Advertisement

Automatic intraoperative estimation of blood flow direction during neurosurgical interventions

  • Daniel Høyer Iversen
  • Lasse Løvstakken
  • Geirmund Unsgård
  • Ingerid Reinertsen
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

In neurosurgery, reliable information about blood vessel anatomy and flow direction is important to identify, characterize, and avoid damage to the vasculature. Due to ultrasound Doppler angle dependencies and the complexity of the vascular architecture, clinically valuable 3-D flow direction information is currently not available. In this paper, we aim to clinically validate and demonstrate the intraoperative use of a fully automatic method for estimation of 3-D blood flow direction from freehand 2-D Doppler ultrasound.

Methods

A 3-D vessel model is reconstructed from 2-D Doppler ultrasound and used to determine the vessel architecture. The blood flow direction is then estimated automatically using the model in combination with Doppler velocity data. To enable testing and validation during surgery, the method was implemented as part of the open-source navigation system CustusX (www.custusx.org).

Results

Ten patients were included prospectively. Data from four patients were processed postoperatively, and data from six patients were processed intraoperatively. In total, the blood flow direction was estimated for 48 different blood vessels with a success rate of 98%.

Conclusions

In this work, we have shown that the proposed method is suitable for fully automatic estimation of the blood flow direction in intracranial vessels during neurosurgical interventions. The method has the potential to make the understanding of the complex vascular anatomy and flow pattern more intuitive for the surgeon. The method is compatible with intraoperative use, and results can be presented within the limited time frame where they still are of clinical interest.

Keywords

Blood flow Neurosurgery Intraoperative Ultrasound 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Albayrak B, Samdani aF, Black PM (2004) Intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 146(6):543–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Askeland C, Solberg OV, Bakeng JBL, Reinertsen I, Tangen GA, Hofstad EF, Iversen DH, Våpenstad C, Selbekk T, Langø T, Hernes TAN, Leira HO, Unsgård G, Lindseth F (2015) Custusx: an open-source research platform for image-guided therapy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilsbach JM, Hassler WE (1984) Intraoperative Doppler and real time sonography in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev 7(2):199–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hölscher T, Rodriguez-Rodriguez J, Wilkening WG, Lasheras JC (2006) Intraoperative brain ultrasound: a new approach to study flow dynamics in intracranial aneurysms. Ultrasound Med Biol 32(9):1307–1313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Homann H (2007) Implementation of a 3D thinning algorithm. Insight J 421Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Imbault M, Chauvet D, Gennisson JL, Capelle L, Tanter M (2017) Intraoperative functional ultrasound imaging of human brain activity. Sci Rep 7:7304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iversen DH, Lindseth F, Unsgaard G, Torp H, Lovstakken L (2013) Model-based correction of velocity measurements in navigated 3-D ultrasound imaging during neurosurgical interventions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(9):1622–1631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kersten-Oertel M, Gerard I, Drouin S, Mok K, Sirhan D, Sinclair DS, Collins DL (2015) Augmented reality in neurovascular surgery: feasibility and first uses in the operating room. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(11):1823–1836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oygard T (2014) Improved distance weighted GPU-based 3D ultrasound reconstruction methods. Master’s thesis, NTNUGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reinertsen I, Lindseth F, Unsgaard G, Collins DL (2007) Clinical validation of vessel-based registration for correction of brain-shift. Med Image Anal 11(6):673–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reinertsen I, Lindseth F, Askeland C, Iversen DH, Unsgård G (2014) Intra-operative correction of brain-shift. Acta Neurochir 156(7):1301–1310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rygh OM, Nagelhus Hernes TA, Lindseth F, Selbekk T, Brostrup Muller T, Unsgaard G (2006) Intraoperative navigated 3-dimensional ultrasound angiography in tumor surgery. Surg Neurol 66(6):581–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smistad E, Elster AC, Lindseth F (2014) GPU accelerated segmentation and centerline extraction of tubular structures from medical images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(4):561–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Unsgaard G, Ommedal S, Muller T, Gronningsaeter A, Ta Nagelhus Hernes (2002) Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: initial experience during brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 50(4):804–812 (discussion 812) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Unsgaard G, Ommedal S, Rygh OM, Lindseth F (2005) Operation of arteriovenous malformations assisted by stereoscopic navigation-controlled display of preoperative magnetic resonance angiography and intraoperative ultrasound angiography. Neurosurgery 56(Supplement 2):281–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Unsgaard G, Rygh OM, Selbekk T, Müller TB, Kolstad F, Lindseth F, Hernes TN (2006) Intra-operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 148(3):235–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Unsgaard G, Solheim O, Lindseth F, Selbekk T (2011) Intraoperative imaging with 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 109:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Unsgård G, Rao V, Solheim O, Lindseth F (2016) Clinical experience with navigated 3D ultrasound angiography (power Doppler) in microsurgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir 158:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woydt M, Greiner K, Perez J, Krone A, Roosen K (1997) Intraoperative color duplex sonography of basal arteries during aneurysm surgery. J Neuroimaging Off J Am Soc Neuroimaging 7(4):203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woydt M, Perez J, Meixensberger J, Krone A, Soerensen N, Roosen K (1998) Intra-operative colour-duplex-sonography in the surgical management of cerebral AV-malformations. Acta Neurochir 140(7):689–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yoo TS, Ackerman MJ, Lorensen WE, Schroeder W, Chalana V, Aylward S, Metaxas D, Whitaker R (2002) Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing API: a technical report on ITK-the insight toolkit. Stud Health Technol Inform 85:586–592PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Høyer Iversen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Lasse Løvstakken
    • 1
  • Geirmund Unsgård
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ingerid Reinertsen
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Circulation and Medical ImagingNorwegian University for Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  2. 2.St. Olavs Hospital - Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgerySt. Olav University HospitalTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.Department of Neuromedicine and Movement ScienceNorwegian University for Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  5. 5.Department of Medical TechnologySINTEF HealthTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations