Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Entrepreneurial Orientation in Multinational Corporations: Antecedents and Effects

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite its importance to business performance, the role of Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) in multinational corporations (MNCs) is under-researched. This study investigates the drivers of EO and its performance outcome in the context of large MNCs. The authors theorize that an MNC’s organizational characteristics drive the formation of its EO and an MNC’s EO affects its performance in the global market under certain contingency conditions. Based on a survey of large MNCs, the authors find that an MNC’s EO is positively affected by its technological flexibility and subsidiary cooperation, and negatively influenced by centralization of its organizational structure. In addition, EO’s positive effect on an MNC’s performance is weakened by its international experience. This study advances the literature by developing and empirically supporting a theory of EO in large MNCs. The results also have significant implications for MNCs that consider adopting EO to improve their performance in the global market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta, A. S., Crespo, Á. H., & Agudo, J. C. (2018). Effect of market orientation, network capability and entrepreneurial orientation on international performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). International Business Review,27(6), 1128–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersén, J. (2010). A critical examination of the EO-performance relationship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research,16(4), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. S., Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2009). Understanding the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic learning capability: An empirical investigation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,3(3), 218–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research,14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Baumgartner, H. (1994). The evaluation of structural equation models and hypothesis testing. Principles of Marketing Research,1(10), 386–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2000). Entrepreneurship in the global firm: Enterprise and renewal. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., Nakos, G., & Dimitratos, P. (2015). SME entrepreneurial orientation, international performance, and the moderating role of strategic alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,39(5), 1161–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy-performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing,58(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. B., & Williams, C. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: Mediating effects of technology and marketing action across industry types. Industry and Innovation,23(8), 673–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,35(5), 855–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Miller, D. (2014). International entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,38(1), 11–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1988). The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies,25(3), 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal,10(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2012). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,36(4), 677–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., Fan, D., Guo, F., & Fan, Y. (2018). Explicating the relationship of entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Underlying mechanisms in the context of an emerging market. Industrial Marketing Management,71, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. T. (2013). Organizational social capital, formalization, and internal knowledge sharing in entrepreneurial orientation formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,37(3), 505–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitratos, P., Lioukas, S., & Carter, S. (2004). The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: The importance of domestic environment. International Business Review,13(1), 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, X., Hinsch, C. A., Zou, S., & Fu, H. (2013). The effect of market orientation dimensions on multinational SBU’s strategic performance. International Marketing Review,30(6), 591–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felzensztein, C., Ciravegna, L., Robson, P., & Amorós, J. E. (2015). Networks, entrepreneurial orientation, and internationalization scope: Evidence from Chilean small and medium enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management,53(1), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review,25(1), 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (2014). Knowledge Creation and Social Networks in Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Renewal of Organizational Capability. In M. Shamiyeh (Ed.), Driving desired futures: Turning design thinking into real innovation (pp. 160–183). Basel: Birkhauser Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, B. A. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation: A theoretical and empirical examination of the consequences of differing construct representations. Journal of Management Studies,48(6), 1291–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review,15(4), 603–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1989). Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal,10(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal,48(5), 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1985). Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Academy of Management Review,10(3), 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grøgaard, B., & Colman, H. L. (2016). Interpretive frames as the organization’s “mirror”: From espoused values to social integration in MNEs. Management International Review,56(2), 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review,16(4), 768–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1994). Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Review,3(4), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal,21(4), 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacklin, F., Battistini, B., & Von Krogh, G. (2013). Strategic choices in converging industries. MIT Sloan Management Review,55(1), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017a). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,45(5), 616–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017b). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis,1(2), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,40(3), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y.-S. (1995). The international transferability of the firm’s advantages. California Management Review,37(4), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management,29(6), 963–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Kyläheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship,3(3), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. C., & Martíanez, J. I. (2010). Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in spain. Strategic Management Journal,11(7), 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing,57(3), 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2011). The CEO of Heinz on powering growth in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review,89(10), 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karami, M., & Tang, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and SME international performance: The mediating role of networking capability and experiential learning. International Small Business Journal,37(2), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Park, J. H., & Prescott, J. E. (2003). The global integration of business functions: A study of multinational businesses in integrated global industries. Journal of International Business Studies,34(4), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies,24(4), 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing,54(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-H., Huang, J.-W., & Tsai, M.-T. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management,38(4), 440–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal,9(S1), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review,21(1), 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies,38(4), 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. L., & Javalgi, R. R. G. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation, marketing capabilities and performance: The moderating role of competitive intensity on Latin American International new ventures. Journal of Business Research,69(6), 2040–2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., & Venkataraman, S. (1995). Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm. Strategic Management Journal,16(4), 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science,29(7), 770–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Avila, R. A., & Allen, J. (1993). Individualism and the modern corporation: Implications for innovation and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management,19(3), 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., & Trotter, J. D. (1990). Institutionalizing entrepreneurship in a large company: A case study at AT&T. Industrial Marketing Management,19(2), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal,14(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. (1997). The differentiated network: Organizations knowledge flows in multinational corporations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science,5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., Jr., & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. The Journal of Marketing,59(1), 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phene, A., & Almeida, P. (2008). Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies,39(5), 901–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5), 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Frese, M., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2004). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: Cumulative empirical evidence. In Paper presented at the 23rd Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference. Glasgow: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,33(3), 761–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripollés-Meliá, M., Menguzzato-Boulard, M., & Sánchez-Peinado, L. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation and international commitment. Journal of International Entrepreneurship,5(3–4), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbusch, N., Rauch, A., & Bausch, A. (2013). The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the task environment–performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management,39(3), 633–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K., Schweiger, D. M., & Morrison, A. J. (1991). Global strategy implementation at the business unit level: Operational capabilities and administrative mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies,22(3), 369–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, S., & Roth, K. (1992). The influence of global marketing standardization on performance. Journal of Marketing,56(2), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semrau, T., Ambos, T., & Kraus, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance across societal cultures: An international study. Journal of Business Research,69(5), 1928–1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. The Journal of Marketing,59(3), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Tang, Z., & Cowden, B. J. (2017). Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, CEO dual values, and SME performance in state–owned vs. nonstate–owned enterprises in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,41(6), 883–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales, W. J. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal,34(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales, W. J., Gupta, V. K., & Mousa, F. T. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal,31(4), 357–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J. (1998). Small firm growth and performance: Entrepreneurship and beyond: Internationella Handelshögskolan.

  • Wiklund, J. (2006). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms,24(1), 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal,24(13), 1307–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing,20(1), 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2018). Venturing in international firms: Contexts and cases in a high-tech world. Durham: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., & Lee, S. H. (2009). Resource allocations, knowledge network characteristics and entrepreneurial orientation of multinational corporations. Research Policy,38(8), 1376–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., & Lee, S. H. (2011). Entrepreneurial contexts and knowledge coordination within the multinational corporation. Journal of World Business,46(2), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing,10(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing,15(5), 469–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, R., Grøgaard, B., & Steel, P. (2018). Complements or substitutes? A meta-analysis of the role of integration mechanisms for knowledge transfer in the MNE network. Journal of World Business,53(4), 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Tansuhaj, P., & Mccullough, J. (2009). International entrepreneurial capability: The measurement and a comparison between born global firms and traditional exporters in China. Journal of International Entrepreneurship,7(4), 292–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal,31(5), 547–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2002). The GMS: A broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Marketing,66(4), 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by a Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#71472097).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Xu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Zou, S., Xu, H. et al. Entrepreneurial Orientation in Multinational Corporations: Antecedents and Effects. Manag Int Rev 60, 123–148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-019-00397-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-019-00397-4

Keywords

Navigation