Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From Experiment to Theory: What Can We Learn from Growth Curves?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finding an appropriate functional form to describe population growth based on key properties of a described system allows making justified predictions about future population development. This information can be of vital importance in all areas of research, ranging from cell growth to global demography. Here, we use this connection between theory and observation to pose the following question: what can we infer about intrinsic properties of a population (i.e., degree of heterogeneity, or dependence on external resources) based on which growth function best fits its growth dynamics? We investigate several nonstandard classes of multi-phase growth curves that capture different stages of population growth; these models include hyperbolic–exponential, exponential–linear, exponential–linear–saturation growth patterns. The constructed models account explicitly for the process of natural selection within inhomogeneous populations. Based on the underlying hypotheses for each of the models, we identify whether the population that it best fits by a particular curve is more likely to be homogeneous or heterogeneous, grow in a density-dependent or frequency-dependent manner, and whether it depends on external resources during any or all stages of its development. We apply these predictions to cancer cell growth and demographic data obtained from the literature. Our theory, if confirmed, can provide an additional biomarker and a predictive tool to complement experimental research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almog N, Henke V, Flores L, Hlatky L, Kung AL, Wright RD, Berger R, Hutchinson L, Naumov GN, Bender E et al (2006) Prolonged dormancy of human liposarcoma is associated with impaired tumor angiogenesis. FASEB J 20:947–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzekry S, Lamont C, Beheshti A, Tracz A, Ebos JM, Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P (2014) Classical mathematical models for description and prediction of experimental tumor growth. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biebricher CK, Eigen M, William C, Gardiner J (1983) Kinetics of RNA replication. Biochemistry 22:2544–2559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biebricher CK, Eigen M, Gardiner WC Jr (1985) Kinetics of RNA replication: competition and selection among self-replicating RNA species. Biochemistry 24:6550–6560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisken C (2013) Progesterone signalling in breast cancer: a neglected hormone coming into the limelight. Nat Rev Cancer 13:385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C-H, Qiu J, O’Sullivan D, Buck MD, Noguchi T, Curtis JD, Chen Q, Gindin M, Gubin MM, van der Windt GJ et al (2015) Metabolic competition in the tumor microenvironment is a driver of cancer progression. Cell 162:1229–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Kyle MM, Smith MS, Nagy JD (2007) Biological stoichiometry in human cancer. PLoS ONE 2:e1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1958) The genetic theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman J, Kalluri R (2004) Cancer without disease. Nature 427:787–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies RJ, Gatenby RA (2015) Metabolism and its sequelae in cancer evolution and therapy. Cancer J 21:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heesterbeek H, Anderson RM, Andreasen V, Bansal S, De Angelis D, Dye C, Eames KT, Edmunds WJ, Frost SD, Funk S, Hollingsworth TD (2015) Modeling infectious disease dynamics in the complex landscape of global health. Science 347(6227):aaa4339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jozwik KM, Carroll JS (2012) Pioneer factors in hormone-dependent cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 12:381–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapitza SP (1996) The phenomenological theory of world population growth. Phys Uspekhi 39:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapitza SP (2006) Global population blow-up and after. Global Marshall Plan Initiative, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Karev GP (2005) Dynamics of inhomogeneous populations and global demography models. J Biol Syst 13:83–104

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karev GP (2010) On mathematical theory of selection: continuous time population dynamics. J Math Biol 60:107–129

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karev GP (2014) Non-linearity and heterogeneity in modeling of population dynamics. Math Biosci 258:85–92

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karev G, Kareva I (2014) Replicator equations and models of biological populations and communities. Math Model Nat Phenom 7(2):32–59

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva I (2013) Biological stoichiometry in tumor micro-environments. PLoS ONE 8:e51844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva I (2015) Cancer ecology: niche construction, keystone species, ecological succession, and ergodic theory. Biol Theory 10:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva I (2016) Primary and metastatic tumor dormancy as a result of population heterogeneity. Biol Direct 11:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva I, Hahnfeldt P (2013) The emerging “hallmarks” of metabolic reprogramming and immune evasion: distinct or linked? Cancer Res 73:2737–2742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva I, Abou-Slaybi A, Dodd O, Dashevsky O, Klement GL (2016) Normal wound healing and tumor angiogenesis as a game of competitive inhibition. PLoS ONE 11(12):e0166655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marusyk A, Polyak K (2010) Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Rev Cancer 1805:105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marusyk A, Almendro V, Polyak K (2012) Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? Nat Rev Cancer 12:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naumov GN, Bender E, Zurakowski D, Kang S-Y, Sampson D, Flynn E, Watnick RS, Straume O, Akslen LA, Folkman J et al (2006) A model of human tumor dormancy: an angiogenic switch from the nonangiogenic phenotype. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg M, Corradini MG (2011) Microbial growth curves: what the models tell us and what they cannot. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 51(10):917–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers MS, Novak K, Zurakowski D, Cryan LM, Blois A, Lifshits E, Bø TH, Oyan AM, Bender ER, Lampa M et al (2014) Spontaneous reversion of the angiogenic phenotype to a nonangiogenic and dormant state in human tumors. Mol Cancer Res 12:754–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rönn MM, Wolf EE, Chesson H, Menzies NA, Galer K, Gorwitz R, Gift T, Hsu K, Salomon JA (2017) The use of mathematical models of chlamydia transmission to address public health policy questions: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis 44(5):278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster P (2011) Mathematical modeling of evolution. Solved and open problems. Theory Biosci 130:71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring LM, Gupta A, Reynolds KL, Gadd MA, Ellisen LW, Isakoff SJ, Moy B, Bardia A (2016) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2:1477–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstikhina OS, Gavrikov VL, Khlebopros RG, Okhonin VA (2013) Demographic transition as reflected by fertility and life expectancy: typology of countries. J Sib Fed Univ Humanit Soc Sci 6:890–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoularis A, Wallace J (2002) Analysis of logistic growth models. Math Biosci 179(1):21–55

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verguet S, Johri M, Morris SK, Gauvreau CL, Jha P, Jit M (2015) Controlling measles using supplemental immunization activities: a mathematical model to inform optimal policy. Vaccine 33(10):1291–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Forster H, Mora PM, Amiot LW (1960) Doomsday: friday, 13 november, A.D. 2026. Science 132:1291–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Ignatiadis M, Sengstag T, Schutz F et al (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10:R65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Senthil Kabilan for his invaluable help with parameter fitting, the anonymous reviewer and Dr. Micha Peleg for their thoughtful and valuable comments and suggestions. This research was partially supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NCBI, NIH (to GK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgy Karev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (xlsx 13 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (pdf 106 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kareva, I., Karev, G. From Experiment to Theory: What Can We Learn from Growth Curves?. Bull Math Biol 80, 151–174 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-017-0347-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-017-0347-5

Keywords

Navigation