Optimization Letters

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 455–473 | Cite as

Nesterov’s smoothing technique and minimizing differences of convex functions for hierarchical clustering

Original Paper
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

A bilevel hierarchical clustering model is commonly used in designing optimal multicast networks. In this paper, we consider two different formulations of the bilevel hierarchical clustering problem, a discrete optimization problem which can be shown to be NP-hard. Our approach is to reformulate the problem as a continuous optimization problem by making some relaxations on the discreteness conditions. Then Nesterov’s smoothing technique and a numerical algorithm for minimizing differences of convex functions called the DCA are applied to cope with the nonsmoothness and nonconvexity of the problem. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate our method.

Keywords

DC programming Nesterov’s smoothing technique Hierarchical clustering Subgradient Fenchel conjugate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

N. M. Nam: Research of this author was partly supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #1411817.

References

  1. 1.
    An, L.T.H., Belghiti, M.T., Tao, P.D.: A new efficient algorithm based on DC programming and DCA for clustering. J. Glob. Optim. 27, 503–608 (2007)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    An, L.T.H., Minh, L.H.: Optimization based DC programming and DCA for hierarchical clustering. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183, 1067–1085 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    An, L.T.H., Tao, P.D.: Convex analysis approach to D.C. programming: theory, algorithms and applications. Acta Math. Vietnam. 22, 289–355 (1997)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bagirov, A.: Derivative-free methods for unconstrained nonsmooth optimization and its numerical analysis. Investig. Oper. 19, 75–93 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bagirov, A., Jia, L., Ouveysi, I., Rubinov, A.M.: Optimization based clustering algorithms in multicast group hierarchies. In: Proceedings of the Australian Telecommunications, Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC), Melbourne, Australia (published on CD, ISNB 0-646-42229-4) (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bagirov, A., Taheri, S., Ugon, J.: Nonsmooth DC programming approach to the minimum sum-of-squares clustering problems. Pattern Recognit. 53, 12–24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hartman, P.: On functions representable as a difference of convex functions. Pac. J. Math. 9, 707–713 (1959)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nam, N.M., Rector, R.B., Giles, D.: Minimizing differences of convex functions with applications to facility location and clustering. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 173, 255–278 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nesterov, Y.: Gradient methods for minimizing composite functions. Math. Program. 140, 125–161 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nesterov, Y.: Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions. Math. Program. 103, 127–152 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ordin, B., Bagirov, A.: A heuristic algorithm for solving the minimum sum-of-squares clustering problems. J. Glob. Optim. 61, 341–361 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reinelt, G.: TSPLIB: a traveling salesman problem library. ORSA J. Comput. 3, 376–384 (1991)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rockafellar, R.T.: Conjugate Duality and Optimization. SIAM, Philadelphia (1974)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tao, P.D., An, L.T.H.: A d.c. optimization algorithm for solving the trust-region subproblem. SIAM J. Optim. 8, 476–505 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fariborz Maseeh Department of Mathematics and StatisticsPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.School of General StudiesStockton UniversityGallowayUSA

Personalised recommendations