Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using Network and Spatial Data to Better Target Overdose Prevention Strategies in Rural Appalachia

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This analysis uses network and spatial data to identify optimal individuals to target with overdose prevention interventions in rural Appalachia. Five hundred and three rural persons who use drugs were recruited to participate in the Social Networks among Appalachian People Study (2008–2010). Interviewer-administered surveys collected information on demographic characteristics, risk behaviors (including overdose history), network members, and residential addresses. We restricted the sample to individuals with at least one confirmed relationship to another study participant (N = 463). Using dyadic analyses (N = 1428 relationships), we identified relationship-level correlates of relationships with network members who have previously overdosed. We then examined individual- and network-level factors associated with (1) having at least one first-degree alter (i.e., network member) with a prior overdose and (2) each additional network member with a prior overdose (N = 463 study participants). Overall, 28% of the sample had previously overdosed and 57% were one-degree away from someone who previously overdosed. Relationships with those who had overdosed were characterized by closer residential proximity. Those with at least one network member who previously overdosed were more geographically central and occupied more central network positions. Further, the number of network members with an overdose history increased with decreasing distance to the town center, increasing network centrality, and prior enrollment in an alcohol detox program. Because fatal overdoses can be prevented through bystander intervention, these findings suggest that strategies that target more central individuals (both geographically and based on their network positions) and those who have previously enrolled in alcohol detox programs with overdose prevention training and naloxone may optimize intervention reach and have the potential to curb overdose fatalities in this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Injury Prevention & Control: Data & Statistics (WISQARSTM) 2014 (Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_injury_deaths_unintentional_injury_2014_1040w740h.gif). Accessed March 7, 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_injury_deaths_unintentional_injury_2014_1040w740h.gif.

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999-2016. National Center for Health Statistics 2017. Available at::https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db294.htm. Accessed 21 Dec 2017.

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC reports rising rates of drug overdose deaths in rural areas. CDC 24/7: Saving Lives, Protecting People 2017. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1019-rural-overdose-deaths.html. Accessed 19 Oct 2018.

  4. Martins SS, Sampson L, Cerdá M, Galea S. Worldwide prevalence and trends in unintentional drug overdose: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(11):e29–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Warner M, Chen LH, Makuc DM. Increase in fatal poisonings involving opioid analgesics in the United States, 1999-2006. NCHS Data Brief. 2009;(22):1–8.

  6. Paulozzi LJ, Xi Y. Recent changes in drug poisoning mortality in the United States by urban-rural status and by drug type. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(10):997–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Havens JR, Oser CB, Leukefeld CG, Webster JM, Martin SS, O’Connell DJ, et al. Differences in prevalence of prescription opiate misuse among rural and urban probationers. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(2):309–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wunsch MJ, Nakamoto K, Behonick G, Massello W. Opioid deaths in rural Virginia: a description of the high prevalence of accidental fatalities involving prescribed medications. Am J Addict. 2009;18(1):5–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Drug overdose mortality by state: 2016. 2016.

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Drug Overdose Death Data. 2017; https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/statedeaths.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2018.

  11. Tilley JC, Ingram V. 2017 Overdose fatality report. 2017. Available at: https://odcp.ky.gov/Documents/2017%20Kentucky%20Overdose%20Fatality%20Report%20%28final1%29.pdf. 19 Oct 2018.

  12. Keyes KM, Cerda M, Brady JE, Havens JR, Galea S. Understanding the rural-urban differences in nonmedical prescription opioid use and abuse in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):e52–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wininger PJ. Pharmaceutical overpromotion liability: the legal battle over rural prescription drug abuse. Ky LJ. 2004;93:269.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Havens JR, Talbert JC, Robert W, Cynthia L, Leukefeld CG. Trends in controlled-release oxycodone (OxyContin®) prescribing among Medicaid recipients in Kentucky, 1998-2002. J Rural Health. 2006;22(3):276–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McDonald DC, Carlson K, Izrael D. Geographic variation in opioid prescribing in the US. J Pain. 2012;13(10):988–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang KH, Fiellin DA, Becker WC. Source of prescription drugs used nonmedically in rural and urban populations. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2014;40(4):292–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sporer KA. Acute heroin overdose. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(7):584–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tracy M, Piper TM, Ompad D, Bucciarelli A, Coffin PO, Vlahov D, et al. Circumstances of witnessed drug overdose in New York City: implications for intervention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79(2):181–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dietze P, Cantwell K, Burgess S. Bystander resuscitation attempts at heroin overdose: does it improve outcomes? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002;67(2):213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rowe C, Santos G-M, Vittinghoff E, Wheeler E, Davidson P, Coffin PO. Neighborhood-level and spatial characteristics associated with lay naloxone reversal events and opioid overdose deaths. J Urban Health. 2016;93(1):117–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rossen LM, Khan D, Warner M. Hot spots in mortality from drug poisoning in the United States, 2007–2009. Health Place. 2014;26:14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klimas J, O’reilly M, Egan M, Tobin H, Bury G. Urban overdose hotspots: a 12-month prospective study in Dublin ambulance services. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(10):1168–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Latkin CA, Hua W, Tobin K. Social network correlates of self-reported non-fatal overdose. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;73(1):61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Young AM, Jonas AB, Mullins UL, Halgin DS, Havens JR. Network structure and the risk for HIV transmission among rural drug users. AIDS Behav. 2012;17(7):2341–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Young AM, Rudolph AE, Quillen D, Havens JR. Spatial, temporal and relational patterns in respondent-driven sampling: evidence from a social network study of rural drug users. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(8):792–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rudolph AE, Young AM, Havens JR. Examining the social context of injection drug use: social proximity to persons who inject drugs versus geographic proximity to persons who inject drugs. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(8):970–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Young AM, Rudolph AE, Havens JR. Network-based research on rural opioid use: an overview of methods and lessons learned. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018:1–7.

  28. Young AM, Rudolph AE, Su AE, King L, Jent S, Havens JR. Accuracy of name and age data provided about network members in a social network study of people who use drugs: implications for constructing sociometric networks. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26(11):802–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). North America detailed streets. 2007; http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f38b87cc295541fb88513d1ed7cec9fd. Accessed September 1, 2013.

  30. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. Ucinet for Windows: software for social network analysis. 2002.

  31. Keeling MJ, Eames KT. Networks and epidemic models. J R Soc Interface. 2005;2(4):295–307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14 [computer program]. College Station, TX StataCorp LP.; 2015.

  33. Stephens DB, Havens JR. Predictors of alcohol use among rural drug users after disclosure of hepatitis C virus status. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013;74(3):386–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Jonas AB, Young AM, Oser CB, Leukefeld CG, Havens JR. OxyContin® as currency: OxyContin® use and increased social capital among rural Appalachian drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(10):1602–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Havens JR, Oser CB, Knudsen HK, Lofwall M, Stoops WW, Walsh SL, et al. Individual and network factors associated with non-fatal overdose among rural Appalachian drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;115(1):107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brewer DD. Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks. Soc Networks. 2000;22(1):29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Brewer DD, Webster CM. Forgetting of friends and its effects on measuring friendship networks. Soc Networks. 2000;21(4):361–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marin A. Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics?: implications for name generator data. Soc Networks. 2004;26(4):289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the National Institute of Health grant numbers R01 DA024598 & R01 DA033862 (PI: Havens, JR), K01 DA033879 (PI: Rudolph, AE), and R21 AI131979 (PI: Rudolph, AE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abby E. Rudolph.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rudolph, A.E., Young, A.M. & Havens, J.R. Using Network and Spatial Data to Better Target Overdose Prevention Strategies in Rural Appalachia. J Urban Health 96, 27–37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-00328-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-00328-y

Keywords

Navigation