Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of psychopathic traits on the acceptance of white-collar crime: do corporate psychopaths cook the books and misuse the news?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to several empirical shortcomings in the research of personality characteristics in ethical decision making, we address in this paper the concept of corporate psychopathy in the organizational context. Corporate psychopaths are individuals successfully working in organizations, but are selfish, manipulative, and exhibit a lack of empathy, remorse, and conscience; therefore, they may be viewed as risk factors for organizations. While there is abundant literature on the connection between clinical psychopathy and criminal behavior, such research is scarce in the business context where successful psychopaths operate. Thus, we examine if the malevolent traits of corporate psychopaths predict the acceptance of different forms of white-collar crime. In doing so, we conduct two survey studies in which we first measure participants’ psychopathic tendencies and then assess their acceptance of either an accounting fraud or an insider-trading situation. Consistent with our hypotheses and across both studies, we find a highly significant relationship between personality traits that are associated with corporate psychopathy and the acceptance of white-collar crime. This paper discusses the implications of these findings and identifies some potentially useful approaches for excluding corporate psychopaths from organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A, Cooper T (2015) Insider trading before accounting scandals. J Corp Finance 34:169–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis H, Bradley KJ (2014) Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organ Res Methods 17:351–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AICPA (2016) Management override of internal control: the Achilles’ Heel of fraud prevention. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1977) Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Pol Psychol Bull 84:888–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge A, Levine K (2001) Surveying the social world: principles and practice in survey research. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander CS, Becker HJ (1978) The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opin Quart 42:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpers GW, Eisenbarth H (2008) Psychopathic personality inventory-revised. Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth BE, Anand V (2003) The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res Organ Behav 25:1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atzmüller C, Steiner PM (2010) Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology-Eur 6:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak P (2000) Psychopathic manipulation at work. In: Gacono CB (ed) The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: a practitioner’s guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 287–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak P (2007) From darkness into the light: psychopathy in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Hervé H, Yuille JC (eds) The psychopath: theory, research, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 411–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak P, Hare RD (2006) Snakes in suits: when psychopaths go to work. Harper Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak P, Neumann CS, Hare RD (2010) Corporate psychopathy: talking the walk. Behavioral Science and the Law 28:174–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass K, Barnett T, Brown G (1999) Individual difference variables, ethical judgements, and ethical behavioral intentions. Bus Ethics Q 9:183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Funder DC (2007) Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspect Psychol Sci 2:396–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayou ME, Reinstein A, Williams PF (2011) To tell the truth: a discussion of issues concerning truth and ethics in accounting. Acc Organ Soc 36:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson ML, Van Slyke SR, Cullen FT (2016) Core themes in the study of white-collar crime. In: Van Slyke SR, Benson ML, Cullen FT (eds) The Oxford Handbook of White-Collar Crime. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersoff DM (1999) Why good people sometimes do bad things: motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25:28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blickle G, Schlegel A, Fassbender P, Klein U (2006) Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Appl Psychol-Int Rev 55:220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommestein HJ (2006) How to restore trust in financial markets. In: Dembinski PH, Lager C, Cornford A, Bonvin JM (eds) Enron and world finance: a case study in ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 180–192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Board BJ, Fritzon K (2005) Disordered personalities at work. Psychol Crime Law 11:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy CR (2005) The implications of corporate psychopaths for business and society: an initial examination and a call to arms. Australas J Bus Behav Sci 1:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy CR (2006) The dark side of management decisions: organizational psychopaths. Manage Decis 44:1461–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy CR (2011a) Corporate psychopaths: organizational destroyers. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy CR (2011b) Corporate psychopaths, bullying and unfair supervision in the workplace. J Bus Ethics 100:367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy CR (2011c) The corporate psychopaths: theory of the global financial crisis. J Bus Ethics 102:255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy CR (2012) The impact of corporate psychopaths on corporate reputation and marketing. Mark Rev 12:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy CR, Ladyshewsky RK, Galvin P (2010) The influence of corporate psychopaths on corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment to employees. J Bus Ethics 97:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy CR, Galvin P, Ladyshewsky RK (2011) Corporate psychopaths. In: Millar C, Poole E (eds) Ethical leadership: global challenges and perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 17–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite J (1985) White-collar crime. Annu Rev Sociol 11:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundeskriminalamt (2015) Wirtschaftskriminalität—Bundeslagebild 2015. BKA, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael JL, Collins C, Emsell P, Haydon J (2011) Leadership and management development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB, Buchholtz AK (2015) Business and society: ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management, 9th edn. Cengage Learning, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss DF, Schutt RK (2016) Making sense of the social world: methods of investigation, 5th edn. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M (1990) Business crime: its nature and control. St Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J (2005) Working with monsters: how to identify and protect yourself from the workplace psychopath. Random House Australia, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleckley HM (1988) The mask of sanity: an attempt to clarify some issues about the so-called psychopathic personality, 5th edn. Private printing for educational use by Emily S, Cleckley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JR, Pant LW, Sharp DJ (2001) An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. J Bus Ethics 30:319–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornford A (2006) Enron and internationally agreed principles for corporate governance and the financial sector. In: Dembinski PH, Lager C, Cornford A, Bonvin JM (eds) Enron and world finance: a case study in ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 19–53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Craft JL (2013) A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. J Bus Ethics 117:221–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane A, Matten D (2016) Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey DR (1953) Other people’s money: study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen FT, Cavender G, Maakestad WJ, Benson ML (2015) Corporate crime under attack: the fight to criminalize business violence, 2nd edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley J (1996) How organizations socialize individuals into evil-doing. In: Messick D, Tenbrunsel A (eds) Codes of conduct: behavioral research into business ethics. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 13–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Deigh J (2010) An introduction to ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deutschman A (2005) Is your boss a psychopath? Fast Company. http://www.fastcompany.com/53247/your-boss-psychopath. Accessed 18 October 2016

  • Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: the tailored design method, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton K (2012) The wisdom of psychopaths. William Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelhertz H (1970) The nature, impact and prosecution of white-collar crime. United States Government Printing Office, Washington D. C

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelhertz H (1983) White-collar and professional crime—the challenge for the 1980s. Am Behav Sci 27:109–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen S, Aasland MS, Skogstad A (2007) Destructive leadership behaviour: a definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quart 18:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbarth H, Lilienfeld SO, Yarkoni T (2015) Using a genetic algorithm to abbreviate the psychopathic personality inventory-revised (PPI–R). Psychol Assessment 27:194–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2006) The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism—experimental evidence and new theories. In: Kolm SC, Ythier JM (eds) Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 615–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RJ (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res 20:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RJ, Tellis GJ (1998) Removing social desirability bias with indirect questioning: is the cure worse than the disease? Adv Consc Res 25:563–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs D (2004) Enron et al.: paradigmatic white collar crime cases for the new century. Crit Criminol 12:113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzon K, Bailey C, Croom S, Brooks N (2017) Problem personalities in the workplace: development of the corporate personality inventory. In: Granhag PA, Bull R, Shaboltas A, Dozortseva E (eds) Psychology and law in Europe: When west meets east. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 139–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche DJ, Becker H (1984) Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy—an empirical investigation. Acad Manage Rev 27:166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa K (2002) Developing a framework for ethically questionable behavior in consumption. J Bus Ethics 41:99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A, Richards SC, Paulhus DL (2013) The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 7:199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry A (2011) Pass the PCL-R: your guide to passing the Hare psychopathy checklist-revised AKA the psychopath test. CreateSpace, Charleston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk P (2015) Fraud examiners in white-collar crime investigations. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gravetter FJ, Forzano LAB (2016) Research methods for the behavioral sciences, 5th edn. Cengage Learning, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall JR, Benning SD (2006) The “successful” psychopath: adaptive and subclinical manifestations of psychopathy in the general population. In: Patrick CJ (ed) Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press, New York, pp 459–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD (1994) Predators: the disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Psychol Today 27(1):55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD (1999) Without conscience: the disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD (2003) The Hare psychopathy: checklist-revised, 2nd edn. Multi-Health Systems, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD (2007) Forty years are not enough: recollections, random musings, and prognostications. In: Hervé H, Yuille JC (eds) The psychopath: theory, research, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD, Neumann CS (2008) Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annu Rev Clin Psycho 4:217–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD, Neumann CS (2010) Psychopathy: assessment and forensic implications. In: Malatesti L, McMillan J (eds) Responsibility and psychopathy: interfacing law, psychiatry and philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 93–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley RD (2008) Corporate crime: a reference handbook. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Heissner S (2015) Managing business integrity: prevent, detect, and investigate white-collar crime and corruption. Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henry S (2013) Crime. In: McLaughlin E, Muncie J (eds) The SAGE dictionary of criminology, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, London, pp 85–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervé H (2007a) Psychopathy across the ages: a history of the Hare psychopath. In: Hervé H, Yuille JC (eds) The psychopath: theory, research, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 31–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervé H (2007b) Psychopathic subtypes: historical and contemporary perspectives. In: Hervé H, Yuille JC (eds) The psychopath: theory, research, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 431–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbig BE, Zettler I (2015) When the cat’s away, some mice will play: a basic trait account of dishonest behavior. J Res Pers 57:72–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan R (2004) Personality psychology for organizational researchers. In: Schneider B, Smith DB (eds) Personality and organizations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM (1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Acad Manage Rev 16:366–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1996) Critique of pure reason. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffler U (2016) Studentische Surrogation in der laborexperimentellen Controllingforschung. Josef Eul Verlag, Lohmar

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumpal I (2013) Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant 47:2025–2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn C (2012) Psychopathen in Nadelstreifen. Josef Eul Verlag, Lohmar

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz J, Linder S (2012) Organizational control and work effort—another look at the interplay of rewards and motivation. Eur Account Rev 21:591–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpper HU (2011) Unternehmensethik: Hintergründe, Konzepte, Anwendungsbereiche, 2nd edn. Schäffer Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpper HU (2015) Analytische Unternehmensethik. In: Van Aaken D, Schreck P (eds) Theorien der Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Suhrkamp, Berlin, pp 335–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpper HU, Sandner K (2011) Anreizsysteme und Unternehmensethik. Z Betriebswirt 81:119–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbert MB (2010) Managing psychopathic employees. Cornell HR Review: 1–5

  • Leinweber DJ, Madhavan AN (2001) Three hundred years of stock market manipulations. J Investing 10:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepsinger R, Lucia AD (2009) The art and science of 360 degree feedback, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Franciso

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld SO, Widows MR (2005) Psychopathic personality inventory revised: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld SO, Latzman RD, Watts AL, Smith SF, Dutton K (2014) Correlates of psychopathic personality traits in everyday life: results from a large community survey. Frontiers in Psychology 5:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström D (2004) Historical perspectives: swedish and international examples. In: Sjögren H, Skogh G (eds) New perspectives on economic crime. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 128–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingnau V (2016) Controlling und Ethik. In: Becker W, Ulrich P (eds) Handbuch Controlling. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 725–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingnau V, Dehne-Niemann TE (2015) When managing is damaging—corporate psychopaths and their potential impact on stakeholders’ achievement of objectives in the global supply chain. In: Vorbohle K, Quandt JH, Schank C (eds) Verantwortung in der globalen Wertschöpfung, pp 71–92

  • Lingnau V, Dehne-Niemann TE (2016) Vorsicht Psychopath: HR-Kennzahlen als Warnsignale. Controlling & Management Review 60:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu C, Hare RD, Jones DN, Babiak P, Neumann CS (2013) Factor structure of the B-Scan 360: a measure of corporate psychopathy. Psychol Assessment 25:288–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu C, Neumann CS, Hare RD, Babiak P (2014) A dark side of leadership: corporate psychopathy and its influence on employee well-being and job satisfaction. Pers Individ Dif 59:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield MG, Babbie ER (2016) Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology, 4th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazar N, Ariely D (2006) Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. J Publ Policy Mark 25:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill P, Chapman S (2006) Research methods, 1st reprint of the, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell ML, Jolley JM (2013) Research design explained, 8th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse G (2004) Executive psychopaths. Harvard Bus Rev 82:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman WL (2011) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 7th edn. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann CS, Hare RD (2008) Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: links to violence, alcohol use and intelligence. J Consult Clin Psych 76:893–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman DJ (1958) White-collar crime. Law Contemp Problems 23:735–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon MJ, Butterfield KD (2005) A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. J Bus Ethics 59:375–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oll J, Hahn R, Reimsbach D, Kotzian P (2016) Tackling complexity in business and society research: the methodological and thematic potential of factorial surveys. Bus Soc 1–34. doi:10.1177/0007650316645337

  • Padilla A, Hogan R, Kaiser RB (2007) The toxic triangle: destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. Leadership Quart 18:176–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus DL, Williams KM (2002) The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J Res Pers 36:556–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson DK (2002) Deviant workplace behavior and the organization’s ethical climate. J Bus Psychol 17:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson LR, Peterson MJ (1959) Short-term retention of individual verbal items. J Exp Psychol 58:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabl T (2012) Do contextual factors matter? An investigation of ethical judgments of corrupt acts. Z Betriebswirt 82:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae SB (2009) Moral choices: an introduction to ethics, 3rd edn. HarperCollins, Grand Rapids

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragatz LL, Fremouw W, Baker E (2012) The psychological profile of white-collar offenders: demographics, criminal thinking, psychopathic traits, and psychopathology. Justice Behavior 39:978–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauthmann JF (2012) The dark triad and interpersonal perception: similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 3:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray JV, Jones S (2011) Self-reported psychopathic traits and their relation to intentions to engage in environmental offending. Int J Offender Ther 55:370–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest JR (1986) Moral development: advances in research and theory. Praeger, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauviat C (2006) The demise of Andersen: a consequence of corporate governance failure in the context of major changes in the accounting profession and the audit market. In: Dembinski PH, Lager C, Cornford A, Bonvin JM (eds) Enron and world finance: a case study in ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 143–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke M, Arnaud A, Kuenzi M (2007) The power of ethical work climates. Organ Dyn 36:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims RR, Brinkmann J (2003) Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes). J Bus Ethics 45:243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem J, Polaschek D, Patrick C, Lilienfeld S (2011) Psychopathic personality: bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychol Sci Publ Interest 12:95–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SF, Lilienfeld SO (2013) Psychopathy in the workplace: the knowns and unknowns. Aggress Violent Beh 18:204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer Pickett KH, Pickett JM (2002) Financial crime investigation and control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenhaut S, Van Kenhove P (2006) The mediating role of anticipated guilt in consumers’ ethical decision-making. J Bus Ethics 69:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens GW, Deuling JK, Armenakis AA (2012) Successful psychopaths: are they unethical decision-makers and why? J Bus Ethics 105:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sue VM, Ritter LA (2012) Conducting online surveys, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland EH (1949) White collar crime. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland EH (1983) White collar crime: the uncut version. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang TL, Chen Y, Sutarso T (2008) Bad apples in bad (business) barrels: the love of money, machiavellianism, risk tolerance, and unethical behavior. Manage Decis 46:243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonge A, Greer L, Lawton A (2003) The Enron story: you can fool some of the people some of the time …. Bus Ethics 12:4–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aaken D, Schreck P (2015) Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik: Ein Überblick über die Forschungslandschaft. In: Van Aaken D, Schreck P (eds) Theorien der Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Suhrkamp, Berlin, pp 7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Weathington BL, Cunningham CJL, Pittenger DJ (2010) Research methods for the behavioral and social sciences. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster M, Sell J (2014) Why do experiments? In: Webster M, Sell J (eds) Laboratory experiments in the social sciences, 2nd edn. Elsevier, London, pp 5–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JW (2014) Business ethics: a stakeholder and issues management approach, 6th edn. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler S, Weisburd D, Bode N (1982) Sentencing the white-collar offender: rhetoric and reality. Am Sociol Rev 47:641–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams KM, Paulhus DL, Hare RD (2007) Capturing the four-factor structure of psychopathy in college students via self-report. J Pers Assess 88:205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe DT, Hermanson DR (2004) The fraud diamond: considering the four elements of fraud. CPA J 74:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink KJ (2005) Stakeholder orientation and corporate social responsibility as a precondition for sustainability. Total Qual Manage 16:1041–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jenna Flogeras for proof-reading the manuscript, Vanessa Fontaine for help during the data-gathering process and Franziska Schmidt for writing assistance. We also thank the editors of the special issue and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

The influence of psychopathic traits on the acceptance of white-collar crime: Do corporate psychopaths cook the books and misuse the news?

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Till E. Dehne-Niemann.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Vignettes

1.1.1 Vignette study 1

Mister Bender is working as an accountant in a pharmaceutical company where he is solely responsible for preparing the balance sheet. The company promises an annual cash incentive that is linked to the profit of the financial year: “The higher the profit, the higher the bonus!” This fact misleads Mister Bender to distort the results of the current financial year in his favor. Although this is illegal, Mister Bender is not concerned about being discovered due to his ultimate authority over the balance sheets. As a result, his cash incentive increases by a significant amount.

1.1.2 Vignette study 2

Mister Gross is working for a pharmaceutical company listed on the stock exchange. By means of a confidential source, he receives information that within the next few days the share price of the company will most likely increase due to a resounding success of the research and development department. At this time, this notification is not yet available to the general public. For this reason, Mister Gross decides to buy shares, thus making this information profitable for himself, even though this act is illegal. Because of the confidentiality of his source, he is not afraid that someone can prove the use of inside information.

Original vignettes were presented in German.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lingnau, V., Fuchs, F. & Dehne-Niemann, T.E. The influence of psychopathic traits on the acceptance of white-collar crime: do corporate psychopaths cook the books and misuse the news?. J Bus Econ 87, 1193–1227 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0864-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0864-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation