
    • 1
  • Satoru Morita
    • 1
  • Shingo Suzaki
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Yamazaki
    • 1
  • Yu Nishina
    • 1
  • Shuji Sakai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine (Radiology)Tokyo Women’s Medical University HospitalTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations