Bringing Healthy Retail to Urban “Food Swamps”: a Case Study of CBPR-Informed Policy and Neighborhood Change in San Francisco
In urban “food swamps” like San Francisco’s Tenderloin, the absence of full-service grocery stores and plethora of corner stores saturated with tobacco, alcohol, and processed food contribute to high rates of chronic disease. We explore the genesis of the Tenderloin Healthy Corner Store Coalition, its relationship with health department and academic partners, and its contributions to the passage and implementation of a healthy retail ordinance through community-based participatory research (CBPR), capacity building, and advocacy. The healthy retail ordinance incentivizes small stores to increase space for healthy foods and decrease tobacco and alcohol availability. Through Yin’s multi-method case study analysis, we examined the partnership’s processes and contributions to the ordinance within the framework of Kingdon’s three-stage policymaking model. We also assessed preliminary outcomes of the ordinance, including a 35% increase in produce sales and moderate declines in tobacco sales in the first four stores participating in the Tenderloin, as well as a “ripple effect,” through which non-participating stores also improved their retail environments. Despite challenges, CBPR partnerships led by a strong community coalition concerned with bedrock issues like food justice and neighborhood inequities in tobacco exposure may represent an important avenue for health equity-focused research and its translation into practice.
KeywordsTobacco Community-based participatory research Health inequities Healthy retail Corner stores Small stores Municipal health policy Nutrition Food swamp Food environment
The authors gratefully acknowledge our partners at the Tenderloin Healthy Corner Store Coalition and, particularly, the Food Justice Leaders, without whom this work would not have been possible. We thank, as well, the Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation, the San Francisco Department of Public Health, the SF Office of Economic and Workforce Development, and Sutti & Associates. Particular thanks are due to Gladis Chavez, Susana Hennessey-Lavery, Norval Hickman, Phillip Gardiner, Sandra Witt, Judi Larsen, and Anthony Iton for their belief in and support of this work.
This research was supported by the University of California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP) grant #23AT-0008 and a gift from The California Endowment. JF’s work was supported in part by the American Heart Association grant #14POST20140055 and the National Institute Of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number #K01DK113068. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
- 1.Farley TA, Sykes R. See no junk food, buy no junk food. New York Times, 2015; Opinion.Google Scholar
- 4.Minkler M, Falbe J, Lavery Hennessey S, Estrada J, Thayer R. Improving food security and tobacco control through policy-focused CBPR. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2018.Google Scholar
- 5.Harder and Company Community Research. Community Health Status Assessment: City and County of San Francisco. Prepared for: San Francisco Department of Public Health. 2012. https://www.sfdph.org/dph/hc/HCAgen/HCAgen2016/May%2017/2016CHNA-2.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2017.
- 6.U.S. Census Buereau. 2011-2015 5-year American community survey. (San Francisco overall and census tracts 122.01-125.02). Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/. Accessed October 12, 2017.
- 8.Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers; 1995.Google Scholar
- 9.Bardach E, Patashnik EM. A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: CQ Press; 2016.Google Scholar
- 10.Birkland TA. An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts and models of public policy making. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2014.Google Scholar
- 13.Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.Google Scholar
- 14.South East Food Access. SEFA Retail Standards for Health and Sustainability. Available at: http://southeastfoodaccess.org/138. Accessed September 9, 2017.
- 16.Butler D, Aboelata M, Cohen L, Spilker S. Advancing health equity in tobacco control: summit proceedings. Paper presented at: Health Equity Summit. 2013; Sacramento, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/CTCB/CDPH%20Document%20Library/Policy/HealthEquity/HealthEquitySum-Web.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2017.
- 17.Weinfield NS, Mills G, Borger C, et al. Hunger in america 2014: national report prepared for feeding America. Westat and the Urban Institute. http://help.feedingamerica.org/HungerInAmerica/hunger-in-america-2014-fullreport.pdf. 2014. Accessed 20 June 2017.
- 18.Estrada J, Mathews G. Finding the good apples in the Tenderloin: Tenderloin youth and new community coalition launch healthy retail program. Unpublished press release., 2012.Google Scholar
- 20.Gomez A, Loresca E, Myer F, Payan K, Sanseau E, Selpides P. Healthy foods at the corner store: a community project by the Tenderloin Healthy Corner Store Coalition (Unpublished report for the PRIME program). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Joint Medical Program; 2013.Google Scholar
- 21.Kim J. Supervisor Jane Kim, District 6: Newsletter Archive. Available at: http://sfbos.org/supervisor-kim-newletter-archive. Accessed September 9, 2017.
- 22.Hagan E, Rubin V. Economic and community development outcomes of healthy food retail. PolicyLink: Oakland, CA; 2013.Google Scholar
- 23.McDaniel PA, Minkler M, Juachon L, Thayer R, Estrada J, Falbe J. Merchant attitudes toward a healthy food retailer incentive program in a low-income San Francisco neighborhood. International Quarterly of Community Health Education. (in press).Google Scholar
- 30.Guthrie K, Louie J, Foster CC. The challenge of assessing policy and advocacy activities: moving from theory to practice. Los Angeles: The California Endowment; 2006.Google Scholar
- 32.Minkler M, Garcia A, Rubin V, Wallerstein N. Community-based participatory research: a strategy for building healthy communities and promoting health through policy change. PolicyLink: Oakland; 2012.Google Scholar