Ionics

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 2951–2960 | Cite as

Synthesis and electrochemical performance of micro-mesoporous carbon-sulfur composite cathode for Li–S batteries

  • Yanan Liu
  • Meng Cheng
  • Xiaodong Guo
  • Zhenguo Wu
  • Yanxiao Chen
  • Wei Xiang
  • Jianshu Li
  • Benhe Zhong
Original Paper
  • 246 Downloads

Abstract

Even though significant improvement has been made in the Li–S battery technology, the poor cycling and rate performance have always limited the further growth. Thus, the development of cost-effective and high performing electrodes is considered to be an important technology for the practical aspect. It is quite logical that the porous electrode systems can improve the electrochemical performance of a given battery system. Here, this study benchmarks a new class of electrodes based on double (micro and meso)porous carbon spheres (MMPCs) prepared by a facile soft template method followed by wet chemical etching. The particle size analysis, performed by scanning electron microscopy, shows that the templating agents, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide(CTAB), have a distinct effect on the size distribution of carbon particles. Different electrochemical characterizations have been carried out to understand the effect of SDS and CTAB on the electrochemical performance of carbon-sulfur nanocomposite electrode. BET analysis shows that the pore size distribution of the carbon spheres prepared by only the soft template method (MPCs) is mainly in the micropore range, which limits the storage and the dispersive capacity. However, the etched samples (MMPCs) showed better electrochemical performance, such as high initial discharge capacity of 921 mAh g−1(sulfur loading ∼77.2%) with 82.7% capacity retention at the end of 150 cycles at 200 mA g−1 and an impressive rate capability of 1086 mAh g−1 at a current density of 100 mA g−1.This improved performance could be attributed to the double porous structure of MMPCs. Such a feasible and facile architecture provides a good strategy to prepare other different materials that require better material dispersion and electrode/electrolyte interactions.

Keywords

Micro-mesoporous carbon Soft template Electrochemical performance Lithium-sulfur batteries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science funds (21534008).

Supplementary material

11581_2017_2125_MOESM1_ESM.doc (56 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 56 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yin Y–X, Yao H–R, Guo Y-G (2016) Scientific and technological challenges toward application of lithium–sulfur batteries. Chin Phys B 25:205–211Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang Q, Wang Y, She ZW, Fu Z, Zhang R, Cui Y (2015) Understanding the anchoring effect of two-dimensional layered materials for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett 15:3780–3786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang JQ, Xu ZL, Abouali S, Garakani MA, Kim JK (2016) Porous graphene oxide/carbon nanotube hybrid films as interlayer for lithium–sulfur batteries. Carbon 99:624–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, Tarascon JM (2012) Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater 11(1):19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barghamadi M, Kapoor A, Wen C (2013) A review on Li–S batteries as a high efficiency rechargeable lithium battery. J Electrochem Soc 160(8):1256–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ji XL, Nazar LF (2010) Advances in Li-S batteries. J Mater Chem 20(44):9821–9826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang DW, Zeng Q, Zhou G, Yin L, Li F, Cheng HM, Gentle IR, Max Lu GQ (2013) Carbon–sulfur composites for Li–S batteries: status and prospects. J Mater Chem A 1:9382–9394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Konarov A, Li Z, Chen P (2015) Effect of mesoporous carbon microtube prepared by carbonizing the poplar catkin on sulfur cathode performance in Li/S batteries. J Alloy Compd 619:298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao C, Liu L, Zhao H, Krall A, Wen Z, Chen J, Hurley P, Jiang J, Li Y (2014) Sulfur infiltrated porous carbon microspheres with controllable multi-modal poresize distribution for high energy lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano 6:882–888Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang C, Zhang Q, Zhao MQ, Huang JQ, Cheng XB, Tian GL, Peng HJ, Wei F (2014) Nitrogen-doped aligned carbon nanotube/graphene sandwiches: facile catalytic growth on Bifunctional natural catalysts and their applications as scaffolds for high–rate lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 26:6100–6105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peng HJ, Huang JQ, Zhao MQ, Zhang Q, Cheng XB, Liu XY, Qian WZ, Wei F (2014) Nanoarchitectured graphene/CNT@porous carbon with extraordinary electrical conductivity and interconnected micro/mesopores for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 24:2772–2781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang Y, Li D, Wu L, Zhou L, Du Y, Wang M, Li Y (2016) An intensive dispersion and synchronous assembly of single-walled carbon nanotubes in a surfactant–oil–water association system. Phys Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:10947–10953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang C, Lan M, Zhang Y, Bian H, Yuen MF, Ostrikov K, Jiang J, Zhang W, Li YY, Lu J (2016) Fe1−xS/C nanocomposites from sugarcane waste-derived microporous carbon for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Green Chem 18:3029–3039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi Y, Yu G (2016) Designing hierarchically nanostructured conductive polymer gels for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Chem Mater 28:2466–2477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao H, Du A, Ling M, Battaglia V, Liu G (2016) Conductive polymer binder for nano–silicon/graphite composite electrode in lithium–ion batteries towards a practical application. Electrochim Acta 209:159–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mao S, Lu G, Chen J (2015) Three-dimensional graphene-based composites for energy applications. Nano 7:6924–6943Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu Y, Shi G, Duan X (2015) Self-assembled three-dimensional grapheme macrostructures: synthesis and applications in supercapacitors. Acc Chem Res 48:1666–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schuster J, He G, Mandlmeier B, Yim T, Lee KT, Bein T, Nazar LF (2012) Spherical ordered mesoporous carbon nanoparticles with high porosity for lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:3591–3595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang Z, Li Q, Zhang K, Lai Y, Li J (2015) Micro-nano structure composite cathode material with high sulfur loading for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 152:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rehman S, Guo S, Hou Y (2016) Rational design of Si/SiO2@hierarchical porous carbon spheres as efficient polysulfide reservoirs for high-performance Li-S battery. Adv Mater 28:3167–3172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nafeie N, Montazer M, Nejad NH, Harifi T (2016) Electrical conductivity of different carbon nanotubes on wool fabric: an investigation on the effects of different dispersing agents and pretreatments. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 497:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herrington KL, Kaler EW, Miller DD, Zasadzinski JA, Chiruvolu S (1993) Phase behavior of aqueous mixtures of dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). J Phys Chem 97(51):13792–13802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen C, Sun X, Jiang X, Niu D, Yu A, Liu Z, Li J (2009) A two-step hydrothermal synthesis approach to monodispersed colloidal carbon spheres. Nanoscale Res Lett 4:971–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim JJ, Kim HS, Ahn J, Lee KJ, Yoo WC, Sung YE (2016) Activation of micropore-confined sulfur within hierarchical porous carbon for lithium-sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 306:617–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang Z, Li Z, Hao F, Wang X, Li Q, Qi Y, Fan R, Yin Y (2014) 3D interconnected porous carbon aerogels as sulfur immobilizers for sulfur impregnation for lithium–sulfur batteries with high rate capability and cycling stability. Adv Funct Mater 24:2500–2509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen X, Xiao Z, Ning X, Liu Z, Yang Z, Zou C, Wang S, Chen X, Chen Y, Huang S (2014) Sulfur-impregnated, sandwich-type, hybrid carbon nanosheets with hierarchical porous structure for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 4(13):13072–13072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lin C, Niu C, Xu X, Li K, Cai Z, Zhang Y, Wang X, Qu L, Xu Y, Mai L (2016) A facile synthesis of three-dimensional grapheme sponge composited with sulfur nanoparticles for flexible Li–S cathodes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:22146–22153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qian W, Gao Q, Tian W, Zhang H, Tan Y, Li Z (2016) One-pot in situ chemical reduction of graphene oxide and recombination of sulphur as a cathode material for a Li-S battery. J Mater Chem A 4:15140–15147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zheng J, Gu M, Wagner MJ, Hays KA, Li X, Zuo P, Wang C, Zhang JG, Liu J, Xiao J (2013) Revisit carbon/sulfur composite for Li–S batteries. J Electrochem Soc 160(10):A1624–A1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang B, Qin X, Li GR, Gao XP (2010) Enhancement of long stability of sulfur cathode by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres. Energy Environ Sci 3:1531–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li N, Zheng M, Lu H, Hu Z, Shen C, Chang X, Ji G, Cao J, Shi Y (2012) High-rate lithium–sulfur batteries promoted by reduced graphene oxide coating. Chem Commun 48:4106–4108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu M, Tang Q, Dong F, Wang Y, Li D, Guo Q, Liu Y, Qiao J (2016) The design of Fe, N-doped hierarchically porous carbons as highly active and durable electrocatalysts for a Zn-air battery. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:18665–18669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zeng F, Jin Z, Yuan K, Liu S, Cheng X, Wang A, Wang W, Yang Y (2013) High performance lithium–sulfur batteries with a permselective sulfonated acetylene black modified separator. J Mater Chem A 4:12319–12327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yang K, Gao Q, Tan Y, Tian W, Qian W, Zhu L, Yang C (2016) Biomass-derived porous carbon with micropores and small mesopores for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Eur J 22:3239–3244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanan Liu
    • 1
  • Meng Cheng
    • 1
  • Xiaodong Guo
    • 1
  • Zhenguo Wu
    • 1
  • Yanxiao Chen
    • 1
  • Wei Xiang
    • 2
  • Jianshu Li
    • 3
  • Benhe Zhong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Materials and Chemistry &Chemical EngineeringChengdu University of TechnologyChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Polymer Science and Engineering, State Kay Laboratory of Polymer Materials EngineeringSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations