Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Population Thinking Instruction in High Schools: a Public Health Intervention with Triple Benefits

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

America faces a series of intersecting problems that relate to health inequities, failing schools, and an inadequate science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) workforce, particularly in cities and among low-income Black and Latino youth. Here, we propose a solution, namely reforming secondary school education to include mandatory exposure to population thinking instruction to address these overlapping issues. Public health education has expanded in recent decades in undergraduate education, though it has yet to become an integral component of high school curricula. In this paper, we make the case that all youth should gain exposure to the skills of population thinking through public health education initiated in high school. We further provide a rationale for this approach drawn from multiple youth development frameworks and the community schools movement for honing youth critical thinking skills and problem solving relating to individual and community health, policy, and activism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

STEM:

Science, technology, engineering, and math

References

  1. Fine PEM, Goldacre BM, Haines A. Epidemiology—a science for the people. Lancet. 2013;381(9874):1249–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bracken MB. Epidemiology as a liberal art: from graduate school to middle school, an unfulfilled agenda. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(3):171–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hollm-Delgado MG. Educating epidemiologists throughout the life course: moving from conversation to action. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(3):169–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keyes KM, Galea S. Current practices in teaching introductory epidemiology: how we got here, where to go. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(7):661–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hlaing WM. Regarding “educating epidemiologists”. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(7):558–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. St. George DMM, Chukhina M, Kaelin MA. Training teachers to teach epidemiology in middle and high schools. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017;38(1):65–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cordell RL, Cordeira KL, Cohen LP, Bensyl DM. Building the pipeline: programs to introduce middle school, high school, medical, and veterinary students to careers in epidemiology and public health. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27(11):752–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Agostino EM. Public health education: teaching epidemiology in high school classrooms. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(3):324–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Balfanz R, Legters N (2004) Locating the dropout crisis. Which high schools produce the nation’s dropouts? Where are they located? Who attends them? Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk. (Report 70)

  10. Museus SD, Palmer RT, Davis RJ, Maramba D (2011) Factors in K–12 education that influence the success of racial and ethnic minority students in the STEM circuit. In: Racial and ethnic minority student success in STEM education: ASHE higher education report. Vol 36(6). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3606

  11. Kiviniemi MT, Mackenzie SL. Framing undergraduate public health education as liberal education: who are we training our students to be and how do we do that? Front Public Health. 2017;5(9):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tsui E, Bylander K, Cho M, Maybank A, Freudenberg N. Engaging youth in food activism in New York City: lessons learned from a youth organization, health department, and university partnership. J Urban Health. 2012;89(5):809–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fraser DW. Epidemiology as a liberal art. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:309–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bass SB, Guttmacher S, Nezami E. Who will keep the public healthy? The case for undergraduate public health education: a review of three programs. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(1):6–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer K, Glenn D (2009) 5 college majors on the rise. Chron High Educ August 31. https://www.chronicle.com/article/5-College-Majors-On-the-Rise/48207. Accessed 28 May 2019.

  16. Leider JP, Castrucci BC, Plepys CM, Blakely C, Burke E, Sprague JB. On academics: characterizing the growth of the undergraduate public health major: US, 1992–2012. Public Health Rep. 2015;130(1):104–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. Data center: the source for public health education data. https://www.aspph.org/connect/data-center/. Updated 2018. Accessed November 29, 2018.

  18. Marantz PR. Epidemiology 101: toward an educated citizenry. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(3):264–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stroup DF, Thacker SB. Epidemiology and education: using public health for teaching mathematics and science. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(3):283–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wallerstein NB, Duran B. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7(3):312–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arcidiacono P, Aucejo EM, Hotz VJ. University differences in the graduation of minorities in STEM fields: evidence from California. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106(3):525–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hurtado S, Newman CB, Tran MC, Chang MJ. Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: insights from a national project. New Dir Inst Res. 2010;(148):5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu YJ. Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: a study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Res High Educ. 2008;49(7):607–24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson DL, Starobin SS, Laanan FS. The shared experiences: facilitating successful transfer of women and underrepresented minorities in STEM fields. N Dir High Educ. 2013;(162):69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Freire P. Education for critical consciousness, vol. 1. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Delp L, Brown M, Domenzain A. Fostering youth leadership to address workplace and community environmental health issues: a university-school-community partnership. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(3):270–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Flicker S, Maley O, Ridgley A, Biscope S, Lombardo C, Skinner HA. E-PAR: using technology and participatory action research to engage youth in health promotion. Action Res. 2008;6(3):285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang CC. Youth participation in photovoice as a strategy for community change. J Community Pract. 2006;14(2):147–61.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Strack RW, Magill C, McDonagh K. Engaging youth through photovoice. Health Promot Pract. 2004;5(1):49–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cole AG. Expanding the field: revisiting environmental education principles through multidisciplinary frameworks. J Environ Educ. 2007;38(2):35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gavin LE, Catalano RF, Markham CM. Positive youth development as a strategy to promote adolescent sexual and reproductive health. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(3):S1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shaman J, Knowlton K. The need for climate and health education. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:S66–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Phelan JC, Link BG, Tehranifar P. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: theory, evidence, and policy implications. J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51(1_suppl):S28–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Frohlich KL, Potvin L. Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(2):216–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. English PB, Richardson MJ, Garzón-Galvis C. From crowdsourcing to extreme citizen science: participatory research for environmental health. Ann Rev Public Health. 2018;39:335–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Coburn J, editor. Street science: community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ballard HL, Dixon CG, Harris EM. Youth-focused citizen science: examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biol Conserv. 2017;208:65):75.

    Google Scholar 

  38. National Research Council, editor. A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  39. National Research Council (2013) Appendix F: science and engineering practices in the NGSS. In: The next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press

  40. Wallerstein N, Bernstein E. Empowerment education: Freire’s ideas adapted to health education. Health Educ Behav. 1988;15(4):379–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Novak JD. Meaningful learning: the essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Sci Educ. 2002;86(4):548–71.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ritchhart R, Church M, Morrison K. Making thinking visible. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Duckworth E. The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Diamond C, Freudenberg N. Community schools: a public health opportunity to reverse urban cycles of disadvantage. J Urban Health. 2016;93(6):923–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Harkavy I. Engaging urban universities as anchor institutions for health equity. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(12):2155–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Jackson MJ, Helms MM. Student perceptions of hybrid courses: measuring and interpreting quality. J Educ Bus. 2008;84(1):7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pellegrino JW (2006) Rethinking and redesigning curriculum, instruction and assessment: what contemporary research and theory suggests. Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce, Chicago. 1–15. http://www.skillscommission.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Rethinking-and-Redesigning.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2019.

  48. Riga F, Winterbottom M, Harris E, Newby L (2017) Inquiry-based science education. In: K. S. Taber & B. Akpan, ed. Science education: an international course companion. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers; 247–261.

  49. Marmot M. Post-truth and science. The Lancet. 2017;389(10068):497–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Agostino, E.M., Freudenberg, N. Population Thinking Instruction in High Schools: a Public Health Intervention with Triple Benefits. J Urban Health 96, 902–911 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00383-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00383-z

Keywords

Navigation