ArthroPlanner: a surgical planning solution for acromioplasty

  • Caecilia Charbonnier
  • Sylvain Chagué
  • Bart Kevelham
  • Delphine Preissmann
  • Frank C. Kolo
  • Olivier Rime
  • Alexandre Lädermann
Original Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

We present a computer-assisted planning solution “ArthroPlanner” for acromioplasty based on 3D anatomical models, computed tomography and joint kinematic simulations.

Methods

In addition to a standard static clinical evaluation (anamnesis, radiological examination), the software provides a dynamic assessment of the shoulder joint by computing in real time the joint kinematics from a database of activities of daily living. During motion, the precise bone resection (location and amount) is computed based on detected subacromial impingements, providing surgeons with precise information about the surgical procedure. Moreover, to improve the subjective reading of medical images, the software provides 3D measurement tools based on anatomical models assisting in the analysis of shoulder morphological features.

Results

We performed an in vivo assessment of the software in a prospective randomized clinical study conducted with 27 patients beneficiating from the planning solution and a control group of 31 patients without planning. Postoperatively, patient’s pain decreased, and the shoulder range of motion and the functional outcomes improved significantly and the rotator cuff healing rate was good for both groups without intergroup differences. The amount of bone resected at surgery was comparable between the groups. The percentage of remaining impingement after surgery was in average reduced to 51% without groups difference.

Conclusions

ArthroPlanner software includes all required materials (images data, 3D models, motion, morphological measurements, etc.) to improve orthopedists’ performance in the surgical planning of acromioplasty. The solution offers a perfect analysis of the patient’s anatomy and the ability to precisely analyze a dynamic mechanism to fully apprehend the patient’s condition and to fulfill his/her expectations. The study however failed to detect any statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes and bone resection between the groups. Short-term clinical and radiological results were excellent in both groups.

Keywords

Shoulder Subacromial impingement Acromioplasty 3D surgical planning Kinematics 3D simulations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Fondation Hans Wilsdorf, a nonprofit foundation with no commercial interest in the present study. We would like to thank Camille Laroquais for her help with the 3D reconstruction and postoperative analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving humans

