Skip to main content
Log in

Investigations into solar flare effects using wavelet-based local intermittency measure

  • Research Article - Atmospheric & Space Sciences
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study analyzes the efficiency of local intermittency measure based on wavelet transforms in identifying solar flare effects on magnetograms. If we observe the flare-time features in geomagnetic components, most often, disturbances associated with other solar phenomena will enhance or mask the solar flare signatures. Similarly, diurnal and high-latitude geomagnetic variabilities will suppress solar flare effects on magnetograms. The measurements of amplitudes taken directly from temporal variations of weak geomagnetic components have certain limitations regarding the identification of the proper base and peak values from which the deviation due to solar flare has to be measured. In such situations, local intermittency measure based on cross-wavelet analysis can be employed which could remarkably identify the flare effects, even if the signatures are weak or masked by other disturbance effects. The present study shows that local intermittency measure based on wavelet analysis could act as an alternate quantification technique for analyzing solar flare effects on geomagnetic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruno R, Bavassano B, Pietropaolo E, Carbone V, Veltri P (1999) Effects of intermittency on interplanetary velocity and magnetic field fluctuations anisotropy. Geophys Res Lett 26(20):3185–3188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington RC (1859) Description of a singular appearance seen in the Sun on September 1. Mon Not R Astron Soc 20:13–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consolini G, De Michelis P (2005) Local intermittency measure analysis of AE index: the directly driven and unloading component. Geophys Res Lett 32:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Michelis P, Tozzi R (2005) A Local Intermittency Measure (LIM) approach to the detection of geomagnetic jerks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 235:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dmitriev AV, Yeh HC (2008) Geomagnetic signatures of sudden ionospheric disturbances during extreme solar radiation events. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 70:1971–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farge M (1992) Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 24:395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farge M, Holschneider M, Colonna JF (1990) Wavelet analysis of coherent structures in two-dimensional turbulent flows in Topological Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez de Castro G, Simões PJA, Raulin JP, Guimarães OM (2016) Analysis of intermittency in submillimeter radio and hard X-Ray data during the impulsive phase of a solar flare. Sol Phys 291:2003–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson R (1860) On a curious appearance seen in the Sun. Mon Not R Soc 20:15–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács P, Carbone V, Vörös Z (2001) Wavelet-based filtering of intermittent events from geomagnetic time-series. Planet Space Sci 49:1219–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JY, Chiu CS, Lin CH (1996) The solar flare radiation responsible for sudden frequency deviation and geomagnetic fluctuation. J Geophys Res 101:10855–10862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallat S (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meignen S, Oberlin T, McLaughlin S (2012) Multicomponent signal denoising with synchrosqueezing. In: 2012 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP 2012), pp 660–663

  • Meneveau C (1991) Analysis of turbulence in the orthonormal wavelet representation. J Fluid Mech 232:469–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer Y (1992) Wavelets and operators. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meza A, Van Zele MA, Rovira M (2009) Solar flare effect on the geomagnetic field and ionosphere. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 71:1322–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata T (1966) Solar flare effect on the geomagnetic field. J Geomagn Geoelectr 18:197–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohshio M, Fukushima N, Nagata T (1967) Solar flare effects on geomagnetic field. Rep Ionos Space Res Jpn 21:77–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Okeke FN, Okpala KC (2005) Geomagnetic solar flare effect in H, Y, and Z fields in the Northern Hemisphere. NJSR 1:39–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi RG (1962) Longitudinal variation in the equatorial electrojet. J Atmos Terr Phys 24:1031–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi RG (2001) Electromagnetic induction due to solar flares at equatorial stations. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 63:599–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi RG, Chandra H, Yumoto K (2013) Unique examples of solar flare effects in geomagnetic H field during partial counter electrojet along CPMN longitude sector. Earth Planets Space 65:1027–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond AD, Venkateswaran SV (1971) Geomagnetic crochets and associated ionospheric current systems. Radio Sci 6:139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandberg-Hanssen E, Emslie AG (1988) The physics of solar flares. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugonabo OJ, Okeke FN, Ugwu BI (2016) Solar flare effects (SFE) on geomagnetic fields across latitudes. Int J Phys Sci 11:112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Sabben D (1961) Ionospheric current systems of ten IGY-solar flare effects. J Atmos Terr Phys 22:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venugopal V, Roux SG, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Arneodo A (2006) Revisiting multifractality of high-resolution temporal rainfall using a wavelet-based formalism. Water Resour Res 42(6):W06D14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volland H, Taubenheim J (1958) On the ionospheric current system of the geomagnetic solar flare effect (SFE). J Atmos Terr Phys 12:258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) for providing GOES X-ray flux archived at the NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) (http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/goes-x-ray-flux). The authors are also thankful to INTERMAGNET for providing 1-min data of geomagnetic components (www.intermagnet.org). One of the authors SG acknowledges a Junior Research Fellowship (Ac.EVI(4)/17465/JRF/2017) from the University of Kerala, Trivandrum.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. R. Prince.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gopinath, S., Prince, P.R. Investigations into solar flare effects using wavelet-based local intermittency measure. Acta Geophys. 67, 687–701 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00257-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00257-7

Keywords

Navigation