Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes: Complete versus Incomplete Placenta Previa in Mid-pregnancy

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This prospective study was conducted to compare risk factors and pregnancy outcomes between women with complete placenta previa and those with incomplete placenta previa diagnosed in mid-pregnancy. The study was carried out from April 2014 to December 2015, during which 70 patients with complete previa and 113 with incomplete previa between 20+0 weeks and 25+6 weeks of gestation were included. Maternal demographics and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. Comparisons between categorical variables were tested by chi-squared test and those between continuous variables by Student t test. Resolution of previa occurred in 87.43% of the studied women. The mean gestational age at resolution was 32.1±4.4 weeks. Incidence of maternal age ≥35 years and incidence of prior uterine operation ≥3 were high in women with complete previa (28.6% vs 8.8%, P=0.003; 28.6% vs. 8.8%, P=0.003). Resolution of previa occurred less often in complete previa group (74.3% vs. 95.6%, P=0.001). Women with complete previa admitted earlier (37.3±2.0 weeks 38.1±1.4 weeks, P=0.011) and delivered earlier (37.7±1.2 weeks vs. 38.3±1.4 weeks, P=0.025). Maternal age ≥35 years and prior uterine operation ≥3 increase the risk of complete previa in mid-pregnancy. Placenta previa is more likely to persist in women with complete previa than those with incomplete previa diagnosed in midpregnancy. What is more, women with complete previa in mid-pregnancy delivers earlier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wexler P, Gottesfeld KR. Early diagnosis of placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol, 1979, 54(2):231–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker RH, Vonk R, Mende BC, et al. The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 17(6):496–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuzovic L. Complete versus incomplete placenta previa and obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2006, 93(2):110–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dola C, Garite TJ, Dowling DD, et al Placenta previa: does its type affect pregnancy outcome? Am J Perinatol, 2003, 20(7):353–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorodeski IG, Bahari CM. The effect of placenta previa localization upon maternal and fetal-neonatal outcome. J Perinat Med, 1987, 15(2):169–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan J. Placenta praevia: report on a series of 538 cases (1938–1962). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, 1965, 72(5):700–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crenshaw С Jr, Jones DE, Parker RT, et al. Placenta previa: a survey of twenty years experience with improved perinatal survival by expectant therapy and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1973, 28(7):461–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cotton DB, Read JA, Paul RH, et al. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1980, 137(6):687–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dashe JS, Mclntire DD, Ramus RM, et al. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99(5 Pt l):692–697

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salker M, Teklenburg G, Molokhia M, et al Natural selection of human embryos: impaired decidualization of endometrium disables embryomaternal interactions and causes recurrent pregnancy loss. Plos One, 2010, 5(4):el0287

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cho JY, Lee YH, Moon MH, et al. Difference in migration of placenta according to the location and type of placenta previa. J Clin Ultras, 2008, 36(2):79–84

    Google Scholar 

  12. King DL. Placental migration demonstrated by ultrasonography. A hypothesis of dynamic placentation. Radiology, 1973, 109(1):167–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Varma TR. The implication of a low implantation of the placenta detected by ultrasonography in early pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1981, 60(3):265–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Debski R, Makuch K. Ultrasonographic assessment of changes in the location of the lower border (termed migration) of the placenta. Wiadomosci lekarskie, 1990, 43(11):506–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li WZ, Yong TZ. Continuous ultrasonic observation on the change of location of placenta in placenta previa. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi (Chinese), 1990, 25(6):335–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Green JR. Placenta previa and abruptio placenta. In: Creasy RK, ResnikR, (eds) Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994, 602–607

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Ultrasound Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Medical Records Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Su-hua Chen.

Additional information

This project was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81701476 and 81200354), Hubei Provincial Population and Family Planning Commission of China (No. JS-20130017), and Applied Basic Research Plan of Wuhan (No. 2015060101010037).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, Y., Li, Xy., Xiao, J. et al. Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes: Complete versus Incomplete Placenta Previa in Mid-pregnancy. CURR MED SCI 38, 597–601 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-018-1919-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-018-1919-9

Key words

Navigation