Investigating the Support Networks for Mothers of a High-density Public Housing Community and the Effects of Housing Closures on These Support Systems

  • Jennifer Smith
  • Soyang Kwon
  • Maryann Mason
  • Karen Sheehan
Article

Abstract

Over the past few decades, public housing initiatives have focused on the decentralization of poverty by replacing high-density public housing (HDPH) models with lower-density, mixed-income models. This action has resulted in the displacement of families who had lived in these developments for generations. In past studies, public housing residents have been shown to have stronger social ties than those living in other types of assisted housing. Research on the dismemberment of US public housing has demonstrated a “root shock” or disruption in the support infrastructure in these resource-limited communities. The purpose of this study was to use intergenerational analysis to analyze support systems of mothers in a low-income community and to investigate how the dismemberment of a Chicago HDPH community, Cabrini Green, affected parenting experiences and support infrastructure. Two generations of the former HDPH community were interviewed: (Gen1) mothers who raised their children in Cabrini Green and (Gen2) their daughter(s) who were raised in Cabrini Green but who now raise their children elsewhere. Interviews were analyzed for common themes in relation to mental health, social support networks, and parenting experiences. Four main components of parenting support were identified: familial support, father of child support, community support, and institutional support. Interviews suggest that the closing of Cabrini-Green high-rise buildings impacted relative contributions from specific components of mothers’ support infrastructure, particularly community and institutional support. Mothers with support void in one component of support had better outcomes if they had the reserve to compensate by increasing one or more other areas of support. Programs that foster other sources of parenting support during and after public housing closures may help to improve outcomes for mothers and their families. By analyzing the experiences of mothers of both generations, we also gain insight into how experiences of motherhood and support systems compared before and after Cabrini Green’s dissolution as well as insight into the participants’ views on the impact of the housing closing on the parenting experience.

Keywords

Cabrini Green Chicago High-density public housing Parenting Motherhood 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago for their support of this project

References

  1. 1.
    Schumacher B, Bezalel R. 70 acres in Chicago. USA: Cabrini Green [DVD]; 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fullilove M. Root shock: how tearing up city neighborhoods hurts America and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Ballantine Books; 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manzo L, Kleit R, Couch D. Moving once is like having your house on fire three times: the experience of place and displacement among residents of a public housing site. Urban Stud. 2008;45(9):1855–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keene D, Geronimus A. Community-based support among African American public housing residents. J Urban Health. 2011;88(1):41–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kawachi I, Kennedy B, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(9):1491–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kouvonen A, Oksanen T, Vahtera J, Stafford M, Wilkinson R, Schneider J, et al. Low workplace social capital as a predictor of depression. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(10):1143–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poortinga W. Social relations or social capital? Individual and community health effects of bonding social capital. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(1):255–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaumer E, Jacobowitz A, Brooks-Gunn J. Building ties: the social networks of affordable-housing residents. Cityscape. 2014;16(3):47–68.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greene D, Tehranifar P, Hernandez-Cordero L, Fullilove MI. Used to cry every day: a model of the family process of managing displacement. J Urban Health. 2011;88(3):401–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chicago Youth Programs Web Site. http://www.chicagoyouthprograms.org. Updated 2016. Accessed October 1, 2016.
  11. 11.
    Ungar M. Community resilience for youth and families: facilitative physical and social capital in contexts of adversity. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(9):1742–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clampet-Lundquist S. HOPE VI relocation: moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Housing Policy Debate. 2004;15(2):415–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curley A. Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston. J Soc Pers Relat. 2009;26(2):227–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations