Transitions between Housing States among Urban Homeless Adults: a Bayesian Markov Model
The purpose of this study is to explore how marginalization, substance abuse, and service utilization influence the transitions between streets, shelters, and housed states over the course of 2 years in a population of urban homeless adults. Survey responses from three yearly interviews of 400 homeless adults were matched with administrative services data collected from regional health, mental health, and housing service providers. To estimate the rates of transition between housed, street, and shelter status, a multi-state Markov model was developed within a Bayesian framework. These transition rates were then regressed on a set of independent variables measuring demographics, marginalization, substance abuse, and service utilization. Transitions from housing to shelters or streets were associated with not being from the local area, not having friends or family to count on, and unemployment. Pending charges and a recent history of being robbed were associated with the shelters-to-streets transition. Remaining on the streets was uniquely associated with engagement in “shadow work” and, surprisingly, a high use of routine services. These findings paint a picture of unique and separate processes for different types of housing transitions. These results reinforce the importance of focusing interventions on the needs of these unique housing transitions, paying particular attention to prior housing patterns, substance abuse, and the different ways that homeless adults are marginalized in our society.
KeywordsHomeless Adult Housing Bayesian Substance abuse
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA10713 [North, Pollio], DA025782-01 [Alexander-Eitzman]).
- 6.Baggett TP, Hwang SW, O’Connell JJ, Porneala BC, Stringfellow EJ, Orav EJ, et al. Mortality among homeless adults in Boston. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(3):189–95. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1604.
- 9.Fitzpatrick S, Johnsen S, White M. Multiple exclusion homelessness in the UK: key patterns and intersections. Soc Policy Soc. 2011;10(4):501–512. http://0-journals.cambridge.org.wncln.wncln.org/abstract_S147474641100025X. Accessed June 25, 2014.
- 10.Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao SY, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of Dsm-iii-R psychiatric-disorders in the United-States—results from the National-Comorbidity-Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51(1):8–19.Google Scholar
- 11.Robins LN, Cottler LB, Compton W, Bucholz K, North CS, Rourke KM. Diagnostic Interview Schedule for the DSM-IV (DIS-IV). St. Louis, MO: Washington University in St. Louis; 2000.Google Scholar
- 12.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Author; 1994.Google Scholar
- 17.Gelman A. Bayesian Data Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 18.Gill J. Bayesian Methods: a Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL; 2002.Google Scholar
- 19.Frees EW. Longitudinal and Panel Data: Analysis and Applications in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 21.Van Buuren S, Oudshoorn C. Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations: MICE V1.0 User’s Manual. TNO Prevention Center: Leiden, The Netherlands; 2000.Google Scholar
- 22.Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996;5(3):299–314.Google Scholar