Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of DNA methylation and histone modification on differentiation-associated gene expression in ES, NIH3T3, and NIT-1

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of epigenetic modification on the differentiation of islet cells and the expression of associated genes (Pdx-1, Pax4, MafA, and Nkx6.1, etc) were investigated. The promoter methylation status of islet differentiation-associated genes (Pdx-1, Pax4, MafA and Nkx6.1), Oct4 and MLH1 genes of mouse embryonic stem cells, NIH3T3 cells and NIT-1 cells were profiled by methylated DNA immunoprecipitation, real-time quantitative PCR (MeDIP-qPCR) techniques. The histone modification status of these genes promoter region in different cell types was also measured by using chromatin immunoprecipitation real-time quantitative PCR methods. The expression of these genes in these cells was detected by using real-time quantitative PCR. The relationship between the epigenetic modification (DNA methylation, H3 acetylation, H3K4m3 and H3K9m3) of these genes and their expression was analyzed. The results showed that: (1) the transcription-initiation-sites of Pdx-1, MafA and Nkx6.1 were highly methylated in NIH3T3 cells; (2) NIH3T3 cells showed a significantly higher level of DNA methylation modification in the transcription-initiation-site of Pdx-1, Pax4, MafA and Nkx6.1 genes than that in mES cells and NIT-1 cells (P<0.05); (3) NIT-1 cells had a significantly higher level of H3K4m3 modification in the transcription-initiation-site of Pdx-1, Pax4, MafA and Nkx6.1 genes than that in mES cells and NIH3T3 cells (P<0.05), with significantly increased level of gene expression; (4) NIH3T3 cell had a significantly higher level of H3K9m3 modification in the transcription-initiation-site of Pdx-1, Pax4, MafA and Nkx6.1 genes than that in mES cells and with NIT-1 cell (P<0.05), with no detectable mRNA expression of these genes. It was concluded that histone modification (H3K4m3 and H3K9m3) and DNA methylation might have an intimate communication between each other in the differentiation process from embryonic stem cells into islet cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arney KL, Fisher AG. Epigenetic aspects of differentiation. Cell Sci, 2004,117(19):4355–4363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Delcuve GP, Rastegar M, Davie JR. Epigenetic control. Cell Physiol, 2009,219(2):243–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Quina AS, Buschbeck M, Di Croce L. Chromatin structure and epigenetics. Biochem Pharmacol, 2006, 72(11):15 632–15 669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin C, Zhang Y. The diverse functions of histone lysine methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2005,6(11): 838–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Y. Transcriptional regulation by histone ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Genes Dev, 2003,17(22):2733–2740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Margueron R, Trojer P, Reinberg D. The key to development: interpreting the histone code? Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2005,15(2):163–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiriet C, Hayes JJ. Chromatin in need of a fix: phosphorylation of H2AX connects chromatin to DNA repair. Mol Cell, 2005,18(6):617–622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Razin A, Riggs AD. DNA methylation and gene function. Science, 1980,210(4470):604–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steimer A, Schöb H, Grossniklaus U. Epigenetic control of plant development: new layers of complexity. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2004,7(1):11–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Felsenfeld G, Groudine M. Controlling the double helix. Nature, 2003,421(1411): 448–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature, 2000,403(6765):4–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Naya FJ, Stellrecht CM, Tsai MJ, et al. Tissue-specific regulation of the insulin gene by a novel basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor. Genes Dev, 1995, 9(8):1009–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knepel W. Transcriptional control of pancreatic islet hormones gene expression. Exp Clin Endocrinol, 1993, 101(1):39–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Santi DV, Garrett CE, Barr PJ. On the mechanism of inhibition of DNA-cytosine methyltransferases by cytosine analogs. Cell, 1983,33(1):9–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chavez L, Jozefczuk J, Grimm C, et al. Computational analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation during the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells along the endodermal lineage. Genome Res, 2010,20(10):1441–1450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Landolin JM, Johnson DS, Trinklein ND, et al. Sequence features that drive human promoter function and tissue specificity. Genome Res, 2010,20(7):890–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradbury J. Human epigenome project up and running. PLoS Biol, 2003,1(3):E82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klose RJ, Bird AP. Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem Sci, 2006,31(2):89–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arney KL, Fisher AG. Epigenetic aspects of differentiation. Cell Science, 2004,117(Pt 19):4355–4363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kouzarides T. Histone acetylases and deacetylases in cell proliferation. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 1999,9(1):40–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Litt MD, Simpson M, Gaszner M, et al. Correlation between histone lysine methylation and developmental changes at the chicken beta-globin locus. Science, 2001,293(5539):2453–2455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson L, Mollah S, Garcia BA, et al. Mass spectrometry analysis of arabidopsis histone H3 reveals distinct combinations of post-translational modifications. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004,32(22):6511–6518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaissiere T, Sawan C, Herceg Z. Epigenetic interplay between histone modifications and DNA methylation in gene silencing. Mutat Res, 2008,659(1–2):40–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature, 2006,441(7091):349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loh YH, Wu Q, Chew JL, et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet, 2006,38(4):431–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofang Yu  (余小舫).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, A., Zhang, Y., Li, M. et al. Effects of DNA methylation and histone modification on differentiation-associated gene expression in ES, NIH3T3, and NIT-1. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 31, 10–16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-011-0142-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-011-0142-8

Key words

Navigation