Japanese Journal of Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 273–281 | Cite as

Global and Japanese regional variations in radiologist potential workload for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations

  • Kanako K. Kumamaru
  • Akihiro Machitori
  • Ritsuko Koba
  • Shinpei Ijichi
  • Yasuo Nakajima
  • Shigeki Aoki
Original Article
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the global variation in radiologist potential workload for CT and MRI examinations, and the regional variation in potential workload and extent of radiologists’ involvement in CT and MRI examinations in Japan.

Methods

“Radiologist potential workload” was defined as the annual number of CT plus MRI examinations divided by the total number of diagnostic radiologists. The extent of radiologists’ involvement was measured as the proportion of CT and MRI examinations to which “Added-fees for Radiological Managements on Imaging-studies (ARMIs)” were applied among eligible examinations. Maximum variation was computed as the ratio of the highest-to-lowest values among the countries or Japanese prefectures.

Results

The radiologist potential workload in Japan was 2.78–4.17 times higher than those in other countries. A maximum prefecture-to-prefecture variation was 3.88. The average percentage of CT plus MRI examinations with ARMI applied was 43.3%, with a maximum prefecture-to-prefecture variation of 3.97. Prefectures with more radiologists tended to have a higher extent of radiologists’ involvement.

Conclusions

Japan had a far greater radiologist potential workload compared with other countries, with a large regional variation among prefectures. Prefectures with more radiologists tended to have a higher extent of radiologists’ involvement in CT and MRI examinations.

Keywords

Computed tomography Magnetic resonance imaging Radiologist Workload 

Abbreviations and acronyms

CT

Computed tomography

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

NDB

National database

OECD

Organisation for economic co-operation and development

ARMI

Added-fee for Radiological Managements on Imaging-studies

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Ms. Koba and Mr. Ijichi are employees of GE healthcare, Japan. All data were entirely under the control of the corresponding author and the roles of Ms. Koba and Mr. Ijichi were the technical support for the analysis and drawing figures. The other authors have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was exempt from Institutional Review Board approval at the institution where the analyses were performed, because only aggregated anonymous data were used.

References

  1. 1.
    Kumamaru KK, Arai T, Morita H, Sekine T, Takamura K, Takase S, et al. Overestimation of pretest probability of coronary artery disease by Duke clinical score in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography in a Japanese population. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:198–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumamaru KK, Kondo T, Kumamaru H, Amanuma M, George E, Rybicki FJ. Repeat coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with a prior scan excluding significant stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:788–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP, Bosma J, Casarella WJ, Erickson BA, et al. Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology. 2010;257:240–5.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao VM, Levin DC. The overuse of diagnostic imaging and the choosing wisely initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:574–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Granovetter M. CTPA use reignites debate on overdiagnosis. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumamaru KK, Murayama S, Yamashita Y, Nojo T, Watanabe Y, Goto M, et al. Appropriate imaging utilization in Japan: a survey of accredited radiology training hospitals. Jpn J Radiol. 2017;35(11):648–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    OECD Health Statistics 2016—OECD. [cited 2017 Apr 4]. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm.
  8. 8.
    Nishie A, Kakihara D, Nojo T, Nakamura K, Kuribayashi S, Kadoya M, et al. Current radiologist workload and the shortages in Japan: how many full-time radiologists are required? Jpn J Radiol. 2015;33(5):266–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakajima Y, Yamada K, Imamura K, Kobayashi K. Radiologist supply and workload: International comparison—Working group of Japanese College of Radiology. Radiat Med. 2008;26(8):455–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumamaru KK, Hunsaker AR, Kumamaru H, George E, Bedayat A, Rybicki FJ. Correlation between early direct communication of positive CT pulmonary angiography findings and improved clinical outcomes. Chest. 2013;144:1546–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumamaru KK, Kogure Y, Suzuki M, Hori M, Nakanishi A, Kamagata K, et al. A strategy to optimize radiation exposure for non-contrast head CT: comparison with the Japanese diagnostic reference levels. Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34(6):451–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Japanese National Database Open data 2014. [cited 2017 Apr 4]. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000139390.html.
  13. 13.
    Japanese National Database Open data 2015. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000177221.html.
  14. 14.
    The expert committee on research use of claims data. Report on the third party use of health insurance claims and health check data. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/2r9852000002s0h8-att/2r9852000002s0li.pdf.
  15. 15.
    Kumamaru KK, Sano Y, Kumamaru H, Hori M, Takamura T, Irie R, et al. Radiologist involvement is associated with reduced use of MRI in the acute period of low back pain in a non-elderly population. Eur Radiol. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5086-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    des comptes C. L’imagerie médicale, communication à la commission des affaires sociales du Sénat. [cited 2017 Oct 20]. https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/files/EzPublish/20160511-imagerie-medicale.pdf.
  19. 19.
    Europe’s looming radiology capacity challenge: a comparative study. 2016. [cited 2017 Oct 20]. https://www.telemedicineclinic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Europes_looming_radiology_capacity_challenge-A_comparitive_study.pdf.
  20. 20.
    Agenas - Agenzia Nazionale per i servizi sanitari Regionali. [cited 2017 Oct 20]. http://www.agenas.it/contenuto-inglese.
  21. 21.
    보건의료빅데이터개방시스템 [Internet]. [cited 2017 Oct 20]. http://opendata.hira.or.kr/home.do#none.
  22. 22.
    Clinical radiology UK workforce census 2015 report. 2016. [cited 2017 Oct 20]. www.rcr.ac.uk.
  23. 23.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Hughes DR, Duszak R Jr. The US radiologist workforce: an analysis of temporal and geographic variation by using large national datasets. Radiology. 2015;279(1):175–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsumoto M, Koike S, Kashima S, Awai K, Ojima T. Geographic distribution of radiologists and utilization of teleradiology in Japan: a longitudinal analysis based on national census data. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare. Survey of Doctors, Dentists, and Pharmacists. 2014. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/list/33-20.html.
  26. 26.
    Matsumoto M, Koike S, Kashima S, Awai K. Geographic distribution of CT, MRI and PET devices in Japan: a longitudinal analysis based on national census data. PLoS One. 2015;10(5): e0126036.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126036 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schwartz WB, Newhouse JP, Bennett BW, Williams AP. The changing geographic distribution of board-certified physicians. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:1032–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patel ND, Broderick DF, Burns J, Deshmukh TK, Fries IB, Harvey HB, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria low back pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:1069–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, Shekelle P, Guidelines C. Clinical guideline diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:181–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    The Japanese Orthopaedic Association/The Japanese Society for the Study of Low Back Pain”. Guidelien for low back pain 2012. http://minds4.jcqhc.or.jp/minds/LBP/04_Ch3_LowBackPain.pdf.
  31. 31.
    Japan Society of Ningen Dock. Current status of advanced medical checkups in Japan: 2015. http://www.ningen-dock.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2ebf31e708cb165bd2c0b68fae972994.pdf.
  32. 32.
    Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Hiramatsu K, Ishikawa T, Suzuki S, Takashima T, et al. Current status of angiography and interventional radiology in Japan: survey results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:299–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Radiological Society 2018
corrected publication March 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kanako K. Kumamaru
    • 1
  • Akihiro Machitori
    • 2
  • Ritsuko Koba
    • 3
    • 4
  • Shinpei Ijichi
    • 4
  • Yasuo Nakajima
    • 3
  • Shigeki Aoki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, School of MedicineJuntendo UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine, Kohnodai HospitalChibaJapan
  3. 3.Department of RadiologySt. Marianna University School of MedicineKawasakiJapan
  4. 4.GE Healthcare Japan CorporationTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations