Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postmortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) and traditional autopsy in cases of sudden cardiac death due to coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • ETHICS AND FORENSIC RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Several studies have been performed to assess the efficacy of postmortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) in solving cases of sudden cardiac death, even in comparison with the traditional autopsy. However, the results were often inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, a global discussion on the subject through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis is necessary.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed was performed up to April 23, 2018. Studies exploring the role of PMCTA in cases of sudden cardiac death and the accuracy of this method in diagnosing the cause of death compared to traditional autopsy were included.

Results

The overall sensitivity and specificity of the seven included studies, using conventional autopsy as a reference standard, were 92% and 95%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were, respectively, 20.76 (95% CI 1.16–370.2) and 0.08 (95% CI 0.03–0.17), showing that PMCTA represents a strong indicator of the posttest probability of disease. The diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve were, respectively, 261.54 (95% CI 1.87–5760.53) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90–0.95), indicating a high diagnostic power of the test.

Conclusion

PMCTA demonstrated a high accuracy in the diagnosis of parietal and luminal coronary changes but was less effective in detecting myocardial ischemia and necrosis. Therefore, the only radiological investigation is often insufficient to determine the cause of sudden death and the conventional autopsy remains the gold standard. However, PMCTA can improve the performance of the autopsy, serving as an aid and guide in the sampling phase for histopathological investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Priori SG, Aliot E, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Bossaert L, Breithardt G, Brugada P, Camm AJ, Cappato R, Cobbe SM, Di Mario C, Maron BJ, McKenna WJ, Pedersen AK, Ravens U, Schwartz PJ, Trusz-Gluza M, Vardas P, Wellens HJ, Zipes DP (2001) Task force on sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 22:1374–1450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayashi M, Shimizu W, Albert C (2015) The spectrum of epidemiology underlying sudden cardiac death. Circ Res 116(12):1887–1906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Basso C, Aguilera B, Banner J, Cohle S, d’Amati G, de Gouveia RH, di Gioia C, Fabre A, Gallagher PJ, Leone O, Lucena J, Mitrofanova L, Molina P, Parsons S, Rizzo S, Sheppard MN, Mier MPS, Kim Suvarna S, Thiene G, van der Wal A, Vink A, Michaud K (2017) Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death: 2017 update from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. Virchows Arch 6:691–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton JL, Underwood J (2007) Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 369:1471–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Ross S, Buck U, Naether S, Vock P (2008) Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the virtopsy and similar projects. Eur Radiol 18(2):273–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Westphal SE, Apitzsch JC, Penzkofer T, Kuhl CK, Mahnken AH, Knüchel R (2014) Contrast-enhanced postmortem computed tomography in clinical pathology: enhanced value of 20 clinical autopsies. Hum Pathol 45(9):1813–1823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vullo A, Panebianco V, Cannavale G, Aromatario M, Cipolloni L, Frati P, Santurro A, Vullo F, Catalano C, Fineschi V (2016) Post-mortem magnetic resonance foetal imaging: a study of morphological correlation with conventional autopsy and histopathological findings. Radiol Med 121(11):847–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lundström C, Persson A, Ross S, Ljung P, Lindholm S, Gyllensvärd F, Ynnerman A (2012) State-of-the-art of visualization in post-mortem imaging. APMIS 120:316–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolliger SA, Thali MJ (2015) Imaging and virtual autopsy: looking back and forward. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370:1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pomara C, Fineschi V, Scalzo G, Guglielmi G (2009) Virtopsy versus digital autopsy: virtuous autopsy. Radiol Med 114:1367–1382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Marco E, Vacchiano G, Frati P, La Russa R, Santurro A, Scopetti M, Guglielmi G, Fineschi V (2018) Evolution of post-mortem coronary imaging: from selective coronary arteriography to post-mortem CT-angiography and beyond. Radiol Med 123(5):351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saunders SL, Morgan B, Raj V, Rutty GN (2011) Post-mortem computed tomography angiography: past, present and future. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 7:271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ (2006) Virtopsy: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy. Radiographics 26:1305–1333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Plos Med 6(7):e.1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberati A (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151(4):W65–W94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leeflang M (2014) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(2):105–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim K, Lee J, Choi S, Huh J, Park S (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part I. General guidance and tips. Korean J Radiol 16(6):1175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee J, Kim K, Choi S, Huh J, Park S (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part II. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol 16(6):1188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Z, Yao Z, Li C, Liu X, Chen H, Gao C (2013) A step-by-step guide to the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic test accuracy evaluations. Br J Cancer 108(11):2299–2303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bolliger S, Filograna L, Spendlove D, Thali M, Dirnhofer S, Ross S (2010) Postmortem imaging-guided biopsy as an adjuvant to minimally invasive autopsy with CT and postmortem angiography: a feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1051–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC (2011) Diagnosis of coronary artery disease using minimally invasive autopsy: evaluation of a novel method of post-mortem coronary CT angiography. Clin Radiol 66:645–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ross SG, Thali MJ, Bolliger S, Germerott T, Ruder TD, Flach PM (2012) Sudden death after chest pain: feasibility of virtual autopsy with postmortem CT angiography and biopsy. Radiology 264:250–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Michaud K, Grabherr S, Doenz F, Mangin P (2012) Evaluation of postmortem MDCT and MDCT-angiography for the investigation of sudden cardiac death related to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:1807–1822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morgan B, Biggs M, Barber J, Raj V, Amoroso J, Hollingbury F, Robinson C, Rutty G (2012) Accuracy of targeted post-mortem computed tomography coronary angiography compared to assessment of serial histological sections. Int J Legal Med 127(4):809–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Inokuchi G, Yajima D, Hayakawa M, Motomura A, Chiba F, Torimitsu S, Makino Y, Iwase H (2013) The utility of postmortem computed tomography selective coronary angiography in parallel with autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 9(4):506–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Polacco M, Sedati P, Arena V, Pascali VL, Zobel BB, Oliva A, Rossi R (2014) Visualization of myocardial infarction by post-mortem single-organ coronary computed tomography: a feasibility study. Int J Legal Med 129(3):517–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grabherr S, Grimm J, Dominguez A, Vanhaebost J, Mangin P (2014) Advances in post-mortem CT-angiography. Br J Radiol 87(1036):20130488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Turillazzi E, Frati P, Pascale N, Pomara C, Grilli G, Viola RV, Fineschi V (2016) Multi-phase post-mortem CT-angiography: a pathologic correlation study on cardiovascular sudden death. J Geriatr Cardiol 13:855–865

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Guidi B, Aquaro GD, Gesi M, Emdin M, Di Paolo M (2018) Postmortem cardiac magnetic resonance in sudden cardiac death. Heart Fail Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-018-9705-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Heinemann A, Vogel H, Heller M, Tzikas A, Püschel K (2015) Investigation of medical intervention with fatal outcome: the impact of post-mortem CT and CT angiography. Radiol Med 120(9):835–845

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Takei H, Sano R, Takahashi Y, Takahashi K, Kominato Y, Tokue H, Shimada T, Awata S, Hirasawa S, Ohta N (2018) Usefulness of coronary postmortem computed tomography angiography to detect lesions in the coronary artery and myocardium in cases of sudden death. Leg Med (Tokyo) 30:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vogel B, Heinemann A, Tzikas A, Poodendaen C, Gulbins H, Reichenspurner H, Püschel K, Vogel H (2013) Post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) and PMCT-angiography after cardiac surgery Possibilities and limits. Arch Med Sad Kryminol 63(3):155–171

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vogel B, Heinemann A, Gehl A, Hasegawa I, Höpker WW, Poodendaen C, Tzikas A, Gulbins H, Reichenspurner H, Püschel K, Vogel H (2013) Post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) and PMCT-angiography after transvascular cardiac interventions. Arch Med Sad Kryminol 63(3):255–266

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee H, Park H, Cha JG, Lee S, Yang K (2015) Myocardial contrast defect associated with thrombotic coronary occlusion: pre-autopsy diagnosis of a cardiac death with post-mortem CT angiography. Korean J Radiol 16:1024–1028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Donnell C (2010) An image of sudden death: utility of routine postmortem computed tomography scanning in medico-legal autopsy practice. Diagn Histopathol 16:552–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rüegger CM, Bartsch C, Martinez RM, Ross S, Bolliger SA, Koller B, Held L, Bruder E, Bode PK, Caduff R, Frey B, Schäffer L, Bucher HU (2014) Minimally invasive, imaging guided virtual autopsy compared to conventional autopsy in foetal, newborn and infant cases: study protocol for the paediatric virtual autopsy trial. BMC Pediatr 14:15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Aghayev E, Thali MJ, Sonnenschein M, Jackowski C, Dirnhofer R, Vock P (2007) Post-mortem tissue sampling using computed tomography guidance. Forensic Sci Int 166:199–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ebert LC, Ptacek W, Naether S, Fürst M, Ross S, Buck U, Weber S, Thali M (2010) Virtobot–a multi-functional robotic system for 3D surface scanning and automatic post mortem biopsy. Int J Med Robot 6:18–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Busardò FP, Frati P, Santurro A, Zaami S, Fineschi V (2015) Errors and malpractice lawsuits in radiology: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiol Med 120(9):779–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Grabherr S, Heinemann A, Vogel H, Rutty G, Morgan B, Woźniak K, Dedouit F, Fischer F, Lochner S, Wittig H, Guglielmi G, Eplinius F, Michaud K, Palmiere C, Chevallier C, Mangin P, Grimm JM (2018) Postmortem CT angiography compared with autopsy: a forensic multicenter study. Radiology 1:170559

    Google Scholar 

  41. Poulsen K, Simonsen J (2007) Computed tomography as routine in connection with medico-legal autopsies. For Sci Int 171(2–3):190–197

    Google Scholar 

  42. Flach PM, Thali MJ, Germerott T (2014) Times have changed! Forensic radiology-a new challenge for radiology and forensic pathology. Am J Roentgenol 202(4):W325–W334

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to manuscript drafting and critical discussion and approved the definitive version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vittorio Fineschi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. All accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

La Russa, R., Catalano, C., Di Sanzo, M. et al. Postmortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) and traditional autopsy in cases of sudden cardiac death due to coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiol med 124, 109–117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0943-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0943-y

Keywords

Navigation