Institutional ethical approval (CCER no. 15-151) was obtained prior to data collection, and the study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02725346). All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Barth J, Andrieu K, Fotiadis E, Hannink G, Barthelemy R, Saffarini M (2016) Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(7):2196–2204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Besl P, MacKay N (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bigliani L, Morrison D, April E (1986) The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans 10:228Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chahal J, Mall N, MacDonald P, Van Thiel G, Cole B, Romeo A, Verma N (2012) The role of subacromial decompression in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 28(5):720–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charbonnier C, Chagué S, Kolo FC, Chow JCK, Lädermann A (2014) A patient-specific measurement technique to model the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(7):715–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charbonnier C, Chagué S, Kolo FC, Lädermann A (2015) Shoulder motion during tennis serve: dynamic and radiological evaluation based on motion capture and magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Comput Assit Radiol Surg 10(8):1289–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charbonnier C, Lädermann A, Kevelham B, Chagué S, Hoffmeyer P, Holzer N (2018) Shoulder strengthening exercises adapted to specific shoulder pathologies can be selected using new simulation techniques: a pilot study. Int J Comput Assit Radiol Surg 13(2):321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chopp J, Dickerson C (2012) Resolving the contributions of fatigue-induced migration and scapular reorientation on the subacromial space: an orthopaedic geometric simulation analysis. Hum Mov Sci 31:448–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collin P, Matsumura N, Lädermann A, Denard P, Walch G (2014) Relationship between massive chronic rotator cuff tear pattern and loss of active shoulder range of motion. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(8):1195–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collin P, Yoshida M, Delarue A, Lucas C, Jossaume T, Lädermann A (2015) Evaluating postoperative rotator cuff healing: prospective comparison of MRI and ultrasound. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(6):S265–S268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Constant C, Murley A (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cunningham G, Lädermann A, Denard P, Kherad O, Burkhart S (2015) Correlation between American shoulder and elbow surgeons and single assessment numerical evaluation score after rotator cuff or SLAP repair. Arthroscopy 31(9):1688–1692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denard P, Lädermann A, Burkhart S (2011) Prevention and management of stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: systematic review and implications for rotator cuff healing. Arthroscopy 27(6):842–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fagelman M, Sartori M, Freedman K, Patwardhan A, Carandang G, Marra G (2007) Biomechanics of coracoacromial arch modification. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(1):101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Familiari F, Gonzalez-Zapata A, Ianno B, Galasso O, Gasparini G, McFarland E (2014) Is acromioplasty necessary in the setting of full-thickness rotator cuff tears? A systematic review. J Orthop Traumatol 16(3):167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frank J, Chahal J, Frank R, Cole B, Verma N, Romeo A (2014) The role of acromioplasty for rotator cuff problems. Orthop Clin N Am 45(2):219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerber C, Catanzaro S, Betz M, Ernstbrunner L (2017) Arthroscopic correction of the critical shoulder angle through lateral acromioplasty: a safe adjunct to rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.255
  18. 18.
    Goutallier D, Postel J, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin M (2016) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Graichen H, Hinterwimmer S, Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F (2005) Effect of abducting and adducting muscle activity on glenohumeral translation, scapular kinematics and subacromial space width in vivo. J Biomech 38(4):755–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katthagen J, Marchetti D, Tahal D, Turnbull T, Millett P (2016) The effects of arthroscopic lateral acromioplasty on the critical shoulder angle and the anterolateral deltoid origin: an anatomic cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 32(4):569–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koester M, George M, Kuhn J (2005) Shoulder impingement syndrome. Am J Med 118(5):452–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krekel P, de Bruin P, Valstar E, Post F, Rozing P, Botha C (2009) Evaluation of bone impingement prediction in pre-operative planning for shoulder arthroplasty. J Eng Med 223(7):813–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lädermann A, Denard P, Collin P (2015) Massive rotator cuff tears: definition and treatment. Int Orthop 39(12):2403–2414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee T, Black A, Tibone J, McMahon P (2001) Release of the coracoacromial ligament can lead to glenohumeral laxity: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 10(1):68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lippitt S, Harryman D, Matsen F (1993) A practical tool for function evaluation: the simple shoulder test. In: Matsen FAI, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ (eds) The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, pp 501–518Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maeseneer MD, Roy PV, Shahabpour M (2006) Normal MR imaging anatomy of the rotator cuff tendons, glenoid fossa, labrum, and ligaments of the shoulder. Radiol Clin N Am 44:479–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maurer A, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CWA, Wirth SH, Djahangiri A, Jost B, Gerber C (2012) Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(8):1096–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Michener L, McClure P, Karduna A (2003) Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Biomech 18(5):369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moor B, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh D, Sukthankar A, Gerber C (2013) Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint? A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. Bone Joint J 95B(7):935–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neer C (1972) Anterior acromioplasty for chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:41–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nyffeler R, Werner C, Sukthankar A, Schmid M, Gerber C (2006) Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(4):800–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:81–86Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Richards R, An K, Bigliani L, Friedman R, Gartsman G, Gristina A, Iannotti J, Mow V, Sidles J, Zuckerman J (1994) A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elb Surg 3(6):347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Röling M, Visser M, Oei E, Pilot P, Kleinrensink G, Bloem R (2015) A quantitative non-invasive assessment of femoroacetabular impingement with CT-based dynamic simulation—cadaveric validation study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16(1):50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Romeo A, Loutzenheiser T, Rhee Y, Sidles J, Harryman D, Matsen F (1998) The humeroscapular motion interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schmid J, Chênes C, Chagué S, Hoffmeyer P, Christofilopoulos P, Bernardoni M, Charbonnier C (2015) MyHip: supporting planning and surgical guidance for a better total hip arthroplasty: a pilot study. Int J Comput Assit Radiol Surg 10(10):1547–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schneider P, Eberly D (2003) Geometric tools for computer graphics. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shi L, Edwards T (2012) The role of acromioplasty for management of rotator Cuff problems: where is the evidence? Adv Orthop 2012:467571PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Song L, Miao L, Zhang P, Wang W (2016) Does concomitant acromioplasty facilitate arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears? A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Springerplus 5(1):685CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Spiegl U, Horan M, Smith S, Ho C, Millett P (2016) The critical shoulder angle is associated with rotator cuff tears and shoulder osteoarthritis and is better assessed with radiographs over MRI. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(7):2244–2251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Su W, Budoff J, Luo Z (2009) The effect of coracoacromial ligament excision and acromioplasty on superior and anterosuperior glenohumeral stability. Arthroscopy 25(1):13–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Timmons M, Lopes-Albers AD, Borgsmiller L, Zirker C, Ericksen J, Michener L (2013) Differences in scapular orientation, subacromial space and shoulder pain between the full can and empty can tests. Clin Biomech 28:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vitale M, Arons R, Hurwitz S, Ahmad C, Levine W (2010) The rising incidence of acromioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 92(9):1842–1850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Voisin J, Ropars M, Thomazeau H (2014) The human acromion viewed from an evolutionary perspective. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(8):S355–S360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Walch G, Vezeridis P, Boileau P, Deransart P, Chaoui J (2015) Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study. J Shoulder Elbo Surg 24(2):302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Website (Accessed July 2017) PDF3D. https://www.pdf3d.com/
  47. 47.
    Website (Accessed July 2017) Qt. https://www.qt.io/
  48. 48.
    Website (Accessed July 2017) Visualization toolkit. http://www.vtk.org/
  49. 49.
    Wiley A (1991) Superior humeral dislocation. A complication following decompression and debridement for rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 263:135–141Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wu G, van der Helm F, Veegerc H, Makhsouse M, Royf PV, Angling C, Nagelsh J, Kardunai A, McQuadej K, Wangk X, Wernerl F, Buchholzm B (2005) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 38:981–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caecilia Charbonnier
    • 1
  • Sylvain Chagué
    • 1
  • Bart Kevelham
    • 1
  • Delphine Preissmann
    • 2
  • Frank C. Kolo
    • 3
  • Olivier Rime
    • 4
  • Alexandre Lädermann
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Medical Research DepartmentArtanim FoundationMeyrinSwitzerland
  2. 2.Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of PsychiatryLausanne University HospitalPrillySwitzerland
  3. 3.Rive Droite Radiology CenterGenevaSwitzerland
  4. 4.Division of PhysiotherapyLa Tour HospitalMeyrinSwitzerland
  5. 5.Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma SurgeryLa Tour HospitalMeyrinSwitzerland
  6. 6.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  7. 7.Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of SurgeryGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations