Acta Geophysica

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 267–282 | Cite as

Three-dimensional discrete element method simulation of core disking

  • Shunchuan Wu
  • Haoyan Wu
  • John Kemeny
Research Article - Solid Earth Sciences


The phenomenon of core disking is commonly seen in deep drilling of highly stressed regions in the Earth’s crust. Given its close relationship with the in situ stress state, the presence and features of core disking can be used to interpret the stresses when traditional in situ stress measuring techniques are not available. The core disking process was simulated in this paper using the three-dimensional discrete element method software PFC3D (particle flow code). In particular, PFC3D is used to examine the evolution of fracture initiation, propagation and coalescence associated with core disking under various stress states. In this paper, four unresolved problems concerning core disking are investigated with a series of numerical simulations. These simulations also provide some verification of existing results by other researchers: (1) Core disking occurs when the maximum principal stress is about 6.5 times the tensile strength. (2) For most stress situations, core disking occurs from the outer surface, except for the thrust faulting stress regime, where the fractures were found to initiate from the inner part. (3) The anisotropy of the two horizontal principal stresses has an effect on the core disking morphology. (4) The thickness of core disk has a positive relationship with radial stress and a negative relationship with axial stresses.


Core disking Discrete element method Numerical simulation Axial stress Radial stress 



The support received from Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of China (51774020) and Beijing Training Project for the Leading Talent in S & T (Z151100000315014) is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Bahrani N, Valley B, Kaiser PK (2015) Numerical simulation of drilling-induced core damage and its influence on mechanical properties of rocks under unconfined condition. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:40–50. Google Scholar
  2. Bankwitz PBE (1997) Fractographic features on joints in KTB drill cores as indicators of the contemporary stress orientation. Geol Rundsch 86:34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chenghu W (2014) Brief review and outlook of main estimate and measurement methods for in situ stresses in rock mass. Geol Rev 60(5):971–995Google Scholar
  4. Corthésy R, Leite MH (2008) A strain-softening numerical model of core discing and damage. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:329–350. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford BR, Smart BGD, Main IG, Liakopoulou-Morris F (1995) Strength characteristics and shear acoustic anisotropy of rock core subjected to true triaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 32:189–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Ge´otechnique 29:47–65.
  7. Dyke CG (1989) Core discing: its potential as an indicator of principal in situ stress directions. Rock Gt. Depth 2:1057–1064Google Scholar
  8. Flottmann T, Campagna DJ, Hillis R, Warner D (2004) Horizontal microfractures and core discing in sandstone reservoirs, Coopers Basin, Australia. PESA’s East Aust Basins Symp 2:689–694Google Scholar
  9. Hast N (1958) The measurement of rock pressure in mines. Norstedt, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  10. Hast N (1979) Limits of stress measurements in the earth’s crust. Rock Mech 150:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holt RM, Brignoli M, Kenter CJ (2000) Core quality: quantification of coring-induced rock alteration. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:889–907. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holt RM, Pestman BJ, Kenter CJ (2001) Use of a discrete particle model to assess feasibility of core based stress determination. In: Rock mechanics in the national interest, pp 1361–1366Google Scholar
  13. Hongwei Z, Hai R, Jun H et al (2014) Study on rock core discing mechanism based on stress and energy principle. Chin J Appl Mech 31(4):512–517Google Scholar
  14. Hou F, Jia Y (1984) Stress analysis on disced rock cores. Chin J Geotech Eng 6(5):48–58Google Scholar
  15. Huang H, Fan P, Li J et al (2016) A theoretical explanation for rock core disking in triaxial unloading test by considering local tensile stress. Acta Geophys 64:1430–1445. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ishida T, Saito T (1989) A study on core discing with a center hole. Shigen-to-Sozai 105:603–608. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ishida T, Saito T (1995) Observation of core discing and in situ stress measurements; Stress criteria causing core discing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 28:167–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Itasca Consulting Group I (2015) PFC—particle flow code in 2 and 3 dimensions, Version 5.0Google Scholar
  19. Jaeger JC, Coox NGW (1963) Pinching-off and disking of rocks. J Geophys Res 68(6):1759–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katsuhiko S et al (1978) A study on core discing of rock. J Min Met Inst Jpn 94:797–803Google Scholar
  21. Kaga N, Matsuki K, Sakaguchi K (2003) The in situ stress states associated with core discing estimated by analysis of principal tensile stress. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:653–665. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kulander BR, Dean SL, Ward BJ (1990) Fractured core analysis-induced fractures in core. American Association of Petroleum GeologistsGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Y (1997) Drilling induced core damage and their relationship to crustal in situ stress states and rock properties. University of Alberta, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  24. Li Y, Schmitt DR (1997a) Effects of poisson’s ratio and core stub length on bottomhole stress concentrations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:761–773. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Y, Schmitt DR (1997b) Well-bore bottom stress concentration and induced core fractures. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 81(1997):1909–1925. Google Scholar
  26. Li Y, Schmitt DR (1998) Drilling-induced core fractures and in situ stress. J Geophys Res 103:5225–5239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim SS (2013) In-situ stress magnitude and core disking. University of Albert, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  28. Lim SS, Martin CD (2010) Core disking and its relationship with stress magnitude for Lac du Bonnet granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:254–264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsuki K, Hongo K, Sakaguchi K (1997a) A tensile principal stress analysis for estimating three-dimensional in situ stressed from core discing. In: Rock stress, Rotterdam, Balkema, pp 343–348Google Scholar
  30. Matsuki K, Hongo K, Sakaguchi K (1997b) A tensile principal stress analysis for estimating three-dimensional in situ stresses from core discing. In: Rock Stress, Rotterdam, Balkema, pp 343–348Google Scholar
  31. Matsuki K, Kaga N, Yokoyama T, Tsuda N (2003) Determination of three-dimensional directions of in situ stress from core discing. In: Rock stress: proceedings of the third internaional symposium on rock stress, pp 237–243Google Scholar
  32. Matsuki K, Kaga N, Yokoyama T, Tsuda N (2004) Determination of three dimensional in situ stress from core discing based on analysis of principal tensile stress. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:1167–1190. Google Scholar
  33. McGarr A, Gay NC (1978) State of stress in the earth’s crust. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 6:405–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Obara Y, Kang SS, Seguchi T, Sato A (1998) a criterion of hollow core disking initiation. Shigen to Sozai 114:875–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Obert L, Stephenson DE (1965) Stress conditions under which core discing occurs. Soc Min Eng AIME Trans 232:227–235Google Scholar
  36. Shang Y, Sun Q (1991) Rock core disking mechanism analysis of TianHuangCheng power stationGoogle Scholar
  37. Stacey TR (1982) Contribution to the mechanism of core discing. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 82:269–276Google Scholar
  38. Takehiro O (2001) Core disking and Rockburst in soft tuffaceous rock masses at Iwate tunnel tuffaceous. QR RTRI 42:130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tianhui M, Long W, Tao X, Qun YU (2016) Mechanism and stress analysis of rock core discing. J Northeastern Univ 37(10):1491–1495Google Scholar
  40. Vallejos JA, Salinas JM, Delonca A, Mas Ivars D (2016) Calibration and verification of two bonded-particle models for simulation of intact rock behavior. Int J Geomech 17:6016030. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu W, Li G, Wang K (1985) Analyses of disking phenomenon and stress field in the region of an underground powerhouse. Rock Mech Rock Eng 18:1–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences & Polish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Ministry for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal MinesUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  3. 3.Kunming University of Science and TechnologyKunmingChina
  4. 4.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations